These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37030808)

  • 1. A Deep Denoising Sound Coding Strategy for Cochlear Implants.
    Gajecki T; Zhang Y; Nogueira W
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Sep; 70(9):2700-2709. PubMed ID: 37030808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Fused Deep Denoising Sound Coding Strategy for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Gajecki T; Nogueira W
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2024 Jul; 71(7):2232-2242. PubMed ID: 38376983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Kerber S; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Wilson BS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e138-48. PubMed ID: 26862711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved Environment-Aware-Based Noise Reduction System for Cochlear Implant Users Based on a Knowledge Transfer Approach: Development and Usability Study.
    Li LP; Han JY; Zheng WZ; Huang RJ; Lai YH
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Oct; 23(10):e25460. PubMed ID: 34709193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sparse Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Strategy for Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Lutman ME; Ewert SD; Li G; Bleeck S
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Mandarin tone and speech perception between advanced combination encoder and continuous interleaved sampling speech-processing strategies in children.
    Hwang CF; Chen HC; Yang CH; Peng JP; Weng CH
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2012; 33(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 21982716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coding of Electrical Stimulation Patterns for Binaural Sound Coding Strategies for Cochlear Implants.
    Hinrichs R; Gajecki T; Ostermann J; Nogueira W
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():4168-4172. PubMed ID: 31946788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deep learning restores speech intelligibility in multi-talker interference for cochlear implant users.
    Borjigin A; Kokkinakis K; Bharadwaj HM; Stohl JS
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):13241. PubMed ID: 38853168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nucleus 24 advanced encoder conversion study: performance versus preference.
    Skinner MW; Arndt PL; Staller SJ
    Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):2S-17S. PubMed ID: 11883765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Optimized Pitch and Language Strategy in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Vandali A; Dawson P; Au A; Yu Y; Brown M; Goorevich M; Cowan R
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):555-567. PubMed ID: 30067558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Precompensating for spread of excitation in a cochlear implant coding strategy.
    Bolner F; Magits S; van Dijk B; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 395():107977. PubMed ID: 32653106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
    Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus
    Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Event-Related Potentials of Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users: Using a Semantic Oddball Paradigm in Noise.
    Voola M; Wedekind A; Nguyen AT; Marinovic W; Rajan G; Tavora-Vieira D
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(4):280-293. PubMed ID: 36940674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a New Algorithm to Optimize Audibility in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Holden LK; Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Dwyer NY; Stein AL; Litvak LM
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):990-1000. PubMed ID: 30418283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.