These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37046376)

  • 1. Evaluation of Two Spectro-Temporal Ripple Tests and Their Relation to the Matrix Speech-in-Noise Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    van Groesen NRA; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1221-1228. PubMed ID: 37046376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic Current Focusing Compared to Monopolar Stimulation in a Take-Home Trial of Cochlear Implant Users.
    van Groesen NRA; Briaire JJ; de Jong MAM; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):306-317. PubMed ID: 36279119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Site-Selection Strategy Based on Polarity Sensitivity for Cochlear Implants: Effects on Spectro-Temporal Resolution and Speech Perception.
    Goehring T; Archer-Boyd A; Deeks JM; Arenberg JG; Carlyon RP
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Aug; 20(4):431-448. PubMed ID: 31161338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contribution of Verbal Learning & Memory and Spectro-Temporal Discrimination to Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Harris MS; Hamel BL; Wichert K; Kozlowski K; Mleziva S; Ray C; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Moberly AC
    Laryngoscope; 2023 Mar; 133(3):661-669. PubMed ID: 35567421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Free-Field Presentation and Processing Strategy on a Measure of Spectro-Temporal Processing by Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Archer-Boyd AW; Goehring T; Carlyon RP
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520964281. PubMed ID: 33305696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test With the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Lawler M; Yu J; Aronoff JM
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):760-766. PubMed ID: 28957975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An online implementation of a measure of spectro-temporal processing by cochlear-implant listeners.
    Archer-Boyd AW; Harland A; Goehring T; Carlyon RP
    JASA Express Lett; 2023 Jan; 3(1):014402. PubMed ID: 36725534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and validation of a spectro-temporal processing test for cochlear-implant listeners.
    Archer-Boyd AW; Southwell RV; Deeks JM; Turner RE; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):2983. PubMed ID: 30522311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bottom-Up Signal Quality Impacts the Role of Top-Down Cognitive-Linguistic Processing During Speech Recognition by Adults with Cochlear Implants.
    Moberly AC; Lewis JH; Vasil KJ; Ray C; Tamati TN
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Dec; 42(10S):S33-S41. PubMed ID: 34766942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Zheng Y; Escabí M; Litovsky RY
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a clinical assessment of spectral-ripple resolution for cochlear implant users.
    Drennan WR; Anderson ES; Won JH; Rubinstein JT
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e92-8. PubMed ID: 24552679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic Current Focusing: A Novel Approach to Loudness Coding in Cochlear Implants.
    de Jong MAM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 29742542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characteristics and international comparability of the Finnish matrix sentence test in cochlear implant recipients.
    Dietz A; Buschermöhle M; Sivonen V; Willberg T; Aarnisalo AA; Lenarz T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():80-7. PubMed ID: 26364512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive Abilities Contribute to Spectro-Temporal Discrimination in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
    Kirby BJ; Spratford M; Klein KE; McCreery RW
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):645-650. PubMed ID: 30130295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic current focusing for loudness encoding in cochlear implants: a take-home trial.
    de Jong MAM; Briaire JJ; van der Woude SFS; Frijns JHM
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Sep; 58(9):553-564. PubMed ID: 31012768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonlinguistic Outcome Measures in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Over the First Year of Implantation.
    Drennan WR; Won JH; Timme AO; Rubinstein JT
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 26656317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users.
    Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 17587137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining the Relationship Between Speech Recognition and a Spectral-Temporal Test With a Mixed Group of Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implant Users.
    Aronoff JM; Duitsman L; Matusik DK; Hussain S; Lippmann E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Mar; 64(3):1073-1080. PubMed ID: 33719538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.