These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37027039)

  • 21. Emergence and transmission of misinformation in the context of social interactions.
    Saraiva M; Garrido MV; Albuquerque PB
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jan; 49(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 32789597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Benefits and Detriments of Social Collaborative Memory in Turn-Taking and Directed Forgetting.
    Nie A; Guo B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2023 Jun; 130(3):1040-1076. PubMed ID: 36988341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.
    Meade ML; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):962-75. PubMed ID: 19744936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Collaborative remembering reduces suggestibility: A study with the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale.
    Rossi-Arnaud C; Spataro P; Bhatia D; Cestari V
    Memory; 2019 May; 27(5):603-611. PubMed ID: 30384799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of multiple trials and computer-mediated communication on collaborative and individual semantic recall.
    Hinds JM; Payne SJ
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):415-423. PubMed ID: 28750599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Features of Successful and Unsuccessful Collaborative Memory Conversations in Long-Married Couples.
    Harris CB; Barnier AJ; Sutton J; Savage G
    Top Cogn Sci; 2019 Oct; 11(4):668-686. PubMed ID: 29851268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Inhibitory Process of Collaborative Inhibition: Assessment Using an Emotional Stroop Task.
    Zhang H; Zhang X; Liu X; Yang H; Shi J
    Psychol Rep; 2020 Apr; 123(2):300-324. PubMed ID: 30428267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differentiating the DF effect in episodic memory: evaluating the contribution of the procedures of collaborative memory.
    Nie A; Guo B
    J Gen Psychol; 2024; 151(3):223-270. PubMed ID: 37671532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Remembering with a friend or a stranger: comparing acquainted and unacquainted pairs in collaborative eyewitness interviews.
    Vredeveldt A; van Deuren S; van Koppen PJ
    Memory; 2019 Nov; 27(10):1390-1403. PubMed ID: 31500512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patterns of interaction-dominant dynamics in individual versus collaborative memory foraging.
    Szary J; Dale R; Kello CT; Rhodes T
    Cogn Process; 2015 Nov; 16(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 26314586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: evidence for a retrieval-based account.
    Finlay F; Hitch GJ; Meudell PR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1556-67. PubMed ID: 11185782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Collaborative recall of details of an emotional film.
    Wessel I; Zandstra AR; Hengeveld HM; Moulds ML
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):437-44. PubMed ID: 24628679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does retrieval strategy disruption cause general and specific collaborative inhibition?
    Dahlström Ö; Danielsson H; Emilsson M; Andersson J
    Memory; 2011 Feb; 19(2):140-54. PubMed ID: 21331969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Collective memory: collaborative and individual processes in remembering.
    Weldon MS; Bellinger KD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Sep; 23(5):1160-1175. PubMed ID: 9293627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Shared encoding and the costs and benefits of collaborative recall.
    Harris CB; Barnier AJ; Sutton J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):183-95. PubMed ID: 22686851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Collaborative memory and part-set cueing impairments: the role of executive depletion in modulating retrieval disruption.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2011 May; 19(4):378-97. PubMed ID: 21678155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Younger and older adults' collaborative recall of shared and unshared emotional pictures.
    Barber SJ; Castrellon JJ; Opitz P; Mather M
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):716-730. PubMed ID: 28224452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Consensus collaboration enhances group and individual recall accuracy.
    Harris CB; Barnier AJ; Sutton J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):179-94. PubMed ID: 21939368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Control processes in short-term storage: Retrieval strategies in immediate recall depend upon the number of words to be recalled.
    Ward G; Tan L
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):658-682. PubMed ID: 30617748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Correction of false memory for associated word lists by collaborating groups.
    Weigold A; Russell EJ; Natera SN
    Am J Psychol; 2014; 127(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 24934009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.