These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37027040)

  • 1. Beauty and the sharp fangs of the beast: degree of angularity predicts perceived preference and threat.
    Friedenberg J; Lauria G; Hennig K; Gardner I
    Psychol Res; 2023 Nov; 87(8):2594-2602. PubMed ID: 37027040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do observers like curvature or do they dislike angularity?
    Bertamini M; Palumbo L; Gheorghes TN; Galatsidas M
    Br J Psychol; 2016 Feb; 107(1):154-78. PubMed ID: 25871463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Saliency of Angular Shapes in Threatening and Nonthreatening Faces.
    Watier N
    Perception; 2018 Mar; 47(3):306-329. PubMed ID: 29310526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beauty in the Eye of the Beholder.
    Friedenberg J
    Exp Psychol; 2019 Mar; 66(2):112-125. PubMed ID: 30895912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceived beauty of random texture patterns: A preference for complexity.
    Friedenberg J; Liby B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jul; 168():41-9. PubMed ID: 27155800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shape familiarity modulates preference for curvature in drawings of common-use objects.
    Chuquichambi EG; Palumbo L; Rey C; Munar E
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11772. PubMed ID: 34268016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prior Experience Alters the Appearance of Blurry Object Borders.
    Perez DC; Cook SM; Peterson MA
    Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):5821. PubMed ID: 32242057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in first- and second-order temporal judgment.
    Corcoran AW; Groot C; Bruno A; Johnston A; Cropper SJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0191422. PubMed ID: 29401520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Representation of angles embedded within contour stimuli in area V2 of macaque monkeys.
    Ito M; Komatsu H
    J Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 24(13):3313-24. PubMed ID: 15056711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Angle discrimination in raised-line drawings.
    Wijntjes MW; Kappers AM
    Perception; 2007; 36(6):865-79. PubMed ID: 17718365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The contour effect: Differences in the aesthetic preference and stress response to photo-realistic living environments.
    Tawil N; Ascone L; Kühn S
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():933344. PubMed ID: 36532994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can Hospital Form Trigger Fear Response?
    Pati D; O'Boyle M; Hou J; Nanda U; Ghamari H
    HERD; 2016 Apr; 9(3):162-75. PubMed ID: 26747839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of everyday objects on the basis of fragmented outline versions.
    Panis S; De Winter J; Vandekerckhove J; Wagemans J
    Perception; 2008; 37(2):271-89. PubMed ID: 18456927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Curve Appeal: Exploring Individual Differences in Preference for Curved Versus Angular Objects.
    Cotter KN; Silvia PJ; Bertamini M; Palumbo L; Vartanian O
    Iperception; 2017; 8(2):2041669517693023. PubMed ID: 28491269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Visual Aesthetics of Snowflakes.
    Adkins OC; Norman JF
    Perception; 2016 Nov; 45(11):1304-1319. PubMed ID: 27457713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of presentation time on preference for curvature of real objects and meaningless novel patterns.
    Corradi G; Rosselló-Mir J; Vañó J; Chuquichambi E; Bertamini M; Munar E
    Br J Psychol; 2019 Nov; 110(4):670-685. PubMed ID: 30536967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Angular subtense effects on perception of polar and parallel projections of cubes.
    Nicholls AL; Kennedy JM
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Dec; 54(6):763-72. PubMed ID: 8134246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Global shape versus local feature: an angle illusion.
    Kennedy GJ; Orbach HS; Loffler G
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1281-9. PubMed ID: 18430451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. More Than Meets the Eye: The Effect of Intercanthal Distance on Perception of Beauty and Personality.
    Naran S; Wes AM; Mazzaferro DM; Bartlett SP; Taylor JA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 29(1):40-44. PubMed ID: 29068970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.