193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37027122)
1. Positive surgical margins after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in-situ: does histologic grade or estrogen receptor status matter?
Fauveau LR; Dao TN; Wallace LB; Mamawala MK; Obaid A; Waddimba AC; Grant MD
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Jun; 199(2):215-220. PubMed ID: 37027122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
van Deurzen CH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Langhans L; Jensen MB; Talman MM; Vejborg I; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 28002557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of consensus guidelines for breast-conserving surgery in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Tremelling A; Aft RL; Cyr AE; Gillanders WE; Glover-Collins K; Herrmann V; Margenthaler JA
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 May; 5(5):e1502. PubMed ID: 34245135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope for intraoperative margin assessment - POLARHIS study.
Sandor MF; Schwalbach B; Hofmann V; Istrate SE; Schuller Z; Ionescu E; Heimann S; Ragazzi M; Lux MP
Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():118-125. PubMed ID: 36240525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors influencing suboptimal pathologic margins and re-excision following breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in-situ.
Dhak S; Baliski C; Bakos B
Am J Surg; 2023 May; 225(5):866-870. PubMed ID: 36894415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinicopathological Predictors of Positive Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Chauhan H; Jiwa N; Nagarajan VR; Thiruchelvam P; Hogben K; Al-Mufti R; Hadjiminas D; Shousha S; Cutress R; Ashrafian H; Takats Z; Leff DR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):3939-3947. PubMed ID: 38520579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tumor margins that lead to reoperation in breast cancer: A retrospective register study of 4,489 patients.
Lepomäki M; Karhunen-Enckell U; Tuominen J; Kronqvist P; Oksala N; Murtola T; Roine A
J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 125(4):577-588. PubMed ID: 34779520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors Associated With Positive Margins in Women Undergoing Breast Conservation Surgery.
Murphy BL; Boughey JC; Keeney MG; Glasgow AE; Racz JM; Keeney GL; Habermann EB
Mayo Clin Proc; 2018 Apr; 93(4):429-435. PubMed ID: 29439832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effect of Lumpectomy and Cavity Shave Margin Status on Recurrence and Survival in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Abdelsattar JM; Afridi FG; Dai Z; Yousaf N; Seldomridge A; Battin AO; Wen S; Gray D; Marsh JW; Cowher MS; Partin JF; Hazard-Jenkins H; Lupinacci K
Am Surg; 2023 Mar; 89(3):424-433. PubMed ID: 34196595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extent of ductal carcinoma in situ according to breast cancer subtypes: a population-based cohort study.
Doebar SC; van den Broek EC; Koppert LB; Jager A; Baaijens MHA; Obdeijn IAM; van Deurzen CHM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jul; 158(1):179-187. PubMed ID: 27318854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. External validation and modification of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins before breast conserving surgery.
Jung JJ; Kang E; Kim EK; Kim SM; Jang M; La Yun B; Park SY; Shin HC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Sep; 183(2):373-380. PubMed ID: 32647937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved outcomes of breast-conserving therapy for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Halasz LM; Sreedhara M; Chen YH; Bellon JR; Punglia RS; Wong JS; Harris JR; Brock JE
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(4):e581-6. PubMed ID: 22208975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does Mammographic Density have an Impact on the Margin Re-excision Rate After Breast-Conserving Surgery?
Edwards BL; Guidry CA; Larson KN; Novicoff WM; Harvey JA; Schroen AT
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):782-8. PubMed ID: 26471488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery between ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
Choi YJ; Shin YD; Song YJ
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 14():126. PubMed ID: 27122132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lack of definitive presurgical pathological diagnosis is associated with inadequate surgical margins in breast-conserving surgery.
Nasute Fauerbach PV; Tyryshkin K; Rodrigo SP; Rudan J; Fichtinger G; Reedijk M; Varma S; Berman DM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Oct; 47(10):2483-2491. PubMed ID: 34120811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoperative Pathologic Margin Analysis and Re-Excision to Minimize Reoperation for Patients Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Racz JM; Glasgow AE; Keeney GL; Degnim AC; Hieken TJ; Jakub JW; Cheville JC; Habermann EB; Boughey JC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 27(13):5303-5311. PubMed ID: 32623609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the relationship between ductal carcinoma in situ, calcifications, and margin status in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery.
Bruenderman EH; Bhutiani N; Mercer MK; McMasters KM; Sanders MAG; Ajkay NL
J Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 119(6):694-699. PubMed ID: 30742316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rate of re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma.
Wanis ML; Wong JA; Rodriguez S; Wong JM; Jabo B; Ashok A; Lum SS; Solomon NL; Reeves ME; Garberoglio CA; Senthil M
Am Surg; 2013 Oct; 79(10):1119-22. PubMed ID: 24160812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adoption of SSO-ASTRO Margin Guidelines for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: What Is the Impact on Use of Additional Surgery?
Mamtani A; Romanoff A; Baser R; Vincent A; Morrow M; Gemignani ML
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):295-302. PubMed ID: 32500343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
