These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37041250)
1. University ethics boards are not ready for Indigenous scholars. Grenz J Nature; 2023 Apr; 616(7956):221. PubMed ID: 37041250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Transnational policy migration, interdisciplinary policy transfer and decolonization: Tracing the patterns of research ethics regulation in Taiwan. Zhen-Rong Gan ; Mark Israel Dev World Bioeth; 2020 Mar; 20(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 30993868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How Should Organizations Respond to Repeated Noncompliance by Prominent Researchers? Tsan MF; Tsan GL AMA J Ethics; 2020 Mar; 22(3):E201-208. PubMed ID: 32220266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Researchers break the rules in frustration at review boards. Giles J Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7065):136-7. PubMed ID: 16280994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Court refuses to interfere with institutional review board (IRB). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):8. PubMed ID: 14603945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Hope for the Best, Plan for the Worst": Understanding Institutional Inertia in Developing Confidentiality Protection Policies. Palys T; Ivers A J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Oct; 13(4):438-451. PubMed ID: 30084320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Research approvals iceberg: how a 'low-key' study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better. Petrova M; Barclay S BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 30678668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extend the reach of institutional review boards first, then strengthen their depth. Spike J Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):11-2. PubMed ID: 19061097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Not all research is equal: taking social science research into account. Rasmussen LM Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):17-8. PubMed ID: 19061100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A response to commentators on "Universal and uniform protections of human subjects in research". Shamoo AE; Schwartz J Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):W1. PubMed ID: 19061093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving protection for human research subjects: better oversight, not just more oversight. Schluger NW Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):13-5. PubMed ID: 19061098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific freedom: some face a lonely dilemma. Macy R Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6925):785. PubMed ID: 12594477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Institutional conflicts of interest and research with human subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Feb; 18(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 12814111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Closing loopholes in the federal research regulations: some practical problems. Resnik DB Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):6-8. PubMed ID: 19061095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Protection of ideas and research results]. Musoles S Med Clin (Barc); 2012 Dec; 139(15):688-93. PubMed ID: 23103109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Keeping society from the benchside. Evans JH Am J Bioeth; 2008 Mar; 8(3):14-6; discussion W4-6. PubMed ID: 18570088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Research ethics for clinical researchers. Harnett JD; Neuman R Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():19-30. PubMed ID: 25694302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents. Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Jun; 19(2):64-75. PubMed ID: 31091553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]