These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37039529)

  • 1. Machine Learning and Risk Assessment: Random Forest Does Not Outperform Logistic Regression in the Prediction of Sexual Recidivism.
    Etzler S; Schönbrodt FD; Pargent F; Eher R; Rettenberger M
    Assessment; 2024 Mar; 31(2):460-481. PubMed ID: 37039529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the predictive accuracy of structured and unstructured risk assessment methods for the prediction of recidivism in individuals convicted of sexual and violent offense.
    Wertz M; Schobel S; Schiltz K; Rettenberger M
    Psychol Assess; 2023 Feb; 35(2):152-164. PubMed ID: 36455027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic Risk Assessment of Sexual Offenders: Validity and Dimensional Structure of the Stable-2007.
    Etzler S; Eher R; Rettenberger M
    Assessment; 2020 Jun; 27(4):822-839. PubMed ID: 29405755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unguided clinical and actuarial assessment of re-offending risk: a direct comparison with sex offenders in Denmark.
    Bengtson S; Långström N
    Sex Abuse; 2007 Jun; 19(2):135-53. PubMed ID: 17534713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A field study of acute dynamic risk assessment in individuals convicted of sexual offenses.
    Nitsche K; Etzler S; Balas J; Eher R; Rettenberger M
    Psychol Assess; 2022 Jun; 34(6):583-594. PubMed ID: 35298221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: The psychometric properties of the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG).
    Rettenberger M; Rice ME; Harris GT; Eher R
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):624-638. PubMed ID: 28594206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are mental disorders associated with recidivism in men convicted of sexual offenses?
    Biedermann L; Eher R; Rettenberger M; Gaunersdorfer K; Turner D
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2023 Jul; 148(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 36932913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Exploratory Study of Recidivism Risk Assessment Instruments for Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offenses in Singapore.
    Tsao IT; Chu CM
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Mar; 33(2):157-175. PubMed ID: 31674276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Less Is More: Using Static-2002R Subscales to Predict Violent and General Recidivism Among Sexual Offenders.
    Babchishin KM; Hanson RK; Blais J
    Sex Abuse; 2016 Apr; 28(3):187-217. PubMed ID: 25667228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Static-99R Is Not Valid For Women: Predictive Validity in 739 Females Who Have Sexually Offended.
    Marshall E; Miller HA; Cortoni F; Helmus LM
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Sep; 33(6):631-653. PubMed ID: 32659180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Substance abuse among high-risk sexual offenders: do measures of lifetime history of substance abuse add to the prediction of recidivism over actuarial risk assessment instruments?
    Looman J; Abracen J
    J Interpers Violence; 2011 Mar; 26(4):683-700. PubMed ID: 20587448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors Predicting Desistance From Reoffending: A Validation Study of the SAPROF in Sexual Offenders.
    Yoon D; Turner D; Klein V; Rettenberger M; Eher R; Briken P
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 Feb; 62(3):697-716. PubMed ID: 27531703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive and incremental validity of the Static-99, Static-99R, and STABLE-2007 for sexual recidivism: A diagnostic test accuracy network meta-analysis (DTA-NMA).
    Holper L; Cerullo E; Mokros A; Habermeyer E
    Psychol Assess; 2024 Feb; 36(2):134-146. PubMed ID: 38059959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing the Static-99R as a Global Screen for Risk of Sex Crime Recidivism in a Norwegian Routine Sample.
    Sandbukt IJ; Skardhamar T; Kristoffersen R; Friestad C
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Sep; 33(6):725-742. PubMed ID: 32830607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The 2015 Static-99R: Alternative Recidivism Tables for High-Risk Offenders.
    Elwood RW; Kelley SM; Mundt JC
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2017 Oct; 61(14):1593-1605. PubMed ID: 26758206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What Sexual Recidivism Rates Are Associated With Static-99R and Static-2002R Scores?
    Hanson RK; Thornton D; Helmus LM; Babchishin KM
    Sex Abuse; 2016 Apr; 28(3):218-52. PubMed ID: 25810478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting Sexual Recidivism.
    Ozkan T; Clipper SJ; Piquero AR; Baglivio M; Wolff K
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Jun; 32(4):375-399. PubMed ID: 31169067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the predictive properties of nine sex offender risk assessment instruments.
    Smid WJ; Kamphuis JH; Wever EC; Van Beek DJ
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):691-703. PubMed ID: 24773035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Updated 5-year and new 10-year sexual recidivism rate norms for Static-99R with routine/complete samples.
    Lee SC; Hanson RK
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Feb; 45(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 33734747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Actuarial assessment of sex offender recidivism risk: a cross-validation of the RRASOR and the Static-99 in Sweden.
    Sjöstedt G; Långström N
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Dec; 25(6):629-45. PubMed ID: 11771638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.