These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37037135)

  • 1. Comparison of derived correction factors for effects of ion recombination and photon beam quality index following TG-51 and TRS-398 dosimetry protocols.
    Hosseini Bojdani SM; Baghani HR; Robatjazi M; Andreoli S; Azadegan B
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Jul; 197():110796. PubMed ID: 37037135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the dosimeter-specific corrections for influence quantities of some parallel-plate ionization chambers in conventional electron beam dosimetry.
    Baghani HR; Robatjazi M; Andreoli S
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2022 Jan; 179():110031. PubMed ID: 34801928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
    Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
    Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reference dose determination in 60Co and high-energy radiotherapy photon beams by using Farmer-type cylindrical ionization chambers - an experimental investigation.
    Swanpalmer J
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 May; 6(4):045003. PubMed ID: 33444264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dosimetric evaluation of the IAEA-AAPM TRS483 code of practice for dosimetry of small static fields used in conventional linac beams and comparison with IAEA TRS-398, AAPM TG51, and TG51 Addendum protocols.
    Huq MS; Hwang MS; Teo TP; Jang SY; Heron DE; Lalonde RJ
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 30009526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of AAPM Addendum to TG-51, IAEA TRS-398, and JSMP 12: Calibration of photon beams in water.
    Kinoshita N; Oguchi H; Nishimoto Y; Adachi T; Shioura H; Kimura H; Doi K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):271-278. PubMed ID: 28771919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the performance characteristics of some ion chamber dosimeters in high dose per pulse intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy.
    Baghani HR; Robatjazi M; Mahdavi SR; Hosseini Aghdam SR
    Phys Med; 2019 Feb; 58():81-89. PubMed ID: 30824155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Absorbed dose measurement of photon beam with Farmer-type ionization chambers in Japanese dosimetry protocols].
    Fujisaki T; Hiraoka T; Osawa A; Nakajima M; Kuwabara A; Yokoyama K; Saitoh H; Tomaru T; Inada T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2004; 24(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 15226645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modified calibration protocols in electron beam dosimetry: comparison with IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51.
    Yulinar C; Assegab MI; Wibowo WE; Pawiro SA
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Jul; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 37442101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Almond PR; Biggs PJ; Coursey BM; Hanson WF; Huq MS; Nath R; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1847-70. PubMed ID: 10505874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The perturbation correction factors for cylindrical ionization chambers in high-energy photon beams.
    Yoshiyama F; Araki F; Ono T
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2010 Jul; 3(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 20821090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of IPSM 1990 photon dosimetry code of practice with IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51.
    Castrillón SV; Henríquez FC
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 10(1):136-146. PubMed ID: 19223831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the recommendations of the AAPM TG-51 and TG-51 addendum reference dosimetry protocols.
    McCaw TJ; Hwang MS; Jang SY; Huq MS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 18(4):140-143. PubMed ID: 28574211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of the cable effect in megavoltage photon beam by measurement and Monte Carlo simulation.
    Yamauchi R; Igari M; Kasai Y; Hariu M; Suda Y; Kawachi T; Katayose T; Mizuno N; Miyasaka R; Saitoh H
    Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):5324-5332. PubMed ID: 32786073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ion recombination and polarity corrections for small-volume ionization chambers in high-dose-rate, flattening-filter-free pulsed photon beams.
    Hyun MA; Miller JR; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):618-627. PubMed ID: 28001291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for two cylindrical ionization chambers in photon beams.
    Alissa M; Zink K; Tessier F; Schoenfeld AA; Czarnecki D
    Phys Med; 2022 Feb; 94():17-23. PubMed ID: 34972070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.