These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37030808)
21. Combination and Comparison of Sound Coding Strategies Using Cochlear Implant Simulation With Mandarin Speech. Huang EH; Wu CM; Lin HC IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2021; 29():2407-2416. PubMed ID: 34767509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Deep Learning-Based Noise Reduction Approach to Improve Speech Intelligibility for Cochlear Implant Recipients. Lai YH; Tsao Y; Lu X; Chen F; Su YT; Chen KC; Chen YH; Chen LC; Po-Hung Li L; Lee CH Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):795-809. PubMed ID: 29360687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Benefits of Bilateral Hearing on the Telephone for Cochlear Implant Recipients. Miller S; Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Agrawal S; Koch D; Neumann S J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):180-185. PubMed ID: 33873219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing. Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of front-end processing on cochlear implant performance of children. Wolfe J; Schafer EC; John A; Hudson M Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 21436756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation on Binaural Listening Tasks for Younger and Older Adults. Smeal M; Snapp H; Ausili S; Holcomb M; Prentiss S Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(5):377-387. PubMed ID: 35636400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Experimental Investigation of Acoustic Features to Optimize Intelligibility in Cochlear Implants. Henry F; Parsi A; Glavin M; Jones E Sensors (Basel); 2023 Aug; 23(17):. PubMed ID: 37688009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Optimization of Sound Coding Strategies to Make Singing Music More Accessible for Cochlear Implant Users. Tahmasebi S; Segovia-Martinez M; Nogueira W Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165221148022. PubMed ID: 36628453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Formant frequency discrimination with a fine structure sound coding strategy for cochlear implants. Liepins R; Kaider A; Honeder C; Auinger AB; Dahm V; Riss D; Arnoldner C Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 392():107970. PubMed ID: 32339775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study. Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. From hearing with a cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid (CI/HA) to hearing with two cochlear implants (CI/CI): a within-subject design comparison. Luntz M; Egra-Dagan D; Attias J; Yehudai N; Most T; Shpak T Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1682-90. PubMed ID: 25275862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users. Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Perceptual organization of sequential stimuli in cochlear implant listeners: A temporal processing approach. Saki N; Nikakhlagh S; Mirmomeni G; Bayat A Int Tinnitus J; 2019 Jan; 23(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 31469526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study. Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Speech perception with F0mod, a cochlear implant pitch coding strategy. Francart T; Osses A; Wouters J Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 25697275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Intelligibility in speech maskers with a binaural cochlear implant sound coding strategy inspired by the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex. Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Gorospe JM; Ruiz SSC; Benito F; Wilson BS Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():134-137. PubMed ID: 28188882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants. Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Benefits of Bimodal Stimulation. van Loon MC; Smits C; Smit CF; Hensen EF; Merkus P Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jul; 38(6):e100-e106. PubMed ID: 28441230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. Buchman CA; Herzog JA; McJunkin JL; Wick CC; Durakovic N; Firszt JB; Kallogjeri D; JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Oct; 146(10):916-924. PubMed ID: 32857113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]