These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37026757)

  • 1. 10-year Longitudinal MRI Study of Intervertebral Disk Degeneration in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis After Posterior Lumbar Decompression Surgery.
    Fujii T; Daimon K; Ozaki M; Suzuki S; Takahashi Y; Tsuji O; Nagoshi N; Yagi M; Michikawa T; Matsumoto M; Nakamura M; Watanabe K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Jun; 48(12):815-824. PubMed ID: 37026757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can decompression surgery relieve low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with degenerative lumbar scoliosis?
    Tsutsui S; Kagotani R; Yamada H; Hashizume H; Minamide A; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Yoshida M
    Eur Spine J; 2013 Sep; 22(9):2010-4. PubMed ID: 23612901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between lumbar spinal stenosis and axial muscle wasting.
    Schönnagel L; Zhu J; Camino-Willhuber G; Guven AE; Tani S; Caffard T; Haffer H; Muellner M; Chiapparelli E; Arzani A; Amoroso K; Moser M; Shue J; Tan ET; Carrino JA; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    Spine J; 2024 Feb; 24(2):231-238. PubMed ID: 37788745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and Radiological Study Focused on Relief of Low Back Pain After Decompression Surgery in Selected Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Ikuta K; Masuda K; Tominaga F; Sakuragi T; Kai K; Kitamura T; Senba H; Shidahara S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Dec; 41(24):E1434-E1443. PubMed ID: 27488289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical Outcomes of Posterolateral Fusion vs. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Instability.
    Farrokhi MR; Yadollahikhales G; Gholami M; Mousavi SR; Mesbahi AR; Asadi-Pooya AA
    Pain Physician; 2018 Jul; 21(4):383-406. PubMed ID: 30045595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endplate defects, not the severity of spinal stenosis, contribute to low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Minetama M; Kawakami M; Teraguchi M; Matsuo S; Sumiya T; Nakagawa M; Yamamoto Y; Nakatani T; Nagata W; Nakagawa Y
    Spine J; 2022 Mar; 22(3):370-378. PubMed ID: 34600109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Redefining lumbar spinal stenosis as a developmental syndrome: does age matter?
    Kitab S; Habboub G; Abdulkareem SB; Alimidhatti MB; Benzel E
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Sep; 31(3):357-365. PubMed ID: 31100722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship Between Vertebral Bone Marrow Edema and Early Progression of Intervertebral Disc Wedge or Narrowing After Lumbar Decompression Surgery.
    Nakajima H; Honjoh K; Watanabe S; Kubota A; Matsumine A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Jan; 47(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 34474445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pathomechanism and prevention of further surgery after posterior decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis.
    Nakajima H; Watanabe S; Honjoh K; Kubota A; Matsumine A
    Spine J; 2021 Jun; 21(6):955-962. PubMed ID: 33453385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MRI grading of spinal stenosis is not associated with the severity of low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Minetama M; Kawakami M; Teraguchi M; Matsuo S; Enyo Y; Nakagawa M; Yamamoto Y; Nakatani T; Sakon N; Nagata W; Nakagawa Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Sep; 23(1):857. PubMed ID: 36096768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of sagittal spinal balance, levels of posterior instrumentation, and length of follow-up on low back pain in patients undergoing posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease: a multifactorial analysis.
    Korovessis P; Repantis T; Papazisis Z; Iliopoulos P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):898-905. PubMed ID: 20354466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mid-term changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal stenosis with coexisting degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery: minimum five-year follow-up.
    Salimi H; Toyoda H; Terai H; Yamada K; Hoshino M; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Tamai K; Hori Y; Yabu A; Nakamura H
    Spine J; 2022 May; 22(5):819-826. PubMed ID: 34813957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Provides Comparable Clinical Outcomes in Patients with and without Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Yoshikane K; Kikuchi K; Okazaki K
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Jun; 150():e361-e371. PubMed ID: 33722714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extent of Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Canal after Endoscopic Surgery.
    Dewanngan NK; Yadav YR; Parihar VS; Ratre S; Kher Y; Bhatele P
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2017 Nov; 78(6):541-547. PubMed ID: 28320028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Severe low back pain with mild leg symptoms due to lumbar spine stenosis.
    Kanematsu R; Hanakita J; Takahashi T; Minami M; Miyasaka K; Shimauchi-Ohtaki H; Tomita Y
    Br J Neurosurg; 2024 Feb; 38(1):35-38. PubMed ID: 33463390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative scoliosis: Predictive factors of radiographic and clinical outcomes.
    Minamide A; Yoshida M; Iwahashi H; Simpson AK; Yamada H; Hashizume H; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S; Kagotani R; Sonekatsu M; Sasaki T; Shinto K; Deguchi T
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 May; 22(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28161236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Posterolateral fusion combined with posterior decompression shows superiority in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis without lumbar disc protrusion or prolapse: a retrospective cohort study.
    Wang C; Yin X; Zhang L; Xue X; Xiang Y; Jin H; Liu M; Zhao J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 15(1):26. PubMed ID: 31969171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes in cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis more than 5 years after treatment with minimally invasive decompression: examination of pre- and postoperative slippage, intervertebral disc changes, and clinical results.
    Mori G; Mikami Y; Arai Y; Ikeda T; Nagae M; Tonomura H; Takatori R; Sawada K; Fujiwara H; Kubo T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 26613282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Indirect Decompression on MRI Chronologically Progresses After Immediate Postlateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Results From a Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up.
    Nakashima H; Kanemura T; Satake K; Ishikawa Y; Ouchida J; Segi N; Yamaguchi H; Imagama S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Dec; 44(24):E1411-E1418. PubMed ID: 31365515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the presence of foraminal stenosis associated with outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis patients treated with posterior microsurgical decompression.
    Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Anvar M; Weber C; Solberg T; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Aug; 165(8):2121-2129. PubMed ID: 37407851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.