These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37027757)

  • 41. Using HVS Dual-Pathway and Contrast Sensitivity to Blindly Assess Image Quality.
    Chen F; Fu H; Yu H; Chu Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 May; 23(10):. PubMed ID: 37430884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [CT image quality assessment based on prior information of pre-restored images].
    Gao Q; Zhu M; Li D; Bian Z; Ma J
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2021 Feb; 41(2):230-237. PubMed ID: 33624596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cubemap-Based Perception-Driven Blind Quality Assessment for 360-degree Images.
    Jiang H; Jiang G; Yu M; Zhang Y; Yang Y; Peng Z; Chen F; Zhang Q
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():2364-2377. PubMed ID: 33481711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. VSI: a visual saliency-induced index for perceptual image quality assessment.
    Zhang L; Shen Y; Li H
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Oct; 23(10):4270-81. PubMed ID: 25122572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A Soft-Reference Breast Ultrasound Image Quality Assessment Method That Considers the Local Lesion Area.
    Wang Z; Song Y; Zhao B; Zhong Z; Yao L; Lv F; Li B; Hu Y
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2023 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 37627825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Blind Image Quality Assessment.
    Yan Q; Gong D; Zhang Y
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 May; 28(5):2200-2211. PubMed ID: 30507506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Swimming Pool Images.
    Lei F; Li S; Xie S; Liu J
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():766762. PubMed ID: 35087371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Fine-Grained Quality Assessment for Compressed Images.
    Zhang X; Lin W; Wang S; Liu J; Ma S; Gao W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Mar; 28(3):1163-1175. PubMed ID: 30296227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of Full-Reference Image Quality Models for Optimization of Image Processing Systems.
    Ding K; Ma K; Wang S; Simoncelli EP
    Int J Comput Vis; 2021; 129(4):1258-1281. PubMed ID: 33495671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A Spatial and Geometry Feature-Based Quality Assessment Model for the Light Field Images.
    Huang H; Zeng H; Hou J; Chen J; Zhu J; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():3765-3779. PubMed ID: 35604974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Learning a No-Reference Quality Assessment Model of Enhanced Images With Big Data.
    Gu K; Tao D; Qiao JF; Lin W
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2018 Apr; 29(4):1301-1313. PubMed ID: 28287984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Correlation between subjective and objective assessment of magnetic resonance (MR) images.
    Chow LS; Rajagopal H; Paramesran R;
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 34(6):820-831. PubMed ID: 26969762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Image quality assessment based on the perceived structural similarity index of an image.
    Yao J; Shen J; Yao C
    Math Biosci Eng; 2023 Mar; 20(5):9385-9409. PubMed ID: 37161248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Modified-BRISQUE as no reference image quality assessment for structural MR images.
    Chow LS; Rajagopal H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Nov; 43():74-87. PubMed ID: 28716679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Unsupervised blind image quality assessment via joint spatial and transform features.
    Yang C; He Q; An P
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):10865. PubMed ID: 37407688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Rectangular-Normalized Superpixel Entropy Index for Image Quality Assessment.
    Lu T; Wang J; Zhou H; Jiang J; Ma J; Wang Z
    Entropy (Basel); 2018 Dec; 20(12):. PubMed ID: 33266671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Super Resolution Image Visual Quality Assessment Based on Feature Optimization.
    Lei S; Zijian H; Jiebin Y; Fengchang F
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():1263348. PubMed ID: 35769272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Confusing Image Quality Assessment: Toward Better Augmented Reality Experience.
    Duan H; Min X; Zhu Y; Zhai G; Yang X; Le Callet P
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():7206-7221. PubMed ID: 36367913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Conv-Former: A Novel Network Combining Convolution and Self-Attention for Image Quality Assessment.
    Han L; Lv H; Zhao Y; Liu H; Bi G; Yin Z; Fang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 36617024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on the Fusion of Statistical and Perceptual Features.
    Varga D
    J Imaging; 2020 Jul; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 34460690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.