These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37043493)

  • 1. Correcting vaccine misinformation: A failure to replicate familiarity or fear-driven backfire effects.
    Ecker UKH; Sharkey CXM; Swire-Thompson B
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0281140. PubMed ID: 37043493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can corrections spread misinformation to new audiences? Testing for the elusive familiarity backfire effect.
    Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S; Chadwick M
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):41. PubMed ID: 32844338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining the replicability of backfire effects after standalone corrections.
    Prike T; Blackley P; Swire-Thompson B; Ecker UKH
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Jul; 8(1):39. PubMed ID: 37395864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Listening to Misinformation while Driving: Cognitive Load and the Effectiveness of (Repeated) Corrections.
    Sanderson JA; Bowden V; Swire-Thompson B; Lewandowsky S; Ecker UKH
    J Appl Res Mem Cogn; 2023 Sep; 12(3):325-334. PubMed ID: 37829768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parents' beliefs in misinformation about vaccines are strengthened by pro-vaccine campaigns.
    Pluviano S; Watt C; Ragazzini G; Della Sala S
    Cogn Process; 2019 Aug; 20(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 30963330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The backfire effect after correcting misinformation is strongly associated with reliability.
    Swire-Thompson B; Miklaucic N; Wihbey JP; Lazer D; DeGutis J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jul; 151(7):1655-1665. PubMed ID: 35130012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three pro-vaccination strategies.
    Pluviano S; Watt C; Della Sala S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181640. PubMed ID: 28749996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of short-format refutational fact-checks.
    Ecker UKH; O'Reilly Z; Reid JS; Chang EP
    Br J Psychol; 2020 Feb; 111(1):36-54. PubMed ID: 30825195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A systematic review of communication interventions for countering vaccine misinformation.
    Whitehead HS; French CE; Caldwell DM; Letley L; Mounier-Jack S
    Vaccine; 2023 Jan; 41(5):1018-1034. PubMed ID: 36628653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample.
    Ecker UKH; Sze BKN; Andreotta M
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Apr; 376(1822):20200145. PubMed ID: 33612006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forming and updating vaccination beliefs: does the continued effect of misinformation depend on what we think we know?
    Pluviano S; Watt C; Pompéia S; Ekuni R; Della Sala S
    Cogn Process; 2022 Aug; 23(3):367-378. PubMed ID: 35583578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial.
    Yousuf H; van der Linden S; Bredius L; Ted van Essen GA; Sweep G; Preminger Z; van Gorp E; Scherder E; Narula J; Hofstra L
    EClinicalMedicine; 2021 May; 35():100881. PubMed ID: 34124631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the role of memory in misinformation corrections: Repeated exposure, correction durability, and source credibility.
    Kemp PL; Goldman AC; Wahlheim CN
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2024 Apr; 56():101783. PubMed ID: 38171060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing.
    Lewandowsky S; Ecker UK; Seifert CM; Schwarz N; Cook J
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2012 Dec; 13(3):106-31. PubMed ID: 26173286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Searching for the Backfire Effect: Measurement and Design Considerations.
    Swire-Thompson B; DeGutis J; Lazer D
    J Appl Res Mem Cogn; 2020 Sep; 9(3):286-299. PubMed ID: 32905023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Addressing Myths and Vaccine Hesitancy: A Randomized Trial.
    Steffens MS; Dunn AG; Marques MD; Danchin M; Witteman HO; Leask J
    Pediatrics; 2021 Nov; 148(5):. PubMed ID: 34635584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of source expertise and trustworthiness on recollection: the case of vaccine misinformation.
    Pluviano S; Della Sala S; Watt C
    Cogn Process; 2020 Aug; 21(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 32333126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information.
    Swire B; Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1948-1961. PubMed ID: 28504531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why Do People Believe in Vaccine Misinformation? The Roles of Perceived Familiarity and Evidence Type.
    Fang Y
    Health Commun; 2024 Mar; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 38514925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. COVID-19 myth-busting: an experimental study.
    Challenger A; Sumner P; Bott L
    BMC Public Health; 2022 Jan; 22(1):131. PubMed ID: 35045852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.