148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37023635)
1. Computation of group-level electric field in lower limb motor area for different tDCS montages.
Hamajima H; Gomez-Tames J; Uehara S; Otaka Y; Tanaka S; Hirata A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2023 Jun; 150():69-78. PubMed ID: 37023635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Significant group-level hotspots found in deep brain regions during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A computational analysis of electric fields.
Gomez-Tames J; Asai A; Hirata A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2020 Mar; 131(3):755-765. PubMed ID: 31839398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost of focality in TDCS: Interindividual variability in electric fields.
Mikkonen M; Laakso I; Tanaka S; Hirata A
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31606449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: a basis for high-definition tDCS.
Edwards D; Cortes M; Datta A; Minhas P; Wassermann EM; Bikson M
Neuroimage; 2013 Jul; 74():266-75. PubMed ID: 23370061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electric fields of motor and frontal tDCS in a standard brain space: A computer simulation study.
Laakso I; Tanaka S; Mikkonen M; Koyama S; Sadato N; Hirata A
Neuroimage; 2016 Aug; 137():140-151. PubMed ID: 27188218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-resolution head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: A labeling analysis.
Thomas C; Huang Y; Faria PC; Datta A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():6442-6445. PubMed ID: 31947317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The electric field distributions in anatomical head models during transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke rehabilitation.
Manoli Z; Parazzini M; Ravazzani P; Samaras T
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):262-271. PubMed ID: 28044315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial and polarity precision of concentric high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS).
Alam M; Truong DQ; Khadka N; Bikson M
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jun; 61(12):4506-21. PubMed ID: 27223853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Leg Motor Area - is it partly somatosensory?
Rezaee Z; Dutta A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():4764-4767. PubMed ID: 30441414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of Computational Modeling to Inform tDCS Electrode Montages for the Promotion of Language Recovery in Post-stroke Aphasia.
Galletta EE; Cancelli A; Cottone C; Simonelli I; Tecchio F; Bikson M; Marangolo P
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(6):1108-15. PubMed ID: 26198364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence of transcranial direct current stimulation-generated electric fields at subthalamic level in human brain in vivo.
Chhatbar PY; Kautz SA; Takacs I; Rowland NC; Revuelta GJ; George MS; Bikson M; Feng W
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(4):727-733. PubMed ID: 29576498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inter-individual variability in current direction for common tDCS montages.
Evans C; Zich C; Lee JSA; Ward N; Bestmann S
Neuroimage; 2022 Oct; 260():119501. PubMed ID: 35878726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interindividual differences in posterior fossa morphometry affect cerebellar tDCS-induced electric field strength.
Maas RPPWM; Faber J; ; van de Warrenburg BPC; Schutter DJLG
Clin Neurophysiol; 2023 Sep; 153():152-165. PubMed ID: 37499446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transcranial direct current stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder: an update in electric field modeling and investigations for optimal electrode montage.
da Silva RMF; Batistuzzo MC; Shavitt RG; Miguel EC; Stern E; Mezger E; Padberg F; D'Urso G; Brunoni AR
Expert Rev Neurother; 2019 Oct; 19(10):1025-1035. PubMed ID: 31244347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Electrode Size and Current Intensity on Motor Cortical Excitability: Evidence From Single and Repeated Sessions.
Ho KA; Taylor JL; Chew T; Gálvez V; Alonzo A; Bai S; Dokos S; Loo CK
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26350410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimized APPS-tDCS electrode position, size, and distance doubles the on-target stimulation magnitude in 3000 electric field models.
Caulfield KA; George MS
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):20116. PubMed ID: 36418438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose-controlled tDCS reduces electric field intensity variability at a cortical target site.
Evans C; Bachmann C; Lee JSA; Gregoriou E; Ward N; Bestmann S
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(1):125-136. PubMed ID: 31653475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhanced motor learning with bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation: Impact of polarity or current flow direction?
Naros G; Geyer M; Koch S; Mayr L; Ellinger T; Grimm F; Gharabaghi A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Apr; 127(4):2119-26. PubMed ID: 26818881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneous stimulation using rTMS and tDCS produces the most effective modulation of motor cortical excitability in healthy subjects: A pilot study.
Wang H; Wang X; Jin J; Zhang W; Li Y; Liu Z; Yin T
Neurosci Lett; 2019 Feb; 694():46-50. PubMed ID: 30342993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How does the electric field induced by tDCS influence motor-related connectivity? Model-guided perspectives.
Fernandes SR; Callejón-Leblic MA; Ferreira HA
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(5):. PubMed ID: 38266295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
