118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3703531)
1. Some experimental observations of responses evoked from the cochlea during two-tone stimulation.
Brown AM
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1986; 48(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 3703531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ear canal acoustic and round window electrical correlates of 2f1-f2 distortion generated in the cochlea.
Kemp DT; Brown AM
Hear Res; 1984 Jan; 13(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 6706861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic modulation of electrically evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissions in gerbil cochlea.
Ren T
Neurosci Lett; 1996 Apr; 207(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 8728476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (f2 - f1) and (2f1 - f2).
Gibian GL; Kim DO
Hear Res; 1982 Jan; 6(1):35-59. PubMed ID: 7054135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.
Siegel JH; Kim DO; Molnar CE
J Neurophysiol; 1982 Feb; 47(2):303-28. PubMed ID: 7062102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
Abel C; Kössl M
J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrophysiological responses in guinea pig cochlea to low frequency sound stimuli: distortion of cochlear microphonic (CM) wave form.
Maehara N; Sadamoto T; Yamamura K
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1983; 51(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 6684037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tuning curves of the difference tone auditory nerve neurophonic.
Henry KR
Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):160-7. PubMed ID: 8970824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Offset tuning curves generated by simultaneous masking are more finely tuned than those generated by forward masking.
Henry KR
Hear Res; 1986; 24(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 3771377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
Lai J; Bartlett EL
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations.
Kim DO
Hear Res; 1980 Jun; 2(3-4):297-317. PubMed ID: 7410234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of the cochlear microphonic to a low-frequency tone embedded in filtered noise.
Chertoff ME; Earl BR; Diaz FJ; Sorensen JL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3351-62. PubMed ID: 23145616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of 2f1-f2 otoacoustic emissions in the rat.
Lenoir M; Puel JL
Hear Res; 1987; 29(2-3):265-71. PubMed ID: 3624087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stimulated acoustic emissions in the ear canal of the gerbil.
Schmiedt RA; Adams JC
Hear Res; 1981 Nov; 5(2-3):295-305. PubMed ID: 7309644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intermodulation distortion in the cochlea: could basal vibration be the major cause of round window CM distortion?
Brown AM; Kemp DT
Hear Res; 1985; 19(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 4066519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea.
Cooper NP; Rhode WS
J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jul; 78(1):261-70. PubMed ID: 9242278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distortion product emissions in humans. I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects.
Lonsbury-Martin BL; Harris FP; Stagner BB; Hawkins MD; Martin GK
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1990 May; 147():3-14. PubMed ID: 2110797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: a comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils.
Brown AM
Hear Res; 1987 Nov; 31(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 3429348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Effects of acoustic overstimulation of 2F1-F2 distortion product in cochlear microphonics].
Yoshida M; Aoyagi M; Makishima K
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1994 Apr; 97(4):680-3. PubMed ID: 8189316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
