These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37036674)
1. The influence of event segmentation by context on stimulus-response binding. Qiu R; Möller M; Koch I; Frings C; Mayr S J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Mar; 49(3):355-369. PubMed ID: 37036674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contextual modulation of prime response retrieval processes: Evidence from auditory negative priming. Mayr S; Möller M; Buchner A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1918-1931. PubMed ID: 30094603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence of vocal and manual event files in auditory negative priming. Mayr S; Möller M; Buchner A Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 21310694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory spatial negative priming: what is remembered of irrelevant sounds and their locations? Mayr S; Möller M; Buchner A Psychol Res; 2014; 78(3):423-38. PubMed ID: 24121864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attentional control and priming: The distractor set hypothesis. Chao HF J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Mar; 50(3):347-361. PubMed ID: 37307325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrieval of event files can be conceptually mediated. Frings C; Moeller B; Rothermund K Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 May; 75(4):700-9. PubMed ID: 23392625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the robustness of prime response retrieval processes: evidence from auditory negative priming without probe interference. Mayr S; Buchner A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):335-57. PubMed ID: 23799324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Target localization among concurrent sound sources: no evidence for the inhibition of previous distractor responses. Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jan; 75(1):132-44. PubMed ID: 23077027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The time-course of distractor processing in auditory spatial negative priming. Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A Psychol Res; 2016 Sep; 80(5):744-56. PubMed ID: 26233234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identity-Based Crossmodal Negative Priming: Aftereffects of Ignoring in One Sensory Modality on Responding to Another Sensory Modality. Wesslein AK; Frings C Multisens Res; 2020 Aug; 33(7):703-721. PubMed ID: 32101789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attenuation of auditory ERPs to action-sound coincidences is not explained by voluntary allocation of attention. Horváth J Psychophysiology; 2013 Mar; 50(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 23316925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attention meets binding: only attended distractors are used for the retrieval of event files. Moeller B; Frings C Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):959-78. PubMed ID: 24627211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Saliency determines the integration of contextual information into stimulus-response episodes. Qiu R; Möller M; Koch I; Mayr S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1264-1285. PubMed ID: 35048312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporal and sequential negative priming generalise across visual and auditory modalities and are dependent on relative rather than absolute speed. Kahan TA; Slowiaczek LM; Harrison AC; Bogue CM Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Apr; 76(4):922-941. PubMed ID: 35488462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]