128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37039078)
41. The safety of two Bacillus probiotic strains for human use.
Sorokulova IB; Pinchuk IV; Denayrolles M; Osipova IG; Huang JM; Cutting SM; Urdaci MC
Dig Dis Sci; 2008 Apr; 53(4):954-63. PubMed ID: 17934835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. New Insights into the Virulence Traits and Antibiotic Resistance of Enterococci Isolated from Diverse Probiotic Products.
Deng F; Chen Y; Zhou X; Xiao H; Sun T; Deng Y; Wen J
Microorganisms; 2021 Mar; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 33807433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Probiotics as functional food products: manufacture and approaches to evaluating of the effectiveness].
Markova IuM; Sheveleva SA
Vopr Pitan; 2014; 83(4):4-14. PubMed ID: 25549469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. How to select a probiotic? A review and update of methods and criteria.
de Melo Pereira GV; de Oliveira Coelho B; Magalhães Júnior AI; Thomaz-Soccol V; Soccol CR
Biotechnol Adv; 2018 Dec; 36(8):2060-2076. PubMed ID: 30266342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The Development of High-Quality Multispecies Probiotic Formulations: From Bench to Market.
Grumet L; Tromp Y; Stiegelbauer V
Nutrients; 2020 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 32824147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Genomic and phenotypic assessments of safety and probiotic properties of Streptococcus macedonicus strains of dairy origin.
Tarrah A; da Silva Duarte V; Pakroo S; Corich V; Giacomini A
Food Res Int; 2020 Apr; 130():108931. PubMed ID: 32156379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Probiotics: from the lab to the consumer].
Rodríguez JM
Nutr Hosp; 2015 Feb; 31 Suppl 1():33-47. PubMed ID: 25659052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Assessment of the Safety of Lactobacillus casei IMV B-7280 Probiotic Strain on a Mouse Model.
L M L; L P B; S G G; L O S; O M D; R V B; L M S; M Ya S
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins; 2021 Dec; 13(6):1644-1657. PubMed ID: 33876388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Genome based safety assessment for Bacillus coagulans strain LBSC (DSM 17654) for probiotic application.
Saroj DB; Gupta AK
Int J Food Microbiol; 2020 Apr; 318():108523. PubMed ID: 31964505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Safety assessment of the Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588® probiotic strain including evaluation of antimicrobial sensitivity and presence of Clostridium toxin genes in vitro and teratogenicity in vivo.
Isa K; Oka K; Beauchamp N; Sato M; Wada K; Ohtani K; Nakanishi S; McCartney E; Tanaka M; Shimizu T; Kamiya S; Kruger C; Takahashi M
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2016 Aug; 35(8):818-32. PubMed ID: 26437792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea.
Guo Q; Goldenberg JZ; Humphrey C; El Dib R; Johnston BC
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Apr; 4(4):CD004827. PubMed ID: 31039287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Safety Assessment of Lactobacillus helveticus KLDS1.8701 Based on Whole Genome Sequencing and Oral Toxicity Studies.
Li B; Jin D; Etareri Evivie S; Li N; Yan F; Zhao L; Liu F; Huo G
Toxins (Basel); 2017 Sep; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 28946645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Assessing the Risk of Probiotic Dietary Supplements in the Context of Antibiotic Resistance.
Zheng M; Zhang R; Tian X; Zhou X; Pan X; Wong A
Front Microbiol; 2017; 8():908. PubMed ID: 28579981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Functionality of probiotics - potential for product development.
Dekker J; Collett M; Prasad J; Gopal P
Forum Nutr; 2007; 60():196-208. PubMed ID: 17684416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A potentially probiotic strain of Enterococcus faecalis from human milk that is avirulent, antibiotic sensitive, and nonbreaching of the gut barrier.
Anjum J; Zaidi A; Barrett K; Tariq M
Arch Microbiol; 2022 Feb; 204(2):158. PubMed ID: 35107663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Genome sequence and probiotic potential of newly isolated Enterococcus durans strain MN187066.
Enuh BM; Gedikli S; Aytar Çelik P; Çabuk A
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2023 Mar; 76(3):. PubMed ID: 36918202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity evaluation of probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae RC016: a 60-day subchronic oral toxicity study in rats.
González Pereyra ML; Dogi C; Torres Lisa A; Wittouck P; Ortíz M; Escobar F; Bagnis G; Yaciuk R; Poloni L; Torres A; Dalcero AM; Cavaglieri LR
J Appl Microbiol; 2014 Sep; 117(3):824-33. PubMed ID: 24849144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Antimicrobial resistance of Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from commercial probiotic products used in cattle and swine.
Amachawadi RG; Giok F; Shi X; Soto J; Narayanan SK; Tokach MD; Apley MD; Nagaraja TG
J Anim Sci; 2018 Apr; 96(3):912-920. PubMed ID: 29584914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Antibiotics and Host-Tailored Probiotics Similarly Modulate Effects on the Developing Avian Microbiome, Mycobiome, and Host Gene Expression.
Ward TL; Weber BP; Mendoza KM; Danzeisen JL; Llop K; Lang K; Clayton JB; Grace E; Brannon J; Radovic I; Beauclaire M; Heisel TJ; Knights D; Cardona C; Kogut M; Johnson C; Noll SL; Arsenault R; Reed KM; Johnson TJ
mBio; 2019 Oct; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 31615957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. ICMR-DBT guidelines for evaluation of probiotics in food.
; ;
Indian J Med Res; 2011 Jul; 134(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 21808130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
