These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3703531)

  • 1. Some experimental observations of responses evoked from the cochlea during two-tone stimulation.
    Brown AM
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1986; 48(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 3703531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ear canal acoustic and round window electrical correlates of 2f1-f2 distortion generated in the cochlea.
    Kemp DT; Brown AM
    Hear Res; 1984 Jan; 13(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 6706861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic modulation of electrically evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissions in gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T
    Neurosci Lett; 1996 Apr; 207(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 8728476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (f2 - f1) and (2f1 - f2).
    Gibian GL; Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1982 Jan; 6(1):35-59. PubMed ID: 7054135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.
    Siegel JH; Kim DO; Molnar CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1982 Feb; 47(2):303-28. PubMed ID: 7062102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological responses in guinea pig cochlea to low frequency sound stimuli: distortion of cochlear microphonic (CM) wave form.
    Maehara N; Sadamoto T; Yamamura K
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1983; 51(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 6684037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tuning curves of the difference tone auditory nerve neurophonic.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):160-7. PubMed ID: 8970824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Offset tuning curves generated by simultaneous masking are more finely tuned than those generated by forward masking.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1986; 24(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 3771377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations.
    Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1980 Jun; 2(3-4):297-317. PubMed ID: 7410234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of the cochlear microphonic to a low-frequency tone embedded in filtered noise.
    Chertoff ME; Earl BR; Diaz FJ; Sorensen JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3351-62. PubMed ID: 23145616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of 2f1-f2 otoacoustic emissions in the rat.
    Lenoir M; Puel JL
    Hear Res; 1987; 29(2-3):265-71. PubMed ID: 3624087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stimulated acoustic emissions in the ear canal of the gerbil.
    Schmiedt RA; Adams JC
    Hear Res; 1981 Nov; 5(2-3):295-305. PubMed ID: 7309644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intermodulation distortion in the cochlea: could basal vibration be the major cause of round window CM distortion?
    Brown AM; Kemp DT
    Hear Res; 1985; 19(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 4066519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea.
    Cooper NP; Rhode WS
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jul; 78(1):261-70. PubMed ID: 9242278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distortion product emissions in humans. I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects.
    Lonsbury-Martin BL; Harris FP; Stagner BB; Hawkins MD; Martin GK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1990 May; 147():3-14. PubMed ID: 2110797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: a comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils.
    Brown AM
    Hear Res; 1987 Nov; 31(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 3429348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effects of acoustic overstimulation of 2F1-F2 distortion product in cochlear microphonics].
    Yoshida M; Aoyagi M; Makishima K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1994 Apr; 97(4):680-3. PubMed ID: 8189316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.