These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37043867)

  • 1. A GATE Monte Carlo framework for dosimetric evaluation in mammography in an Algerian hospital.
    Bouchikhi BA; Benhalouche S; Ati M; Khelassi Toutaoui N; Arbor N; Bendella SA; Dib ASA; Tebboune A; Belbachir AH; Taleb Ben Diab E
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Jul; 197():110797. PubMed ID: 37043867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.
    Baptista M; Di Maria S; Barros S; Figueira C; Sarmento M; Orvalho L; Vaz P
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3788-800. PubMed ID: 26133581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Normalized glandular dose coefficients for digital breast tomosynthesis systems with a homogeneous breast model.
    Sarno A; Tucciariello RM; Mettivier G; Del Sarto D; Fantacci ME; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065024. PubMed ID: 33535193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glandular dose indices using a glandular dose to air kerma volume histogram in mammography.
    Shinohara S; Araki F; Ohno T
    Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1340-1348. PubMed ID: 31859402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion coefficients for dose estimation in mammography based on a 3D detailed breast model.
    Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Liu H; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2503-2514. PubMed ID: 28295395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of photoelectric cross section data on systematic uncertainties for Monte Carlo breast dosimetry in mammography.
    Massera RT; Fernández-Varea JM; Tomal A
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 May; 66(11):. PubMed ID: 33857930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Homogeneous vs. patient specific breast models for Monte Carlo evaluation of mean glandular dose in mammography.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Di Lillo F; Bliznakova K; Sechopoulos I; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2018 Jul; 51():56-63. PubMed ID: 29705184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating energy deposition in glandular tissues for mammography using multiscale Monte Carlo simulations.
    Oliver PAK; Thomson RM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 30657190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-layer heterogeneous mammographic phantoms for Monte Carlo simulation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.
    Chang TY; Lai KJ; Tu CY; Wu J
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2234. PubMed ID: 32042071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. COMPARISON OF SPECTRA AND MEAN GLANDULAR DOSE WITH TUBE VOLTAGES USED IN DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS FROM SIMULATED, METROLOGICAL AND CLINICAL CASES.
    da Silveira Gatto LB; Braz D; Pacifico L; Travassos P; Magalhaes LAG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Dec; 192(3):402-412. PubMed ID: 33320943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation doses in cone-beam breast computed tomography: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Yi Y; Lai CJ; Han T; Zhong Y; Shen Y; Liu X; Ge S; You Z; Wang T; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):589-97. PubMed ID: 21452696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of Mean Glandular Dose in Mammography System with Different Anode-Filter Combinations Using MCNP Code.
    Gholamkar L; Mowlavi AA; Sadeghi M; Athari M
    Iran J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(4):e36484. PubMed ID: 27895876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients from experimental mammographic x-ray spectra.
    Santos JC; Tomal A; de Barros N; Costa PR
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105010. PubMed ID: 30959490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.
    Sechopoulos I; Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4110-20. PubMed ID: 20879571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Normalized mean glandular dose computation from mammography using GATE: a validation study.
    Myronakis ME; Zvelebil M; Darambara DG
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(7):2247-65. PubMed ID: 23475310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
    Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
    Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical note: MC-GPU breast dosimetry validations with other Monte Carlo codes and phase space file implementation.
    Massera RT; Thomson RM; Tomal A
    Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):244-253. PubMed ID: 34778988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling.
    Shrestha S; Vedantham S; Karellas A
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1969-1993. PubMed ID: 28075335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
    Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
    Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.