42 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37023694)
1.
Hadadi A; Ghanavati S
Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Jul; 197():110786. PubMed ID: 37023694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of vaginal cylinder inhomogeneity on the HDR brachytherapy dose calculations using Monte Carlo simulations.
Meftahi M; Song WY
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 25(1):e14228. PubMed ID: 38043126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of source position on high-dose-rate skin surface applicator dosimetry.
Jeong J; Barker CA; Zaider M; Cohen GN
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(5):650-60. PubMed ID: 27263059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric characterization and output verification for conical brachytherapy surface applicators. Part II. High dose rate 192Ir sources.
Fulkerson RK; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):022104. PubMed ID: 24506636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of HDR brachytherapy doses in the treatment of keloid scars using the egs_brachy Monte Carlo application.
Saikkonen A; Ojala J; Sipilä P; Boman E; Keyriläinen J
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Apr; 68(8):. PubMed ID: 36893475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A Monte Carlo study of the relative biological effectiveness in surface brachytherapy.
Valdes-Cortez C; Niatsetski Y; Perez-Calatayud J; Ballester F; Vijande J
Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 49(8):5576-5588. PubMed ID: 35644023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment planning of a skin-sparing conical breast brachytherapy applicator using conventional brachytherapy software.
Yang Y; Melhus CS; Sioshansi S; Rivard MJ
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1519-25. PubMed ID: 21520863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Verification of Dose Distribution in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy Using Metal and Plastic Applicators].
Tomita F; Fuse H; Fujisaki T; Yasue K; Miyakawa S; Ikoma H; Yoshizawa T; Oyama K; Oyama S; Okumura T; Tamaki Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2023 Jul; 79(7):682-692. PubMed ID: 37316259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The design of a novel direction modulated brachytherapy vaginal cylinder applicator for optimizing coverage of the apex.
Meftahi M; Fields E; Guy C; Song WY
Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):3926-3935. PubMed ID: 35403255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetry of Large Field Valencia applicators for Cobalt-60-based brachytherapy.
Píriz GH; Gonzalez-Sprinberg GA; Ballester F; Vijande J
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38507246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of dosimetric effects of metallic artifact reduction and tissue assignment on Monte Carlo dose calculations for
Assam I; Vijande J; Ballester F; Pérez-Calatayud J; Poppe B; Siebert FA
Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 49(9):6195-6208. PubMed ID: 35925023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of novel shielded nasopharynx applicator designs for intracavitary brachytherapy.
Insley B; Goldberg K; Beaulieu L; Ma Y; McKinley S; Hsu IC; Cunha JA
Brachytherapy; 2022; 21(2):229-237. PubMed ID: 35067466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric Study to Estimate Deviations in Delivered Radiation Dose due to Occluded Air Spaces in Vaginal Vault Brachytherapy Applications.
Srinivas C; Banerjee S; Lobo D; Athiyamaan MS; Ramamoorthy R; Johan S; Abhishek K; Ajaykumar S; Kumar E S A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2023 May; 24(5):1659-1666. PubMed ID: 37247286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of 4D HDR brachytherapy source tracking using x-ray tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo investigation.
Vasyltsiv R; Qian X; Xu Z; Ryu S; Zhao W; Howansky A
Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 50(8):4695-4709. PubMed ID: 37402139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating dose distributions of high dose rate
Aloraibi HA; Siavashpour Z; Ghorbani M; Abtahi M; Jassim H; Gholami S
Appl Radiat Isot; 2024 Feb; 204():111124. PubMed ID: 38029638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of tandem-ovoid titanium applicator on points A, B, bladder, and rectum doses in gynecological brachytherapy using
Sadeghi MH; Sina S; Mehdizadeh A; Faghihi R; Moharramzadeh V; Meigooni AS
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2018 Feb; 10(1):91-95. PubMed ID: 29619061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Organ sparing treatment for penile cancer using a 3D-printed high-dose-rate brachytherapy applicator.
Lee HHC; Chiu TD; Hrycushko B; Xiong Z; Hudak S; Woldu S; Mauck R; Corwin T; Meng X; Margulis V; Desai N; Folkert MR; Garant A
Brachytherapy; 2023; 22(5):580-585. PubMed ID: 37474438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of geometrical parameters of skin brachytherapy patch source on depth dose distribution using Monte Carlo simulation.
Pashazadeh A; Baghani HR; Robatjazi M; Kadavil P
Appl Radiat Isot; 2024 Feb; 204():111117. PubMed ID: 38007882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of failure modes and effects analyses and time for brachytherapy ring and tandem applicator digitization between manual and solid applicator source placement methods.
Holtman AL; DiCostanzo DJ; Zimmerman CA; Graeper G; Woollard J; Christ DF; Cetnar AJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 May; 25(5):e14336. PubMed ID: 38664983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility and air gap pockets of 3D-printed brachytherapy applicator placement in high-dose-rate skin cancer.
Poltorak M; Banatkiewicz P; Poltorak L; Sobolewski P; Zimon D; Szwast M; Walecka I
Phys Med; 2024 Jun; 123():103401. PubMed ID: 38852367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
