233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37028245)
1. ADMs and synthetic meshes improve implant-based breast reconstruction aesthetics, but at what cost?
Samaha Y; Chen J; Ray EC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 May; 80():178-181. PubMed ID: 37028245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Human, Porcine, and Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.
Pires GR; Moss WD; Hosein RC; Overschmidt BT; Magno-Padron DA; Agarwal JP; McFarland MM; Casucci T; Kwok AC
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Dec; 89(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 36416706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Zhu L; Liu C
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Aug; 47(4):1260-1273. PubMed ID: 36947180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes after tissue expander exchange to implant in two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix: A retrospective cohort study.
Marquez JL; French M; Ormiston L; Pires G; Martheswaran T; Eddington D; Tuncer F; Agarwal JP; Kwok AC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Feb; 89():97-104. PubMed ID: 38160591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety Profile and Predictors of Aesthetic Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Belmonte BM; Campbell CA
Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 86(6S Suppl 5):S585-S592. PubMed ID: 34100818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aesthetic Limitations in Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Safran T; Al-Badarin F; Al-Halabi B; Viezel-Mathieu A; Dionisopoulos T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul; 150(1):22e-31e. PubMed ID: 35499675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acellular dermal matrices as an adjunct to implant breast reconstruction: Analysis of outcomes and complications.
Tasoulis MK; Teoh V; Khan A; Montgomery C; Mohammed K; Gui G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Apr; 46(4 Pt A):511-515. PubMed ID: 31706716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do we need acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral breast reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nolan IT; Farajzadeh MM; Boyd CJ; Bekisz JM; Gibson EG; Salibian AA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Nov; 86():251-260. PubMed ID: 37793198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix Type in Treatment of Capsular Contracture in Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Samuels K; Millet E; Wong L
Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Dec; 44(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 37595294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic review of complications in prepectoral breast reconstruction.
Wagner RD; Braun TL; Zhu H; Winocour S
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Jul; 72(7):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 31076195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Sinnott CJ; Persing SM; Pronovost M; Hodyl C; McConnell D; Ott Young A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 25(10):2899-2908. PubMed ID: 29978367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 3-Year Review.
Poveromo LP; Franck P; Ellison A; Janhofer DE; Asadourian PA; Otterburn DM
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 May; 88(3 Suppl 3):S205-S208. PubMed ID: 35513321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Considerations for patient selection: Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
Yang JY; Kim CW; Lee JW; Kim SK; Lee SA; Hwang E
Arch Plast Surg; 2019 Nov; 46(6):550-557. PubMed ID: 31775208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Timeline and Incidence of Postoperative Complications in Prepectoral, Dual-Plane, and Total Submuscular Alloplastic Reconstruction With and Without Biosynthetic Scaffold Usage.
Chen Y; Wang ML; Black GG; Bernstein JL; Chinta M; Otterburn DM
Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Jun; 90(6S Suppl 5):S466-S471. PubMed ID: 36880719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. BROWSE: A multicentre comparison of nine year outcomes in acellular dermal matrix based and complete submuscular implant-based immediate breast reconstruction-aesthetics, capsular contracture and patient reported outcomes.
Wilson RL; Kirwan CC; O'Donoghue JM; Linforth RA; Johnson RK; Harvey JR
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 34836730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Karp NS; Salibian AA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When to Consider Prepectoral Implant Conversion After Subpectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction and How to Plan It.
Salgarello M; Barone Adesi L; Macrì G; Visconti G
Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Nov; 43(12):NP1071-NP1077. PubMed ID: 37668406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparison of Dermal Autograft and Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: Long-term Aesthetic Outcomes and Capsular Contracture.
Lynch MP; Chung MT; Rinker BD
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 74 Suppl 4():S214-7. PubMed ID: 25389715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
