135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37039755)
41. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Adolescents' knowledge of and attitudes toward Minnesota laws concerning adolescent medical care.
Loertscher L; Simmons PS
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 19(3):205-7. PubMed ID: 16731414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Differences in teaching female and male intimate examinations: A qualitative study.
Gleisner J; Siwe K
Med Educ; 2020 Apr; 54(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 32043635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Health Care Efficiencies: Consolidation and Alternative Models vs. Health Care and Antitrust Regulation - Irreconcilable Differences?
King MW
Am J Law Med; 2017 Nov; 43(4):426-467. PubMed ID: 29452560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Caring for affective subjects produced in intimate healthcare examinations.
Gleisner J; Johnson E
Health (London); 2023 May; 27(3):303-322. PubMed ID: 34041941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Abortion counseling: to benefit maternal health.
Steinberg TN
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):483-517. PubMed ID: 2699161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluation of the usefulness of the 'hormones with optional pelvic exam' programme offered at a family planning clinic.
Armstrong L; Zabel E; Beydoun HA
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2012 Aug; 17(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 22524280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Mapping Housing Laws in the United States: A Resource for Evaluating Housing Policies' Impacts on Health.
Moran-McCabe K; Waimberg J; Ghorashi A
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2020; 26 Suppl 2, Advancing Legal Epidemiology():S29-S36. PubMed ID: 32004220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Creating a more positive patient experience of pelvic examination.
Carter S; Rad M; Schwarz B; Van Sell S; Marshall D
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract; 2013 Nov; 25(11):611-8. PubMed ID: 24170536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Wiretap laws and the perioperative physician - The current state of affairs.
de Meneses FGA; Mulcahy BP; Brook K
J Clin Anesth; 2023 Oct; 89():111178. PubMed ID: 37327714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Ethics versus education: pelvic exams on anesthetized women.
Schniederjan S; Donovan GK
J Okla State Med Assoc; 2005 Aug; 98(8):386-8. PubMed ID: 16206868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The first pelvic examination for an adolescent: is this rite of passage used to its full potential?
Siwe K; Wijma B
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 25(5):357-63. PubMed ID: 24018872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The Associations Between Older Driver Licensure Laws with Travel and Passenger Behaviors Among Adults Aged 65 Years or Older (United States, 2003-2017).
Shen S; Ramirez M; Hamann CJ; Morris N; Peek-Asa C; Zhu M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 33668722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Women's beliefs about the purpose and value of routine pelvic examinations.
Norrell LL; Kuppermann M; Moghadassi MN; Sawaya GF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):86.e1-86.e6. PubMed ID: 28040449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Routine bimanual pelvic examinations: practices and beliefs of US obstetrician-gynecologists.
Henderson JT; Harper CC; Gutin S; Saraiya M; Chapman J; Sawaya GF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb; 208(2):109.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23159688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. When legislators play doctor: the ethics of mandatory preabortion ultrasound examinations.
Minkoff H; Ecker J
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 120(3):647-9. PubMed ID: 22914476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Routine vaginal examinations for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term.
Downe S; Gyte GM; Dahlen HG; Singata M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Jul; (7):CD010088. PubMed ID: 23857468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Do new guidelines and technology make the routine pelvic examination obsolete?
Westhoff CL; Jones HE; Guiahi M
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Jan; 20(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 21194307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Framing patient consent for student involvement in pelvic examination: a dual model of autonomy.
Carson-Stevens A; Davies MM; Jones R; Chik AD; Robbé IJ; Fiander AN
J Med Ethics; 2013 Nov; 39(11):676-80. PubMed ID: 23322682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
