These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Temporal-spatial parameters of gait in transfemoral amputees: Comparison of bionic and mechanically passive knee joints. Uchytil J; Jandacka D; Zahradnik D; Farana R; Janura M Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Jun; 38(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 23824546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Highly integrated bionic prostheses resolve the thermal asymmetry between residual amputated and contralateral limbs. Lang VA; Munoz-Novoa M; Ortiz-Catalan M Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6260. PubMed ID: 37069299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A survey on what Australians with upper limb difference want in a prosthesis: justification for using soft robotics and additive manufacturing for customized prosthetic hands. Stephens-Fripp B; Jean Walker M; Goddard E; Alici G Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Apr; 15(3):342-349. PubMed ID: 30856031 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees. Kejlaa GH Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 8134275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cognitive performance and brain dynamics during walking with a novel bionic foot: A pilot study. De Pauw K; Cherelle P; Tassignon B; Van Cutsem J; Roelands B; Marulanda FG; Lefeber D; Vanderborght B; Meeusen R PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214711. PubMed ID: 30943265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of functionality in acquired and congenital upper extremity child amputees. Korkmaz M; Erbahçeci F; Ulger O; Topuz S Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2012; 46(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 22951757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prosthetic use in adult upper limb amputees: a comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses. Millstein SG; Heger H; Hunter GA Prosthet Orthot Int; 1986 Apr; 10(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 3725563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ["Bionic" arm prostheses. State of the art in research and development]. Pylatiuk C; Döderlein L Orthopade; 2006 Nov; 35(11):1169-70, 1172-5. PubMed ID: 16932834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design of lower limb prosthetic sockets: a review. Wang M; Nong Q; Liu Y; Yu H Expert Rev Med Devices; 2022 Jan; 19(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 34932435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prosthetic gait of unilateral lower-limb amputees with current and novel prostheses: A pilot study. De Pauw K; Serrien B; Baeyens JP; Cherelle P; De Bock S; Ghillebert J; Bailey SP; Lefeber D; Roelands B; Vanderborght B; Meeusen R Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Jan; 71():59-67. PubMed ID: 31704536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A UV damage-sensing nociceptive device for bionic applications. Zhou L; Zhang SR; Yang JQ; Mao JY; Ren Y; Shan H; Xu Z; Zhou Y; Han ST Nanoscale; 2020 Jan; 12(3):1484-1494. PubMed ID: 31909402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feminine identity and functional benefits are key factors in women's decision making about upper limb prostheses: a case series. Resnik L; Klinger S; Gill A; Ekerholm Biester S Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Feb; 14(2):194-208. PubMed ID: 29741966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees. Dudkiewicz I; Gabrielov R; Seiv-Ner I; Zelig G; Heim M Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Jan; 26(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 14660200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Case-study of a user-driven prosthetic arm design: bionic hand versus customized body-powered technology in a highly demanding work environment. Schweitzer W; Thali MJ; Egger D J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 15(1):1. PubMed ID: 29298708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensory feedback for limb prostheses in amputees. Raspopovic S; Valle G; Petrini FM Nat Mater; 2021 Jul; 20(7):925-939. PubMed ID: 33859381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]