These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3704160)

  • 1. Surface shield: device to reduce personnel radiation exposure.
    Young AT; Morin RL; Hunter DW; Nelson KL; Cardella JF; Castaneda-Zuniga WR; Amplatz K
    Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):801-3. PubMed ID: 3704160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction of scatter radiation during transradial percutaneous coronary angiography: a randomized trial using a lead-free radiation shield.
    Politi L; Biondi-Zoccai G; Nocetti L; Costi T; Monopoli D; Rossi R; Sgura F; Modena MG; Sangiorgi GM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jan; 79(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 21520391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Reduction of radiation exposure by protective measures in heart catheter studies and interventional cardiology].
    Prachar H; Dittel M; Kallinger W; Kundtner M; Enenkel W
    Z Kardiol; 1989 Apr; 78(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 2735088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effective use of radiation shields to minimize operator dose during invasive cardiology procedures.
    Fetterly KA; Magnuson DJ; Tannahill GM; Hindal MD; Mathew V
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Oct; 4(10):1133-9. PubMed ID: 22017940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Operator shielding: how and why.
    Schueler BA
    Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Sep; 13(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 20723831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Radiation burden in heart catheter studies--significance of measures for reducing scatter radiation].
    Sievert H; Manegold K; Lie K; Jorda S; Kober G; Kaltenbach M
    Z Kardiol; 1987 Jun; 76(6):326-8. PubMed ID: 3630311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using a sterile disposable protective surgical drape for reduction of radiation exposure to interventionalists.
    King JN; Champlin AM; Kelsey CA; Tripp DA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):153-7. PubMed ID: 11756110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of a sterile, disposable, radiation-absorbing shield reduces occupational exposure to scatter radiation during pectoral device implantation.
    Simons GR; Orrison WW
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jun; 27(6 Pt 1):726-9. PubMed ID: 15189526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Improved radiation protection for medical personnel in angiography and interventional radiology using permanent shielding devices in accordance with section 21 of the Radiography Regulation].
    Eder H
    Radiologe; 1995 Mar; 35(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 7761591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A new radiation protection device for cardiologists active in interventional radiology].
    Utech A; Schulze R; Sievert H
    Z Kardiol; 1994 May; 83(5):336-9. PubMed ID: 8053241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of a suspended radiation protection system versus standard lead apron for radiation exposure of a simulated interventionalist.
    Marichal DA; Anwar T; Kirsch D; Clements J; Carlson L; Savage C; Rees CR
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Apr; 22(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 21354818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduction of operator radiation dose by an extended lower body shield.
    Gonzales JP; Moran C; Silberzweig JE
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Mar; 25(3):462-8, 468.e1. PubMed ID: 24332242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of angiography table shields and height on patient and angiographer irradiation during interventional radiology procedures.
    d'Othée BJ; Lin PJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 17278031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adjustable lead glass shielding device for use with an over-the-table x-ray tube.
    Eubig C; Groves BM; Davey G
    Radiology; 1978 Dec; 129(3):816-8. PubMed ID: 725069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Procedures, spectrum and radiation exposure in CT-fluoroscopy].
    Stoeckelhuber BM; Schulz E; Melchert UH; Blobel J; Gellissen J; Gehl H; Weiss HD; Leibecke T
    Rontgenpraxis; 2003; 55(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 14618963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of a New Lead-Shielding Device and Additional Filter for Reducing Staff and Patient Radiation Exposure During Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study Using a Human Phantom.
    Morishima Y; Chida K; Muroya Y; Utsumi Y
    Dysphagia; 2018 Feb; 33(1):109-114. PubMed ID: 28921404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [How conservative is routine personal dosimetry monitoring in diagnostic radiology?].
    von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
    Rofo; 2007 Jul; 179(7):728-32. PubMed ID: 17657704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The case for radioprotective eyewear/facewear. Practical implications and suggestions.
    Cousin AJ; Lawdahl RB; Chakraborty DP; Koehler RE
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Aug; 22(8):688-92. PubMed ID: 3667176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A flexible shield to protect personnel during interventional procedures.
    Miller DL; Vucich JJ; Cope C
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):825. PubMed ID: 4001386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation risk to the urologist during endourologic procedures, and a new shield that reduces exposure.
    Giblin JG; Rubenstein J; Taylor A; Pahira J
    Urology; 1996 Oct; 48(4):624-7. PubMed ID: 8886071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.