These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37029006)
1. Evaluation of the virtual cement gap parameter of different CAD software programs in designing a single crown restoration: An in vitro study. Sarhan MM; Khamis MM; Abdelhamid AM; Ezzelarab S J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):777.e1-777.e7. PubMed ID: 37029006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of virtual cement gap settings on the marginal fit of cemented resin-ceramic crowns on implant abutments. Sultan S; Hegazy M; Shakal M; Magdy S J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):804.e1-804.e6. PubMed ID: 33934821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal Adaptation of Provisional CAD/CAM Restorations Fabricated Using Various Simulated Digital Cement Space Settings. Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B; Şeker E; Shah K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1064-1069. PubMed ID: 30231093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns. Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of virtual cement space and restorative materials on the adaptation of CAD-CAM endocrowns. Zheng Z; Wang H; Mo J; Ling Z; Zeng Y; Zhang Y; Wang J; Yan W BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):580. PubMed ID: 36494663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and the heat-press technique. Mously HA; Finkelman M; Zandparsa R; Hirayama H J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 24795263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns with different finish lines by using a micro-CT technique. Rizonaki M; Jacquet W; Bottenberg P; Depla L; Boone M; De Coster PJ J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):890-898. PubMed ID: 33541816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between 2D and 3D measurements of cement space in CAD-CAM crowns. Piras FF; Ferruzzi F; Ferrairo BM; Mosquim V; Ramalho IS; Bonfante EA; Rubo JH J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):688-694. PubMed ID: 33750574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns. Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of cement space on marginal discrepancy and retention of CAD/CAM crown. Hassan LA; Goo CL Dent Mater J; 2021 Sep; 40(5):1189-1195. PubMed ID: 34078778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 3D-Printed Single Crown Outcomes Among Different Computer-Aided Design Software Programs. No-Cortes J; Attard B; Mifsud DP; Lima JF; Markarian RA; Ayres AP; Cassar G; Cortes ARG; Attard NJ Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(7):63-70. PubMed ID: 38489222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach. Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of different cement spaces on the marginal gap of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Zhang Y; Dudley J Aust Dent J; 2019 Jun; 64(2):167-174. PubMed ID: 30883797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns. Tamac E; Toksavul S; Toman M J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 24819532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings. Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns designed using three different dental CAD programs: a 3-dimensional digital analysis study. Farah RI; Alresheedi B Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):263-271. PubMed ID: 36100722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture behavior, marginal gap width, and marginal quality of vented or pre-cemented CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns luted on Y-TZP implants. Zaugg LK; Meyer S; Rohr N; Zehnder I; Zitzmann NU Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Feb; 29(2):175-184. PubMed ID: 29090511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans. Kale E; Cilli M; Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 31653403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]