208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37042980)
1. Comparison of prone and upright, stereotactic, and tomosynthesis-guided biopsies with secondary analysis of ultrasound-occult architectural distortions.
Cohen EO; Korhonen KE; Sun J; Leung JWT
Eur Radiol; 2023 Sep; 33(9):6189-6203. PubMed ID: 37042980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Upright Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided versus Prone Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy.
Bahl M; Maunglay M; D'Alessandro HA; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 30511909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Diagnostic Mammography-Guided Biopsy and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Calcifications: Results in 1354 Biopsies.
Nguyen DL; Boron A; Oluyemi ET; Myers KS; Mullen LA; Ambinder EB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):212-223. PubMed ID: 36102725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital Mammography Stereotactic Biopsy versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsy: Differences in Biopsy Targets, Pathologic Results, and Discordance Rates.
Rochat CJ; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):518-527. PubMed ID: 31961261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Without a Sonographic Correlate: A Retrospective Review.
Ambinder EB; Plotkin A; Euhus D; Mullen LA; Oluyemi E; Di Carlo P; Philip M; Panigrahi B; Cimino-Mathews A; Myers KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):845-854. PubMed ID: 33147055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathological outcome of sonographically occult architectural distortions (AD) visible only on digital breast tomosynthesis, and comparison with AD visible also on 2D mammography.
Linda A; Tarricone R; Londero V; Girometti R; Zuiani C
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jan; 146():110075. PubMed ID: 34864616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experiences and comparison with prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Schrading S; Distelmaier M; Dirrichs T; Detering S; Brolund L; Strobel K; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):654-62. PubMed ID: 25386875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Initial Experience of Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsies of Tomosynthesis-Detected (2D Mammography and Ultrasound Occult) Architectural Distortions.
Patel BK; Covington M; Pizzitola VJ; Lorans R; Giurescu M; Eversman W; Lewin J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1395-1400. PubMed ID: 29570367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects on short-term quality of life of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography.
Tagliafico A; Gristina L; Bignotti B; Valdora F; Tosto S; Calabrese M
Br J Radiol; 2015; 88(1056):20150593. PubMed ID: 26463101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of tomosynthesis-guided vacuum assisted breast biopsy of ultrasound occult lesions.
Bohan S; Ramli Hamid MT; Chan WY; Vijayananthan A; Ramli N; Kaur S; Rahmat K
Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):129. PubMed ID: 33420200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prone Versus Upright Digital Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy.
Choudhery S; Johnson M; Fazzio RT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Sep; 215(3):760-764. PubMed ID: 32755154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.
Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital breast Tomosynthesis vacuum assisted biopsy for Tomosynthesis-detected Sonographically occult lesions.
Ariaratnam NS; Little ST; Whitley MA; Ferguson K
Clin Imaging; 2018; 47():4-8. PubMed ID: 28806573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Architectural distortion outcome: digital breast tomosynthesis-detected versus digital mammography-detected.
Ahmed SA; Samy M; Ali AM; Hassan RA
Radiol Med; 2022 Jan; 127(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 34665431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.
Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Guiding vacuum-assisted biopsy in prone position: digital breast tomosynthesis vs stereotactic.
Scaperrotta GP; Boffelli G; Depretto C; Di Leo G; Liguori A; Monaco CG; Borelli A; Ferranti C
Tumori; 2022 Aug; 108(4):326-330. PubMed ID: 34041978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of radiation dose between 2D digital stereotactic versus digital breast tomosynthesis-guided breast biopsies.
Amir T; Zuckerman SP; Barufaldi B; Maidment AD; Conant EF
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Jan; 134():109407. PubMed ID: 33248401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Upright Tomosynthesis-guided Breast Biopsy: Tips, Tricks, and Troubleshooting.
Vijapura CA; Wahab RA; Thakore AG; Mahoney MC
Radiographics; 2021; 41(5):1265-1282. PubMed ID: 34357806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical performance of digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy: a single-institution experience in Japan.
Ido M; Saito M; Banno H; Ito Y; Goto M; Ando T; Kousaka J; Mouri Y; Fujii K; Imai T; Nakano S; Suzuki K; Murotani K
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Jan; 23(1):2. PubMed ID: 36604648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Management of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis With Nonmalignant Pathology at Biopsy.
Villa-Camacho JC; Bahl M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 35107312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
