336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37028551)
41. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Costantine MM; Fox K; Byers BD; Mateus J; Ghulmiyyah LM; Blackwell S; Hankins GDV; Grobman WA; Saade G
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 114(5):1029-1033. PubMed ID: 20168103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Validation of updated antenatal vaginal birth after caesarean section prediction model without race and ethnicity in Australia.
Liu CZ; Mahomed K
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Jun; 63(3):314-320. PubMed ID: 36259468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Does midtrimester cervical length aid in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean?
Miller ES; Sakowicz A; Donelan EA; Grobman WA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):791.e1-4. PubMed ID: 25726519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Is there an Association between Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Prediction and Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury?
Brown O; Luchristt D; Miller ES; Pidaparti M; Geynisman-Tan J; Kenton K; Lewicky-Gaupp C
Am J Perinatol; 2022 May; 39(7):750-758. PubMed ID: 32992349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Vaginal birth after cesarean in women with pre-labor rupture of membranes at term.
Zipori Y; Ben-David C; Lauterbach R; Weissman A; Beloosesky R; Ginsberg Y; Weiner Z; Khatib N
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Nov; 35(21):4065-4070. PubMed ID: 33183111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. VBAC calculator 2.0: Recent evidence.
Thornton PD
Birth; 2023 Mar; 50(1):120-126. PubMed ID: 36639832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Disparities by race/ethnicity in unplanned cesarean birth among healthy nulliparas: a secondary analysis of the nuMoM2b dataset.
Carlson NS; Carlson MS; Erickson EN; Higgins M; Britt AJ; Amore AD
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 May; 23(1):342. PubMed ID: 37173616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A standardized labor induction protocol: impact on racial disparities in obstetrical outcomes.
Hamm RF; Srinivas SK; Levine LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2020 Aug; 2(3):100148. PubMed ID: 33345879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A prediction tool for mode of delivery in twin pregnancies-a secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study.
Aviram A; Barrett J; Mei-Dan E; Yoon EW; Melamed N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jul; 231(1):124.e1-124.e11. PubMed ID: 37979823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The interaction between maternal race/ethnicity and chronic hypertension on preterm birth.
Premkumar A; Henry DE; Moghadassi M; Nakagawa S; Norton ME
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):787.e1-787.e8. PubMed ID: 27555318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Recent trends in term trial of labor after cesarean by number of prior cesarean deliveries.
Pineles BL; Buskmiller CM; Qureshey EJ; Stephens AJ; Sibai BM
AJOG Glob Rep; 2023 Aug; 3(3):100232. PubMed ID: 37342471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Vaginal birth after a cesarean delivery for arrest of descent
Fox NS; Namath AG; Ali M; Naqvi M; Gupta S; Rebarber A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Aug; 32(16):2638-2642. PubMed ID: 29455594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery.
Landon MB; Leindecker S; Spong CY; Hauth JC; Bloom S; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM; Gabbe SG;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1016-23. PubMed ID: 16157104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Trial of labor after cesarean in primiparous women with fetal macrosomia.
Lessans N; Martonovits S; Rottenstreich M; Yagel S; Kleinstern G; Sela HY; Porat S; Levin G; Rosenbloom JI; Ezra Y; Rottenstreich A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Aug; 306(2):389-396. PubMed ID: 34709449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity.
Hibbard JU; Ismail MA; Wang Y; Te C; Karrison T; Ismail MA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1365-71; discussion 1371-3. PubMed ID: 11408854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing >4000 g.
Zelop CM; Shipp TD; Repke JT; Cohen A; Lieberman E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):903-5. PubMed ID: 11641675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Maternal Morbidity and Birth Satisfaction After Implementation of a Validated Calculator to Predict Cesarean Delivery During Labor Induction.
Hamm RF; McCoy J; Oladuja A; Bogner HR; Elovitz MA; Morales KH; Srinivas SK; Levine LD
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2025582. PubMed ID: 33185679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries.
Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Faucett AM; Grobman WA
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 125(4):948-952. PubMed ID: 25751218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Examining the validity of a predictive model for vaginal birth after cesarean.
Wong JWH; Yoshino KDN; Ahn HJ; Choi SY; Chang AL
J Perinat Med; 2019 Dec; 48(1):11-15. PubMed ID: 31730535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Early childhood educational outcomes of children associated with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Gimovsky AC; Schlichting LE; White J; Fisher K; Vivier PM; Werner EF
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Nov; 4(6):100698. PubMed ID: 35908729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
