These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37037730)

  • 1. Use of relative motion orthoses from the perspective of hand-injured patients: A qualitative study.
    Arslan ÖB; Şahin Y; Sığırtmaç İC; Yildiz B; Ayhan E; Öksüz Ç
    J Hand Ther; 2023; 36(2):425-432. PubMed ID: 37037730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photovoice to explore the patient experience of a relative motion orthosis following a hand injury.
    Cole T; Jamwal R; Hirth MJ
    J Hand Ther; 2023; 36(2):433-447. PubMed ID: 37059599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of exercise relative motion orthoses to improve proximal interphalangeal joint motion: A survey of Australian hand therapy practice.
    Yates SE; Glinsky JV; Hirth MJ; Fuller JT
    J Hand Ther; 2023; 36(2):414-424. PubMed ID: 37031058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Partnering with people living with rheumatoid arthritis for care of their hands: Four case reports using relative motion orthoses.
    Feehan LM; Hoens A; Howell JW
    J Hand Ther; 2023; 36(2):456-465. PubMed ID: 37037732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prescription of exercise relative motion orthoses to improve limited proximal interphalangeal joint movement: A prospective, multi-center, consecutive case series.
    Wajon S; Howell JW
    J Hand Ther; 2023; 36(2):378-388. PubMed ID: 35039211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative motion orthoses for early active motion after finger extensor and flexor tendon repairs: A systematic review.
    Shaw AV; Verma Y; Tucker S; Jain A; Furniss D
    J Hand Ther; 2023; 36(2):332-346. PubMed ID: 37037728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do current upper limb orthotic classification systems help clinicians choose and design effective orthoses? A scoping review with expert interviews.
    Farzad M; MacDermid J; Ferreira L; Szekeres M; Cuypers S; Shafiee E;
    J Hand Ther; 2024; 37(1):60-69. PubMed ID: 37778877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative motion orthoses: fabrication tips.
    Schwartz DA
    J Hand Ther; 2023; 36(2):486-493. PubMed ID: 37032245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facilitators and Barriers to Wearing Hand Orthoses by Adults with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Mixed Methods Study Design.
    Houwen-van Opstal SLS; van den Elzen YMEM; Jansen M; Willemsen MAAP; Cup EHC; De Groot IJM
    J Neuromuscul Dis; 2020; 7(4):467-475. PubMed ID: 32568104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three lumbar orthoses using motion assessment during task performance.
    Krag MH; Fox MS J; Haugh LD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2359-67. PubMed ID: 14560084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grip strength and finger dexterity across five styles of commercial wrist orthoses.
    Stern EB
    Am J Occup Ther; 1996 Jan; 50(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 8644834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mobility experiences of adult lower limb orthosis users: a focus group study.
    Balkman GS; Hafner BJ; Rosen RE; Morgan SJ
    Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Dec; 44(25):7904-7915. PubMed ID: 34807780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D printing technology applied to orthosis manufacturing: narrative review.
    Choo YJ; Boudier-Revéret M; Chang MC
    Ann Palliat Med; 2020 Nov; 9(6):4262-4270. PubMed ID: 33040564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of Thoracolumbar Bracing in Spinal Immobilization: Precise Assessment of Gross, Intersegmental, and Segmental Spinal Motion Restriction by a 3D Kinematic System.
    Lang G; Hirschmüller A; Patermann S; Eichelberger P; Strohm P; Baur H; Südkamp NP; Herget GW
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e128-e146. PubMed ID: 29729467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are the outcomes of relative motion extension orthoses non-inferior and cost-effective compared with dynamic extension orthoses for management of zones V-VI finger extensor tendon repairs: A randomized controlled trial.
    Bűhler M; Gwynne-Jones D; Chin M; Woodside J; Gough J; Wilson R; Abbott JH
    J Hand Ther; 2023; 36(2):363-377. PubMed ID: 37045642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exercise relative motion orthoses: Use of the pencil test and variations of its use for assessing and managing different finger conditions.
    Howell JW; Ewald SG; Schwartz DA
    J Hand Ther; 2023; 36(2):473-478. PubMed ID: 36914489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Range of motion at the wrist: a comparison study of four wrist extension orthoses and the free hand.
    Collier SE; Thomas JJ
    Am J Occup Ther; 2002; 56(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 11905302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implications of providing wrist-hand orthoses for children with cerebral palsy: evidence from a randomised controlled trial.
    Imms C; Wallen M; Elliott C; Hoare B; Greaves S; Randall M; Orsini F
    Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Jun; 45(12):2046-2056. PubMed ID: 35649128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The immediate and short-term effects of a wrist extension orthosis on upper-extremity kinematics and range of shoulder motion.
    King S; Thomas JJ; Rice MS
    Am J Occup Ther; 2003; 57(5):517-24. PubMed ID: 14527113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses.
    Bell KM; Frazier EC; Shively CM; Hartman RA; Ulibarri JC; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF
    Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18504164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.