210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37042980)
21. Long-term outcome of 9G MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results of 293 single-center procedures and underestimation rate of high-risk lesions over 12 years.
Rescinito G; Brunetti N; Garlaschi A; Tosto S; Gristina L; Conti B; Pieroni D; Calabrese M; Tagliafico AS
Radiol Med; 2024 May; 129(5):767-775. PubMed ID: 38512628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Positive Predictive Value of Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsies of Architectural Distortions Seen on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and without an Ultrasound Correlate.
Vijayaraghavan GR; Newburg A; Vedantham S
J Clin Imaging Sci; 2019; 9():53. PubMed ID: 31819830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pathologic Outcomes in Single Versus Multiple Areas of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Wang LC; Philip M; Bhole S; Rao S; Gupta D; Schacht D; Friedewald SM; Anders R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jan; 220(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 35895298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of the systematic introduction of tomosynthesis on breast biopsies: 10 years of results.
La Forgia D; Signorile R; Bove S; Arezzo F; Cormio G; Daniele A; Dellino M; Fanizzi A; Gatta G; Lafranceschina M; Massafra R; Rizzo A; Zito FA; Neri E; Faggioni L
Radiol Med; 2023 Jun; 128(6):704-713. PubMed ID: 37198373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Malignant Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Tomosynthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Choudhery S; Johnson MP; Larson NB; Anderson T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 32966111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: A feasibility study.
Waldherr C; Berclaz G; Altermatt HJ; Cerny P; Keller P; Dietz U; Buser K; Ciriolo M; Sonnenschein MJ
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1582-9. PubMed ID: 26385802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pathologic Upgrade Rates of High-Risk Breast Lesions on Digital Two-Dimensional vs Tomosynthesis Mammography.
Lamb LR; Bahl M; Hughes KS; Lehman CD
J Am Coll Surg; 2018 May; 226(5):858-867. PubMed ID: 29410346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A cohort study of mammography-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in patients with compressed thin breasts (≦ 3 cm).
Yeow YJ; Yu CC; Cheung YC; Chen SC
Asian J Surg; 2023 Oct; 46(10):4296-4301. PubMed ID: 37150735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Architectural distortion in the era of digital breast tomosynthesis: outcomes and implications for management.
Pujara AC; Hui J; Wang LC
Clin Imaging; 2019; 54():133-137. PubMed ID: 30639524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy of MRI-only lesions: a single center experience.
Spick C; Schernthaner M; Pinker K; Kapetas P; Bernathova M; Polanec SH; Bickel H; Wengert GJ; Rudas M; Helbich TH; Baltzer PA
Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):3908-3916. PubMed ID: 26984430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Duration time of vacuum-assisted biopsy for nonpalpable breast masses: comparison between stereotactic and ultrasound-guided procedure.
Szynglarewicz B; Kasprzak P; Kornafel J; Forgacz J; Pudelko M; Majewski A; Matkowski R
Tumori; 2011; 97(4):517-21. PubMed ID: 21989443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Preoperative Tomosynthesis-guided Needle Localization of Mammographically and Sonographically Occult Breast Lesions.
Freer PE; Niell B; Rafferty EA
Radiology; 2015 May; 275(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 25575115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Suspicious Findings at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Occult to Conventional Digital Mammography: Imaging Features and Pathology Findings.
Ray KM; Turner E; Sickles EA; Joe BN
Breast J; 2015; 21(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 26148173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion.
Dibble EH; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Ward RC; Maynard AS; Mainiero MB
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 28710582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pathologic Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Digital 2D Versus Tomosynthesis Mammography.
Bahl M; Lamb LR; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 28834441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Not all false positive diagnoses are equal: On the prognostic implications of false-positive diagnoses made in breast MRI versus in mammography / digital tomosynthesis screening.
Kuhl CK; Keulers A; Strobel K; Schneider H; Gaisa N; Schrading S
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):13. PubMed ID: 29426360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Immediate Migration of Biopsy Clip Markers After Upright Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Core Biopsy.
Teichgraeber DC; Martaindale S; Omofoye TS; Hess KR; Parikh JR; Whitman GJ
Acad Radiol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 31076332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dense Breast Ultrasound Screening After Digital Mammography Versus After Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Dibble EH; Singer TM; Jimoh N; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Dec; 213(6):1397-1402. PubMed ID: 31553658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Tomosynthesis-detected Architectural Distortion: Management Algorithm with Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation.
Durand MA; Wang S; Hooley RJ; Raghu M; Philpotts LE
Radiographics; 2016; 36(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 26963448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Tomosynthesis-Detected Architectural Distortions: Correlations between Imaging Characteristics and Histopathologic Outcomes.
Romanucci G; Fornasa F; Caneva A; Rossati C; Mandarà M; Tommasini O; Rella R
J Imaging; 2023 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 37233322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
