99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3704156)
1. Influence of physiologic motion on the appearance of tissue in MR images.
Ehman RL; McNamara MT; Brasch RC; Felmlee JP; Gray JE; Higgins CB
Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):777-82. PubMed ID: 3704156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Respiratory effects in two-dimensional Fourier transform MR imaging.
Axel L; Summers RM; Kressel HY; Charles C
Radiology; 1986 Sep; 160(3):795-801. PubMed ID: 3737920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging with respiratory gating: techniques and advantages.
Ehman RL; McNamara MT; Pallack M; Hricak H; Higgins CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Dec; 143(6):1175-82. PubMed ID: 6333787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Respiratory gating in magnetic resonance imaging at 0.5 Tesla.
Runge VM; Clanton JA; Partain CL; James AE
Radiology; 1984 May; 151(2):521-3. PubMed ID: 6709928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motion artifact reduction with fast spin-echo imaging.
Stark DD; Hendrick RE; Hahn PF; Ferrucci JT
Radiology; 1987 Jul; 164(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 3588902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Overcoming motion in abdominal MR imaging.
Wood ML; Runge VM; Henkelman RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Mar; 150(3):513-22. PubMed ID: 3257601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of motion on two-dimensional Fourier transformation magnetic resonance images.
Schultz CL; Alfidi RJ; Nelson AD; Kopiwoda SY; Clampitt ME
Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 6729101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging of the genitourinary tract.
LiPuma JP; Bryan PJ; Butler HE; Resnick MI
Urol Clin North Am; 1986 Aug; 13(3):531-50. PubMed ID: 3523930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Forty-millisecond MR imaging of the abdomen at 2.0 T.
Saini S; Stark DD; Rzedzian RR; Pykett IL; Rummeny E; Hahn PF; Wittenberg J; Ferrucci JT
Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 2780996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving MR image quality in the presence of motion by using rephasing gradients.
Haacke EM; Lenz GW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Jun; 148(6):1251-8. PubMed ID: 3495155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of respiratory triggering and gating techniques for the removal of respiratory artifacts in MR imaging.
Lewis CE; Prato FS; Drost DJ; Nicholson RL
Radiology; 1986 Sep; 160(3):803-10. PubMed ID: 3737921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Motion suppression in MR imaging of the liver: comparison of respiratory-triggered and nontriggered fast spin-echo sequences.
Low RN; Alzate GD; Shimakawa A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jan; 168(1):225-31. PubMed ID: 8976950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Motion artifact reduction in MR imaging of the abdomen: gradient moment nulling versus respiratory-sorted phase encoding.
Mitchell DG; Vinitski S; Burk DL; Levy DW; Rifkin MD
Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):155-60. PubMed ID: 3420252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Pulse triggering for improved diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the abdomen].
Mürtz P; Pauleit D; Träber F; Gieseke J; Kreft BP; van den Brink JS; Schild HH
Rofo; 2000 Jul; 172(7):587-90. PubMed ID: 10962983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surface coil MR imaging of abdominal viscera. Part I. Theory, technique, and initial results.
Edelman RR; McFarland E; Stark DD; Ferrucci JT; Simeone JF; Wismer G; White EM; Rosen BR; Brady TJ
Radiology; 1985 Nov; 157(2):425-30. PubMed ID: 4048450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Motion artifact control in body MR imaging.
Barish MA; Jara H
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1999 May; 7(2):289-301. PubMed ID: 10382162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging.
Keogan MT; Edelman RR
Radiology; 2001 Aug; 220(2):310-20. PubMed ID: 11477231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intrauterine contraceptive devices: MR imaging.
Mark AS; Hricak H
Radiology; 1987 Feb; 162(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 3797642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FRODO pulse sequences: a new means of eliminating motion, flow, and wraparound artifacts.
Edelman RR; Atkinson DJ; Silver MS; Loaiza FL; Warren WS
Radiology; 1988 Jan; 166(1 Pt 1):231-6. PubMed ID: 3336685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Respiratory ordered phase encoding (ROPE): a method for reducing respiratory motion artefacts in MR imaging.
Bailes DR; Gilderdale DJ; Bydder GM; Collins AG; Firmin DN
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1985; 9(4):835-8. PubMed ID: 4019854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
