These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37046376)
21. Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise. Gifford RH; Revit LJ J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):441-51; quiz 487-8. PubMed ID: 20807480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Investigation into the applicability and optimization of the Dutch matrix sentence test for use with cochlear implant users. Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Houben R; Dreschler WA Int J Audiol; 2014 Nov; 53(11):817-28. PubMed ID: 24975235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. High- and Low-Performing Adult Cochlear Implant Users on High-Variability Sentence Recognition: Differences in Auditory Spectral Resolution and Neurocognitive Functioning. Tamati TN; Ray C; Vasil KJ; Pisoni DB; Moberly AC J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):324-335. PubMed ID: 31580802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the Optimized Pitch and Language Strategy in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Vandali A; Dawson P; Au A; Yu Y; Brown M; Goorevich M; Cowan R Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):555-567. PubMed ID: 30067558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of speech recognition in noise with cochlear implants and dynamic FM. Wolfe J; Schafer EC; Heldner B; Mülder H; Ward E; Vincent B J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(7):409-21. PubMed ID: 19928395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Test-Retest Reliability of the Coordinate Response Measure in Adults with Normal Hearing or Cochlear Implants. Saleh SM; Saeed SR; Vickers D Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(2):84-93. PubMed ID: 36812898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Effects of Paired versus Sequential Stimulation on Speech Recognition Outcomes of Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. Holcomb MA; Dornhoffer JR; McRackan TR Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(3):188-194. PubMed ID: 33461201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users. Won JH; Drennan WR; Kang RS; Rubinstein JT Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):796-805. PubMed ID: 20595901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Application of Noise Reduction Algorithm ClearVoice in Cochlear Implant Processing: Effects on Noise Tolerance and Speech Intelligibility in Noise in Relation to Spectral Resolution. Dingemanse JG; Goedegebure A Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):357-67. PubMed ID: 25479412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A multicentre clinical evaluation of paediatric cochlear implant users upgrading to the Nucleus(®) 6 system. Plasmans A; Rushbrooke E; Moran M; Spence C; Theuwis L; Zarowski A; Offeciers E; Atkinson B; McGovern J; Dornan D; Leigh J; Kaicer A; Hollow R; Martelli L; Looi V; Nel E; Del Dot J; Cowan R; Mauger SJ Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 83():193-9. PubMed ID: 26968076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Benefits of Bilateral Hearing on the Telephone for Cochlear Implant Recipients. Miller S; Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Agrawal S; Koch D; Neumann S J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):180-185. PubMed ID: 33873219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The French MBAA2 sentence recognition in noise test for cochlear implant users. James CJ; Laborde ML; Algans C; Tartayre M; Cochard N; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Marx M; Karoui C Int J Audiol; 2023 Apr; 62(4):304-311. PubMed ID: 35290165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Psychoacoustic abilities in pediatric cochlear implant recipients: The relation with short-term memory and working memory capacity. Köse B; Karaman-Demirel A; Çiprut A Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Nov; 162():111307. PubMed ID: 36116181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants. Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Speech understanding in noise with the Roger Pen, Naida CI Q70 processor, and integrated Roger 17 receiver in a multi-talker network. De Ceulaer G; Bestel J; Mülder HE; Goldbeck F; de Varebeke SP; Govaerts PJ Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 May; 273(5):1107-14. PubMed ID: 25983309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessing the Quality of Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing: Implications for Combined Electroacoustic Stimulation With Cochlear Implants. Spitzer ER; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):475-486. PubMed ID: 32976249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants. Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Are Speech Perception Scores in Cochlear Implant Recipients Consistent Across Different Tests? Andresen NS; Vohra V; Galaiya DJ; Carver CL; Marsiglia DD; Yeagle JD; Creighton FX; Wang NY; Bowditch SP; Della Santina CC; Sun DQ Otol Neurotol; 2022 Aug; 43(7):e720-e725. PubMed ID: 35878632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Learning Effects in Psychophysical Tests of Spectral and Temporal Resolution. de Jong MAM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):475-481. PubMed ID: 28953491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users. Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]