These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37029908)

  • 1. Evaluating Performance of Circular Staplers Using Comparative Test Methods for Evidence-Based Surgery.
    Strassner H; Caulk A; Reher N; Petrescu S; Vasanji A
    Surg Innov; 2023 Oct; 30(5):576-585. PubMed ID: 37029908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study.
    Wang T; Sadowsky M; Blakney R; Coplan P; Petraiuolo W; Soberman M; Tomaszewski J; Rene L; Wood J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Nov; 38(1):264. PubMed ID: 37932486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidence of anastomotic leakage using powered circular staplers versus manual circular staplers for left colorectal anastomosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Pérez-Santiago L; Barrachina-Martinez I; González-de-Julián S; Vivas-Consuelo D; Espí-Macías A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2024 Jul; 28(1):76. PubMed ID: 38954099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Initial clinical experience with a powered circular stapler for colorectal anastomosis.
    Atallah S; Kural S; Banda N; Banda A; Bawaney F; Cabral F; Neychev V; Patel C; Larach S
    Tech Coloproctol; 2020 May; 24(5):479-486. PubMed ID: 32193667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Nekliudov NA; Tsarkov PV; Tulina IA
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e15978. PubMed ID: 31192938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the side-to-side stapled anastomosis: comparison of staplers for robust crotch formation.
    Kimura M; Kuwabara Y; Taniwaki S; Mitsui A; Shibata Y; Ueno S
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2018 Jan; 14(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 29108894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fact or fiction? Does the position of the end-to-end (EEA) stapler spike matter for colorectal anastomoses using a double-stapled technique?
    Cavallaro P; Lee GC; Kanters A; Valente M; Holubar SD; Champagne B; Rosen D; Gorgun E; Steele S
    Colorectal Dis; 2024 Jan; 26(1):137-144. PubMed ID: 38083875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of a circular powered stapler for creation of anastomosis in left-sided colorectal surgery: A prospective cohort study.
    Herzig DO; Ogilvie JW; Chudzinski A; Ferrara A; Ashraf SQ; Jimenez-Rodriguez RM; Van der Speeten K; Kinross J; Schimmelpenning H; Sagar PM; Cannon JA; Schwiers ML; Singleton DW; Waggoner JR; Fryrear R; Sylla P
    Int J Surg; 2020 Dec; 84():140-146. PubMed ID: 33176211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety of Small Circular Staplers in Double Stapling Technique Anastomosis for Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer.
    Nagaoka T; Yamaguchi T; Nagasaki T; Akiyoshi T; Nagayama S; Fukunaga Y; Chino A; Ishizuka N; Konishi T
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Aug; 64(8):937-945. PubMed ID: 33951685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis.
    Matsuhashi N; Tajima JY; Yokoi R; Kiyama S; Endo M; Sato Y; Kuno M; Hayashi H; Asai R; Fukada M; Yasufuku I; Tanaka Y; Okumura N; Murase K; Ishihara T; Takahashi T
    BMC Surg; 2023 Oct; 23(1):332. PubMed ID: 37898761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of 5-mm Laparoscopic Stapler to Perform Open Small Bowel Anastomosis in a Neonatal Animal Model.
    Glenn IC; Bruns NE; Ponsky TA
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Oct; 26(10):840-844. PubMed ID: 27462959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-row versus two-row circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts.
    Catarci M; Guadagni S; Masedu F; Ruffo G; Viola MG; Borghi F; Baldazzi G; Scatizzi M;
    Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2312-2323. PubMed ID: 37195782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study.
    Vignali A; Gozzini L; Gasparini G; Calef R; Rosati R; Elmore U
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):211. PubMed ID: 37561203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does advancement in stapling technology with triple-row and enhanced staple configurations confer additional safety? A matched comparison of 340 stapled ileocolic anastomoses.
    Foo CC; Chiu AHO; Yip J; Law WL
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jul; 32(7):3122-3130. PubMed ID: 29340808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical characteristics can make the difference in a surgical linear stapler. Or not?
    Giaccaglia V; Antonelli MS; Addario Chieco P; Cocorullo G; Cavallini M; Gulotta G
    J Surg Res; 2015 Jul; 197(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 25918006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Profiling Surgical Staplers: Does Staple Direction Affect the Strength of the Anastomosis.
    Kimura M; Takahashi H; Tanaka T; Sagawa H; Takeyama H
    Dig Surg; 2015; 32(6):454-8. PubMed ID: 26488286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for left-sided colorectal reconstructions: a propensity score matching-adjusted indirect comparison with manual circular staplers.
    Sylla P; Sagar P; Johnston SS; Dwarakanathan HR; Waggoner JR; Schwiers M; Roy S
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Apr; 36(4):2541-2553. PubMed ID: 34031743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of tissue compression on circular stapler line failure.
    Myers SR; Rothermel WS; Shaffer L
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Sep; 25(9):3043-9. PubMed ID: 21487874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of pressure resistance of double-rows and triple-rows circular stapler in rectal double stapling technique: In vitro study.
    Mazaki J; Katsumata K; Udo R; Tago T; Kasahara K; Kuwabara H; Enomoto M; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y; Tsuchida A
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Jul; 101(28):e29600. PubMed ID: 35839009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preventing complications in colorectal anastomosis: results of a randomized controlled trial using bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement for circular stapler.
    Placer C; Enríquez-Navascués JM; Elorza G; Timoteo A; Mugica JA; Borda N; Saralegui Y; Elósegui JL
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Oct; 57(10):1195-201. PubMed ID: 25203376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.