184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37042826)
1. Identifying Men Who Can Remain on Active Surveillance Despite Biopsy Reclassification to Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer.
Baraban E; Erak E; Fatima A; Akbari A; Zhao J; Fletcher SA; Bhanji Y; de la Calle CM; Mamawala M; Landis P; Macura KJ; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2023 Jul; 210(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 37042826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Older Age Predicts Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Grade Reclassification to Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Men on Active Surveillance.
Druskin SC; Mamawala M; Tosoian JJ; Epstein JI; Pavlovich CP; Carter HB; Trock BJ
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 30114397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selecting Patients with Favorable Risk, Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance-Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Have a Role?
Stonier T; Tin AL; Sjoberg DD; Jibara G; Vickers AJ; Fine S; Eastham J
J Urol; 2021 Apr; 205(4):1063-1068. PubMed ID: 33216696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival after Radical Prostatectomy Triggered by Grade Reclassification during Active Surveillance and in Men Newly Diagnosed with Similar Grade Disease.
Diniz CP; Landis P; Carter HB; Epstein JI; Mamawala M
J Urol; 2017 Sep; 198(3):608-613. PubMed ID: 28347771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. African American Race is Not Associated with Risk of Reclassification during Active Surveillance: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study.
Schenk JM; Newcomb LF; Zheng Y; Faino AV; Zhu K; Nyame YA; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Dash A; Filson CP; Gleave ME; Liss M; Martin FM; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Lin DW
J Urol; 2020 Apr; 203(4):727-733. PubMed ID: 31651227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low prostate-specific antigen and no Gleason score upgrade despite more extensive cancer during active surveillance predicts insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Han JS; Toll AD; Amin A; Carter HB; Landis P; Lee S; Epstein JI
Urology; 2012 Oct; 80(4):883-8. PubMed ID: 22921697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of predictors of unfavorable pathological features in men eligible for active surveillance using radical prostatectomy specimens: a multi-institutional study.
Mizuno K; Inoue T; Kinoshita H; Yano T; Kawanishi H; Kanda H; Terada N; Kobayashi T; Kamba T; Mikami Y; Shiraishi T; Uemura Y; Imai Y; Honjo G; Shirase T; Okumura K; Kawakita M; Ogura K; Sugimura Y; Matsuda T; Ogawa O
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2016 Dec; 46(12):1156-1161. PubMed ID: 27744325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Significance of Perineural Invasion in Men With Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
de la Calle CM; Mamawala MM; Landis P; Macura KJ; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Pavlovich CP
J Urol; 2023 Jan; 209(1):180-186. PubMed ID: 36073925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of Initial Gleason Grade on Outcomes during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
Masic S; Cowan JE; Washington SL; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):386-394. PubMed ID: 31158077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subtyping the Risk of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance Based on Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy.
Patel HD; Gupta M; Tosoian JJ; Carter HB; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1068-1074. PubMed ID: 29673946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increasing age predicts adverse pathology including intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and cribriform patterns in deferred radical prostatectomy after upfront active surveillance for Gleason grade group 1 prostate cancer: analysis of prospective observational study cohort.
Tohi Y; Ishikawa R; Kato T; Miyakawa J; Matsumoto R; Mori K; Mitsuzuka K; Inokuchi J; Matsumura M; Shiga K; Naito H; Kohjimoto Y; Kawamura N; Inoue M; Akamatsu S; Terada N; Miyazawa Y; Narita S; Haba R; Sugimoto M
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2023 Oct; 53(10):984-990. PubMed ID: 37496400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
Aghazadeh MA; Frankel J; Belanger M; McLaughlin T; Tortora J; Staff I; Wagner JR
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 29288120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.
Gearman DJ; Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Karnes RJ
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29225057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gleason Grade 1 Prostate Cancer Volume at Biopsy Is Associated With Upgrading but Not Adverse Pathology or Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Results From a Large Institutional Cohort.
Shee K; Washington SL; Cowan JE; de la Calle CM; Baskin AS; Chappidi MR; Escobar D; Nguyen HG; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2023 Jan; 209(1):198-207. PubMed ID: 36067374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Large cribriform glands (> 0.25 mm diameter) as a predictor of adverse pathology in men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer.
Greenland NY; Cowan JE; Stohr BA; Simko JP; Carroll PR; Chan E
Histopathology; 2024 Mar; 84(4):614-623. PubMed ID: 38012532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate Biopsy for Detecting Cribriform Gleason Pattern 4 Carcinoma and Intraductal Carcinoma in Paired Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Ericson KJ; Wu SS; Lundy SD; Thomas LJ; Klein EA; McKenney JK
J Urol; 2020 Feb; 203(2):311-319. PubMed ID: 31483693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biopsy Core Features are Poor Predictors of Adverse Pathology in Men with Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer.
Audenet F; Vertosick EA; Fine SW; Sjoberg DD; Vickers AJ; Reuter VE; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Touijer KA
J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):961-968. PubMed ID: 29030317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adverse Pathologic Findings for Men Electing Immediate Radical Prostatectomy: Defining a Favorable Intermediate-Risk Group.
Patel HD; Tosoian JJ; Carter HB; Epstein JI
JAMA Oncol; 2018 Jan; 4(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 28715578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
