160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37032273)
21. Understanding social oocyte freezing in Italy: a scoping survey on university female students' awareness and attitudes.
Tozzo P; Fassina A; Nespeca P; Spigarolo G; Caenazzo L
Life Sci Soc Policy; 2019 May; 15(1):3. PubMed ID: 31049743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Examining willingness to donate frozen oocytes among women of reproductive age.
Duncan JP; Caughey LE; White KM
Reprod Biomed Online; 2023 Nov; 47(5):103294. PubMed ID: 37734120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Elective oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility decline.
Chronopoulou E; Raperport C; Sfakianakis A; Srivastava G; Homburg R
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 May; 38(5):1177-1186. PubMed ID: 33608838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Social egg freezing: the prospect of reproductive 'immortality' or a dangerous delusion?
Lockwood GM
Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Sep; 23(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 21775211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. 'I feel that injustice is being done to me': a qualitative study of women's viewpoints on the (lack of) reimbursement for social egg freezing.
De Proost M; Coene G; Nekkebroeck J; Provoost V
BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Mar; 23(1):35. PubMed ID: 35351108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Medical versus social egg freezing: the importance of future choice for women's decision-making.
De Proost M; Paton A
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2022 Dec; 40(2):145-156. PubMed ID: 35306627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Medical egg freezing: the importance of a patient-centered approach to fertility preservation.
Inhorn MC; Birenbaum-Carmeli D; Westphal LM; Doyle J; Gleicher N; Meirow D; Raanani H; Dirnfeld M; Patrizio P
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Jan; 35(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 29124460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Singapore needs to update regulation of frozen egg donation after permitting social egg freezing.
Chin AHB
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2022 Jul; 39(7):1497-1500. PubMed ID: 35653043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Knowledge and decision making about future fertility and oocyte cryopreservation among young women.
Stevenson EL; Gispanski L; Fields K; Cappadora M; Hurt M
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2021 Apr; 24(2):112-121. PubMed ID: 30623694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Elective egg freezing without medical indications.
Alteri A; Pisaturo V; Nogueira D; D'Angelo A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 May; 98(5):647-652. PubMed ID: 30758059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Awareness and attitude toward oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons: a study on women candidates for social egg freezing.
Hafezi M; Zameni N; Nemati Aghamaleki SZ; Omani-Samani R; Vesali S
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Dec; 43(4):532-540. PubMed ID: 35998044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Childless women's beliefs and knowledge about oocyte freezing for social and medical reasons.
Daniluk JC; Koert E
Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2313-20. PubMed ID: 27591238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. "It's Just Another Added Benefit": Women's Experiences with Employment-Based Egg Freezing Programs.
Miner SA; Miller WK; Grady C; Berkman BE
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 32990510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Oocyte vitrification for elective fertility preservation: a SWOT analysis.
Gil-Arribas E; Blockeel C; Pennings G; Nekkebroeck J; Velasco JAG; Serna J; De Vos M
Reprod Biomed Online; 2022 Jun; 44(6):1005-1014. PubMed ID: 35304091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reproductive experiences of women who cryopreserved oocytes for non-medical reasons.
Hammarberg K; Kirkman M; Pritchard N; Hickey M; Peate M; McBain J; Agresta F; Bayly C; Fisher J
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):575-581. PubMed ID: 28077428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Elective egg freezing: State of the ART.
Polyakov A; Piskopos J; Rozen G
Aust J Gen Pract; 2023; 52(1-2):20-23. PubMed ID: 36796764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Decision regret among women considering planned oocyte cryopreservation: a prospective cohort study.
Jaswa EG; Pasch LA; McGough A; Wong R; Corley J; Cedars MI; Huddleston HG
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2023 Jun; 40(6):1281-1290. PubMed ID: 37058259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Oocyte or ovarian tissue banking: decision-making in women aged 35 years or older facing age-related fertility decline.
Balkenende EME; van Rooij FB; van der Veen F; Goddijn M
Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Aug; 41(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 32600943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessing reproductive choices of women and the likelihood of oocyte cryopreservation in the era of elective oocyte freezing.
Milman LW; Senapati S; Sammel MD; Cameron KD; Gracia C
Fertil Steril; 2017 May; 107(5):1214-1222.e3. PubMed ID: 28476182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Planned oocyte cryopreservation-10-15-year follow-up: return rates and cycle outcomes.
Blakemore JK; Grifo JA; DeVore SM; Hodes-Wertz B; Berkeley AS
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jun; 115(6):1511-1520. PubMed ID: 33712289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
