140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37042316)
1. The comparison of efficacy and safety evaluation of vacuum-assisted Elite 10-G system and the traditional BARD 14-G core needle in breast diagnosis: an open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial.
Zhang Y; Li J; Mo M; Shen J; Ren H; Li S; Liu G; Shao Z
Int J Surg; 2023 May; 109(5):1180-1187. PubMed ID: 37042316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the clinical and pathological characteristics of ultrasound-guided biopsy for breast masses and non-mass lesions between 16-gauge spring-loaded core needle biopsy and 12-gauge spring-loaded vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Yashima Y; Fujioka T; Kubota K; Mori M; Sato A; Oda G; Nakagawa T; Onishi I; Tanaka M; Tateishi U
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2023 Apr; 50(2):205-212. PubMed ID: 36645627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast Microcalcifications: Diagnostic Outcomes According to Image-Guided Biopsy Method.
Bae S; Yoon JH; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(5):996-1005. PubMed ID: 26357494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Borderline breast lesions: comparison of malignancy underestimation rates with 14-gauge core needle biopsy versus 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device.
Londero V; Zuiani C; Linda A; Battigelli L; Brondani G; Bazzocchi M
Eur Radiol; 2011 Jun; 21(6):1200-6. PubMed ID: 21225267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benign Papillomas of the Breast Diagnosed on Large-Gauge Vacuum Biopsy compared with 14 Gauge Core Needle Biopsy - Do they require surgical excision?
Seely JM; Verma R; Kielar A; Smyth KR; Hack K; Taljaard M; Gravel D; Ellison E
Breast J; 2017 Mar; 23(2):146-153. PubMed ID: 27797135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized controlled trial of stereotactic 11-G vacuum-assisted core biopsy for the diagnosis and management of mammographic microcalcification.
Bundred SM; Maxwell AJ; Morris J; Lim YY; Harake MJ; Whiteside S; Bundred NJ
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150504. PubMed ID: 26654214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of diagnostic performance of vacuum-assisted biopsy and core needle biopsy for breast microcalcification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Huang XC; Hu XH; Wang XR; Zhou CX; Wang FF; Yang S; Wang GY
Ir J Med Sci; 2018 Nov; 187(4):999-1008. PubMed ID: 29549564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomised pilot study comparing 13 G vacuum-assisted biopsy and conventional 14 G core needle biopsy of axillary lymph nodes in women with breast cancer.
Maxwell AJ; Bundred NJ; Harvey J; Hunt R; Morris J; Lim YY
Clin Radiol; 2016 Jun; 71(6):551-7. PubMed ID: 27040801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast lesions with imaging-histologic discordance during 16-gauge core needle biopsy system: would vacuum-assisted removal get significantly more definitive histologic diagnosis than vacuum-assisted biopsy?
Wang ZL; Liu G; Li JL; Su L; Liu XJ; Wang W; Tang J
Breast J; 2011; 17(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 21762244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differentiating vacuum-assisted breast biopsy from core needle biopsy: Is it necessary?
Nakano S; Imawari Y; Mibu A; Otsuka M; Oinuma T
Br J Radiol; 2018 Dec; 91(1092):20180250. PubMed ID: 29975150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biopsy sampling of breast lesions: comparison of core needle- and vacuum-assisted breast biopsies.
Lacambra MD; Lam CC; Mendoza P; Chan SK; Yu AM; Tsang JY; Tan PH; Tse GM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Apr; 132(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 21698409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of a self-contained vacuum-assisted biopsy system in the assessment of soft tissue tumors.
Simidjiiska-Belyaeva M; Belyaev O; Lehnhardt M; Harati K; Stricker I; Nicolas V; Daigeler A
J Surg Oncol; 2019 Sep; 120(4):740-745. PubMed ID: 31309561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Evolving Role of Vacuum Assisted Biopsy of the Breast: A Progression from Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy.
Bennett IC; Saboo A
World J Surg; 2019 Apr; 43(4):1054-1061. PubMed ID: 30617562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Needle Size in Ultrasound-guided Core Needle Breast Biopsy: Comparison of 14-, 16-, and 18-Gauge Needles.
Giuliani M; Rinaldi P; Rella R; Fabrizi G; Petta F; Carlino G; Di Leone A; Mulè A; Bufi E; Romani M; Belli P; Bonomo L
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Nov; 17(7):536-543. PubMed ID: 28342776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy vs 8- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Suh YJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Kwak JY; Koo HR; Yoon JH
Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):e349-56. PubMed ID: 22422382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the accuracy of US-guided biopsy of breast masses performed with 14-gauge, 16-gauge and 18-gauge automated cutting needle biopsy devices, and review of the literature.
Huang ML; Hess K; Candelaria RP; Eghtedari M; Adrada BE; Sneige N; Fornage BD
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):2928-2933. PubMed ID: 27844099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in accuracy and underestimation rates for 14- versus 16-gauge core needle biopsies in ultrasound-detectable breast lesions.
Lai HW; Wu HK; Kuo SJ; Chen ST; Tseng HS; Tseng LM; Chen DR
Asian J Surg; 2013 Apr; 36(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 23522760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasonography as a Guiding Method in Breast Micro-Calcification Vacuum-Assisted Biopsies.
Keränen AK; Haapea M; Rissanen T
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Oct; 37(5):497-502. PubMed ID: 27737482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast lesions diagnosed by ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy: Can shearwave elastography predict histologic upgrade after surgery or vaccuum assisted excision?
Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Imaging; 2018; 49():150-155. PubMed ID: 29524785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Management of BIRADS 3, 4A, and 4B Lesions Diagnosed as Pure Papilloma by Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy: Is Surgical Excision Necessary?
Raj SD; Phillips J; Mehta TS; Quintana LM; Fishman MD; Dialani V; Slanetz PJ
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):909-914. PubMed ID: 30297308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
