BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37039755)

  • 1. Pelvic Exam Laws in the United States: A Systematic Review.
    Plantak M; Alter SM; Clayton LM; Hughes PG; Shih RD; Mendiola M; Solano JJ
    Am J Law Med; 2022 Dec; 48(4):412-419. PubMed ID: 37039755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Not just "bodies with vaginas": A Kantian defense of pelvic exam consent laws.
    Seybold SL
    Bioethics; 2022 Nov; 36(9):940-947. PubMed ID: 36067372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consent for the Pelvic Examination Under Anesthesia by Medical Students: Recommendations by the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
    Hammoud MM; Spector-Bagdady K; O'Reilly M; Major C; Baecher-Lind L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 134(6):1303-1307. PubMed ID: 31764743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regulation of Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Systematic Review of US State Laws.
    Livingston R; Wu C; Mu K; Coffey MJ
    J ECT; 2018 Mar; 34(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 28991068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consent for Intimate Exams on Unconscious Patients: Sharpening Legislative Efforts.
    Friesen P; Wilson RF; Kim S; Goedken J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Jan; 52(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 35143067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pelvic and breast examination skills curricula in United States medical schools: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors.
    Dugoff L; Pradhan A; Casey P; Dalrymple JL; Abbott JF; Buery-Joyner SD; Chuang A; Cullimore AJ; Forstein DA; Hampton BS; Kaczmarczyk JM; Katz NT; Nuthalapaty FS; Page-Ramsey SM; Wolf A; Hueppchen NA
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Dec; 16(1):314. PubMed ID: 27986086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No. 385-Indications for Pelvic Examination.
    Evans D; Goldstein S; Loewy A; Altman AD
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Aug; 41(8):1221-1234. PubMed ID: 31331610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A New Layer of Informed Consent: Discussions and Documentation Regarding Sensitive Examinations in Surgery.
    Wilson LR; Tanner C; Wong SL
    Ann Surg Open; 2022 Mar; 3(1):e120. PubMed ID: 37600086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Required examinations and tests before initiating contraception: Provider practices from a national cross-sectional survey.
    Krashin JW; Zapata LB; Morgan IA; Tepper NK; Jatlaoui TC; Frederiksen BN; Whiteman MK; Curtis KM
    Contraception; 2021 Apr; 103(4):232-238. PubMed ID: 33454373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consent for Pelvic Examinations Under Anesthesia by Medical Students: Historical Arguments and Steps Forward.
    Cundall HL; MacPhedran SE; Arora KS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 134(6):1298-1302. PubMed ID: 31764742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Routine pelvic examinations: A descriptive cross-sectional survey of women's attitudes and beliefs after new guidelines.
    Kling JM; Vegunta S; Al-Badri M; Faubion SS; Fields HE; Shah AA; Wallace MR; Ruddy BE; Bryan MJ; Temkit M; MacLaughlin KL
    Prev Med; 2017 Jan; 94():60-64. PubMed ID: 27856341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonindicated pelvic examinations during contraceptive encounters: Prevalence and provider variations.
    Ellison J; Cole MB; Hanchate AD; Kazis L; Lindsay S
    Contraception; 2021 Apr; 103(4):239-245. PubMed ID: 33373613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
    Harrison LK; Naylor KL
    Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.
    Taylor A; Staruchowicz L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(42 Suppl):1-22. PubMed ID: 27820153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Review of United States laws pertaining to the recovery and analysis of human skeletal remains.
    Carter ML; Newman JL; Seidemann RM; Reedy EA
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Sep; 67(5):1876-1889. PubMed ID: 35775200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Addressing Anxiety and Fear during the Female Pelvic Examination.
    O'Laughlin DJ; Strelow B; Fellows N; Kelsey E; Peters S; Stevens J; Tweedy J
    J Prim Care Community Health; 2021; 12():2150132721992195. PubMed ID: 33525968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Women's provider preferences for basic gynecology care in a large health maintenance organization.
    Schmittdiel J; Selby JV; Grumbach K; Quesenberry CP
    J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 1999; 8(6):825-33. PubMed ID: 10495263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.