153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37041013)
1. Evaluation of the accuracy of the PLCO
Jantzen R; Ezer N; Camilleri-Broët S; Tammemägi MC; Broët P
CMAJ Open; 2023; 11(2):E314-E322. PubMed ID: 37041013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. USPSTF2013 versus PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria (International Lung Screening Trial): interim analysis of a prospective cohort study.
Tammemägi MC; Ruparel M; Tremblay A; Myers R; Mayo J; Yee J; Atkar-Khattra S; Yuan R; Cressman S; English J; Bedard E; MacEachern P; Burrowes P; Quaife SL; Marshall H; Yang I; Bowman R; Passmore L; McWilliams A; Brims F; Lim KP; Mo L; Melsom S; Saffar B; Teh M; Sheehan R; Kuok Y; Manser R; Irving L; Steinfort D; McCusker M; Pascoe D; Fogarty P; Stone E; Lam DCL; Ng MY; Vardhanabhuti V; Berg CD; Hung RJ; Janes SM; Fong K; Lam S
Lancet Oncol; 2022 Jan; 23(1):138-148. PubMed ID: 34902336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. OWL: an optimized and independently validated machine learning prediction model for lung cancer screening based on the UK Biobank, PLCO, and NLST populations.
Pan Z; Zhang R; Shen S; Lin Y; Zhang L; Wang X; Ye Q; Wang X; Chen J; Zhao Y; Christiani DC; Li Y; Chen F; Wei Y
EBioMedicine; 2023 Feb; 88():104443. PubMed ID: 36701900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identifying high risk individuals for targeted lung cancer screening: Independent validation of the PLCO
Weber M; Yap S; Goldsbury D; Manners D; Tammemagi M; Marshall H; Brims F; McWilliams A; Fong K; Kang YJ; Caruana M; Banks E; Canfell K
Int J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 141(2):242-253. PubMed ID: 28249359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implications of Nine Risk Prediction Models for Selecting Ever-Smokers for Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening.
Katki HA; Kovalchik SA; Petito LC; Cheung LC; Jacobs E; Jemal A; Berg CD; Chaturvedi AK
Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jul; 169(1):10-19. PubMed ID: 29800127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Addressing Sex Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility: USPSTF vs PLCOm2012 Criteria.
Pasquinelli MM; Tammemägi MC; Kovitz KL; Durham ML; Deliu Z; Guzman A; Rygalski K; Liu L; Koshy M; Finn P; Feldman LE
Chest; 2022 Jan; 161(1):248-256. PubMed ID: 34252436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity of US Preventive Services Task Force and PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria in individuals with lung cancer in South Dakota self-reporting as Indigenous and non-Indigenous.
Tammemägi MC; Cina K; Kitts AKB; Koop D; Petereit MA; Sargent M; Petereit DG
Cancer; 2023 Dec; 129(24):3894-3904. PubMed ID: 37807694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk Model-Based Lung Cancer Screening and Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the US.
Choi E; Ding VY; Luo SJ; Ten Haaf K; Wu JT; Aredo JV; Wilkens LR; Freedman ND; Backhus LM; Leung AN; Meza R; Lui NS; Haiman CA; Park SL; Le Marchand L; Neal JW; Cheng I; Wakelee HA; Tammemägi MC; Han SS
JAMA Oncol; 2023 Dec; 9(12):1640-1648. PubMed ID: 37883107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and Validation of a Multivariable Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model That Includes Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening Results: A Secondary Analysis of Data From the National Lung Screening Trial.
Tammemägi MC; Ten Haaf K; Toumazis I; Kong CY; Han SS; Jeon J; Commins J; Riley T; Meza R
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190204. PubMed ID: 30821827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk Prediction Model Versus United States Preventive Services Task Force Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Criteria: Reducing Race Disparities.
Pasquinelli MM; Tammemägi MC; Kovitz KL; Durham ML; Deliu Z; Rygalski K; Liu L; Koshy M; Finn P; Feldman LE
J Thorac Oncol; 2020 Nov; 15(11):1738-1747. PubMed ID: 32822843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of lung cancer risk model (PLCO
Lebrett MB; Balata H; Evison M; Colligan D; Duerden R; Elton P; Greaves M; Howells J; Irion K; Karunaratne D; Lyons J; Mellor S; Myerscough A; Newton T; Sharman A; Smith E; Taylor B; Taylor S; Walsham A; Whittaker J; Barber PV; Tonge J; Robbins HA; Booton R; Crosbie PAJ
Thorax; 2020 Aug; 75(8):661-668. PubMed ID: 32631933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting the future risk of lung cancer: development, and internal and external validation of the CanPredict (lung) model in 19·67 million people and evaluation of model performance against seven other risk prediction models.
Liao W; Coupland CAC; Burchardt J; Baldwin DR; ; Gleeson FV; Hippisley-Cox J
Lancet Respir Med; 2023 Aug; 11(8):685-697. PubMed ID: 37030308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selection of individuals for lung cancer screening based on risk prediction model performance and economic factors - The Ontario experience.
Tammemägi MC; Darling GE; Schmidt H; Llovet D; Buchanan DN; Leung Y; Miller B; Rabeneck L
Lung Cancer; 2021 Jun; 156():31-40. PubMed ID: 33887677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deep Learning Using Chest Radiographs to Identify High-Risk Smokers for Lung Cancer Screening Computed Tomography: Development and Validation of a Prediction Model.
Lu MT; Raghu VK; Mayrhofer T; Aerts HJWL; Hoffmann U
Ann Intern Med; 2020 Nov; 173(9):704-713. PubMed ID: 32866413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. LDCT lung cancer screening in populations at different risk for lung cancer.
Teles GBDS; Macedo ACS; Chate RC; Valente VAT; Funari MBG; Szarf G
BMJ Open Respir Res; 2020 Feb; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 33371010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Participant selection for lung cancer screening by risk modelling (the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer [PanCan] study): a single-arm, prospective study.
Tammemagi MC; Schmidt H; Martel S; McWilliams A; Goffin JR; Johnston MR; Nicholas G; Tremblay A; Bhatia R; Liu G; Soghrati K; Yasufuku K; Hwang DM; Laberge F; Gingras M; Pasian S; Couture C; Mayo JR; Nasute Fauerbach PV; Atkar-Khattra S; Peacock SJ; Cressman S; Ionescu D; English JC; Finley RJ; Yee J; Puksa S; Stewart L; Tsai S; Haider E; Boylan C; Cutz JC; Manos D; Xu Z; Goss GD; Seely JM; Amjadi K; Sekhon HS; Burrowes P; MacEachern P; Urbanski S; Sin DD; Tan WC; Leighl NB; Shepherd FA; Evans WK; Tsao MS; Lam S;
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Nov; 18(11):1523-1531. PubMed ID: 29055736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Baseline Results of the West London lung cancer screening pilot study - Impact of mobile scanners and dual risk model utilisation.
Bartlett EC; Kemp SV; Ridge CA; Desai SR; Mirsadraee S; Morjaria JB; Shah PL; Popat S; Nicholson AG; Rice AJ; Jordan S; Begum S; Mani A; Derbyshire J; Morris K; Chen M; Peacock C; Addis J; Martins M; Kaye SB; Padley SPG; Devaraj A;
Lung Cancer; 2020 Oct; 148():12-19. PubMed ID: 32771715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selection of eligible participants for screening for lung cancer using primary care data.
O'Dowd EL; Ten Haaf K; Kaur J; Duffy SW; Hamilton W; Hubbard RB; Field JK; Callister ME; Janes SM; de Koning HJ; Rawlinson J; Baldwin DR
Thorax; 2022 Sep; 77(9):882-890. PubMed ID: 34716280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Race & sex disparities related to low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening eligibility criteria: A lung cancer cases review.
Williams RM; Kareff SA; Sackstein P; Roy T; Luta G; Kim C; Taylor KL; Tammemägi MC
Lung Cancer; 2022 Jul; 169():55-60. PubMed ID: 35644087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparative Modeling Analysis of Risk-Based Lung Cancer Screening Strategies.
Ten Haaf K; Bastani M; Cao P; Jeon J; Toumazis I; Han SS; Plevritis SK; Blom EF; Kong CY; Tammemägi MC; Feuer EJ; Meza R; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2020 May; 112(5):466-479. PubMed ID: 31566216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
