These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37039859)

  • 1. Five-year surgical outcomes of transvaginal apical approaches in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse.
    Meyer I; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Richter HE
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Sep; 34(9):2171-2181. PubMed ID: 37039859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S;
    JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of native tissue transvaginal apical approaches in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.
    Meyer I; Whitworth RE; Lukacz ES; Smith AL; Sung VW; Visco AG; Ackenbom MF; Wai CY; Mazloomdoost D; Gantz MG; Richter HE;
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2155-2164. PubMed ID: 32146521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.
    Barber MD; Brubaker L; Burgio KL; Richter HE; Nygaard I; Weidner AC; Menefee SA; Lukacz ES; Norton P; Schaffer J; Nguyen JN; Borello-France D; Goode PS; Jakus-Waldman S; Spino C; Warren LK; Gantz MG; Meikle SF;
    JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(10):1023-34. PubMed ID: 24618964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
    Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Schulten SF; Detollenaere RJ; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Van Eijndhoven HW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Richter HE; Sridhar A; Nager CW; Komesu YM; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Rardin C; Visco A; Mazloomdoost D; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 228(1):63.e1-63.e16. PubMed ID: 35931131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of the anterior approach versus posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Bastani P; Tayebi S; Ghabousian A; Salehi-Pourmehr H; Hajebrahimi S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1857-1862. PubMed ID: 35347369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surgical repair of vaginal vault prolapse; a comparison between ipsilateral uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation-a nationwide cohort study.
    Husby KR; Larsen MD; Lose G; Klarskov N
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1441-1449. PubMed ID: 32897459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of perioperative vaginal estrogen as adjunct to native tissue vaginal apical prolapse repair.
    Rahn DD; Richter HE; Sung VW; Pruszynski JE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Aug; 231(2):263.e1-263.e10. PubMed ID: 38710269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association between adjuvant posterior repair and success of native tissue apical suspension.
    Sutkin G; Zyczynski HM; Sridhar A; Jelovsek JE; Rardin CR; Mazloomdoost D; Rahn DD; Nguyen JN; Andy UU; Meyer I; Gantz MG;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):161.e1-161.e8. PubMed ID: 31449806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concomitant Anterior Repair, Preoperative Prolapse Severity, and Anatomic Prolapse Outcomes After Vaginal Apical Procedures.
    Nager CW; Grimes CL; Nolen TL; Wai CY; Brubaker L; Jeppson PC; Wilson TS; Visco AG; Barber MD; Sutkin G; Norton P; Rardin CR; Arya L; Wallace D; Meikle SF;
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29232267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery.
    Shah NM; Berger AA; Zhuang Z; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):306.e1-306.e16. PubMed ID: 35654112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the Treatment of Vaginal Apical Prolapse; the First Randomized Clinical Trial: A pilot study.
    Daneshpajooh A; Pakmanesh H; Sohbati S; Mirzaei M; Zemanati E; Dehesh T
    Urol J; 2022 Jan; 19(2):131-137. PubMed ID: 35094377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fast track sacrospinous ligament fixation: subjective and objective outcomes at 6 months.
    Greisen S; Axelsen SM; Bek KM; Guldberg R; Glavind-Kristensen M
    BMC Womens Health; 2021 Apr; 21(1):154. PubMed ID: 33863314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
    Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.