485 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37033728)
1. Molecular identity crisis: environmental DNA metabarcoding meets traditional taxonomy-assessing biodiversity and freshwater mussel populations (Unionidae) in Alabama.
Hauck LL; Atkinson CL; Homyack JA; Penaluna BE; Mangum C; Coble AA; Nettles J; Thornton-Frost JE; Fix MJ
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15127. PubMed ID: 37033728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of water samples as a tool for monitoring Iberian freshwater fish composition.
Corral-Lou A; Doadrio I
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0283088. PubMed ID: 37903086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of species-specific primers with potential for amplifying eDNA from imperilled freshwater unionid mussels.
Cho A; Morris T; Wilson C; Freeland J
Genome; 2016 Dec; 59(12):1141-1149. PubMed ID: 27753500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The gut microbiome of freshwater Unionidae mussels is determined by host species and is selectively retained from filtered seston.
Weingarten EA; Atkinson CL; Jackson CR
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224796. PubMed ID: 31721801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Freshwater unionid mussels threatened by predation of Round Goby (Neogobius melanostomus).
Clark KH; Iwanowicz DD; Iwanowicz LR; Mueller SJ; Wisor JM; Bradshaw-Wilson C; Schill WB; Stauffer JR; Boyer EW
Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):12859. PubMed ID: 35896697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of freshwater fish in Malaysian tropical rivers using short-read nanopore sequencing as a potential biomonitoring tool.
Munian K; Ramli FF; Othman N; Mahyudin NAA; Sariyati NH; Abdullah-Fauzi NAF; Haris H; Ilham-Norhakim ML; Abdul-Latiff MAB
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13936. PubMed ID: 38419264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. eDNA metabarcoding revealed differential structures of aquatic communities in a dynamic freshwater ecosystem shaped by habitat heterogeneity.
Xie R; Zhao G; Yang J; Wang Z; Xu Y; Zhang X; Wang Z
Environ Res; 2021 Oct; 201():111602. PubMed ID: 34214559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Testing the utility of DNA barcodes and a preliminary phylogenetic framework for Chinese freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) from the middle and lower Yangtze River.
Wu RW; Liu YT; Wang S; Liu XJ; Zanatta DT; Roe KJ; Song XL; An CT; Wu XP
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0200956. PubMed ID: 30089124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of environmental DNA in assessment of fish functional and phylogenetic diversity.
Marques V; Castagné P; Polanco A; Borrero-Pérez GH; Hocdé R; Guérin PÉ; Juhel JB; Velez L; Loiseau N; Letessier TB; Bessudo S; Valentini A; Dejean T; Mouillot D; Pellissier L; Villéger S
Conserv Biol; 2021 Dec; 35(6):1944-1956. PubMed ID: 34224158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial Representativeness of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Signal for Fish Biodiversity Assessment in a Natural Freshwater System.
Civade R; Dejean T; Valentini A; Roset N; Raymond JC; Bonin A; Taberlet P; Pont D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157366. PubMed ID: 27359116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monitoring freshwater fish communities in large rivers using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a long-term electrofishing survey.
Goutte A; Molbert N; Guérin S; Richoux R; Rocher V
J Fish Biol; 2020 Aug; 97(2):444-452. PubMed ID: 32412670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods.
Fujii K; Doi H; Matsuoka S; Nagano M; Sato H; Yamanaka H
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210357. PubMed ID: 30703107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental DNA (eDNA) Shedding and Decay Rates to Model Freshwater Mussel eDNA Transport in a River.
Sansom BJ; Sassoubre LM
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Dec; 51(24):14244-14253. PubMed ID: 29131600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using environmental DNA metabarcoding to monitor fish communities in small rivers and large brooks: Insights on the spatial scale of information.
Van Driessche C; Everts T; Neyrinck S; Halfmaerten D; Haegeman A; Ruttink T; Bonte D; Brys R
Environ Res; 2023 Jul; 228():115857. PubMed ID: 37059322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multispecies models reveal that eDNA metabarcoding is more sensitive than backpack electrofishing for conducting fish surveys in freshwater streams.
McColl-Gausden EF; Weeks AR; Coleman RA; Robinson KL; Song S; Raadik TA; Tingley R
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3111-3126. PubMed ID: 32966639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding.
Valentini A; Taberlet P; Miaud C; Civade R; Herder J; Thomsen PF; Bellemain E; Besnard A; Coissac E; Boyer F; Gaboriaud C; Jean P; Poulet N; Roset N; Copp GH; Geniez P; Pont D; Argillier C; Baudoin JM; Peroux T; Crivelli AJ; Olivier A; Acqueberge M; Le Brun M; Møller PR; Willerslev E; Dejean T
Mol Ecol; 2016 Feb; 25(4):929-42. PubMed ID: 26479867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unlocking biodiversity and conservation studies in high-diversity environments using environmental DNA (eDNA): A test with Guianese freshwater fishes.
Cilleros K; Valentini A; Allard L; Dejean T; Etienne R; Grenouillet G; Iribar A; Taberlet P; Vigouroux R; Brosse S
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jan; 19(1):27-46. PubMed ID: 29768738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of mesocosm fish and amphibian species diversity via environmental DNA metabarcoding.
Evans NT; Olds BP; Renshaw MA; Turner CR; Li Y; Jerde CL; Mahon AR; Pfrender ME; Lamberti GA; Lodge DM
Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Jan; 16(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26032773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative monitoring of diverse fish communities on a large scale combining eDNA metabarcoding and qPCR.
Pont D; Meulenbroek P; Bammer V; Dejean T; Erős T; Jean P; Lenhardt M; Nagel C; Pekarik L; Schabuss M; Stoeckle BC; Stoica E; Zornig H; Weigand A; Valentini A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Feb; 23(2):396-409. PubMed ID: 36151931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the utility of marine filter feeders for environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity monitoring.
Jeunen GJ; Cane JS; Ferreira S; Strano F; von Ammon U; Cross H; Day R; Hesseltine S; Ellis K; Urban L; Pearson N; Olmedo-Rojas P; Kardailsky A; Gemmell NJ; Lamare M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 May; 23(4):771-786. PubMed ID: 36598115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
