150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37046427)
1. A Comparative Evaluation of Mediastinal Nodal SUVmax and Derived Ratios from
AlRasheedi M; Han S; Thygesen H; Neilson M; Hendry F; Alkarn A; Maclay JD; Leung HY
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37046427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Characteristics of Metastatic Mediastinal Lymph Nodes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer on Preoperative F-18 FDG PET/CT.
Lee AY; Choi SJ; Jung KP; Park JS; Lee SM; Bae SK
Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Mar; 48(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 24900137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ratio of Lymph Node to Primary Tumor SUV on PET/CT Accurately Predicts Nodal Malignancy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Mattes MD; Moshchinsky AB; Ahsanuddin S; Rizk NP; Foster A; Wu AJ; Ashamalla H; Weber WA; Rimner A
Clin Lung Cancer; 2015 Nov; 16(6):e253-8. PubMed ID: 26163919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The value on SUV-derived parameters assessed on
Liao X; Liu M; Li S; Huang W; Guo C; Liu J; Xiong Y; Zhang J; Fan Y; Wang R
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Apr; 23(1):49. PubMed ID: 37020286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Node/aorta and node/liver SUV ratios from (18)F-FDG PET/CT may improve the detection of occult mediastinal lymph node metastases in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma.
Kuo WH; Wu YC; Wu CY; Ho KC; Chiu PH; Wang CW; Chang CJ; Yu CT; Yen TC; Lin C
Acad Radiol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):685-92. PubMed ID: 22459646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ratio of Mediastinal Lymph Node SUV to Primary Tumor SUV in
Cho J; Choe JG; Pahk K; Choi S; Kwon HR; Eo JS; Seo HJ; Kim C; Kim S
Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jun; 51(2):140-146. PubMed ID: 28559938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of [
Deleu AL; Laenen A; Decaluwé H; Weynand B; Dooms C; De Wever W; Jentjens S; Goffin K; Vansteenkiste J; Van Laere K; De Leyn P; Nackaerts K; Deroose CM
EJNMMI Res; 2022 May; 12(1):28. PubMed ID: 35524900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Density and SUV ratios from PET/CT in the detection of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer].
Shao T; Yu L; Li Y; Chen M
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 18(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 25800571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of nodal involvement in non-small-cell lung cancer with 18F-FDG-PET/CT: mediastinal blood pool cut-off has the highest sensitivity and tumour SUVmax/2 has the highest specificity.
Mallorie A; Goldring J; Patel A; Lim E; Wagner T
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Aug; 38(8):715-719. PubMed ID: 28658052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving diagnostic performance of
Yang DD; Mirvis E; Goldring J; Patel ARC; Wagner T
Clin Radiol; 2019 Oct; 74(10):818.e17-818.e23. PubMed ID: 31420186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic FDG-PET imaging for differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes of lung cancer.
Wumener X; Zhang Y; Wang Z; Zhang M; Zang Z; Huang B; Liu M; Huang S; Huang Y; Wang P; Liang Y; Sun T
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():1005924. PubMed ID: 36439506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The maximum standardized uptake value of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography of the primary tumour is a good predictor of pathological nodal involvement in clinical N0 non-small-cell lung cancer.
Miyasaka Y; Suzuki K; Takamochi K; Matsunaga T; Oh S
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Jul; 44(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 23233074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic utility of metabolic parameters on FDG PET/CT for lymph node metastasis in patients with cN2 non-small cell lung cancer.
Nakanishi K; Nakamura S; Sugiyama T; Kadomatsu Y; Ueno H; Goto M; Ozeki N; Fukui T; Iwano S; Chen-Yoshikawa TF
BMC Cancer; 2021 Sep; 21(1):983. PubMed ID: 34474680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lymph node staging in non-small-cell lung cancer with FDG-PET scan: a prospective study on 690 lymph node stations from 68 patients.
Vansteenkiste JF; Stroobants SG; De Leyn PR; Dupont PJ; Bogaert J; Maes A; Deneffe GJ; Nackaerts KL; Verschakelen JA; Lerut TE; Mortelmans LA; Demedts MG
J Clin Oncol; 1998 Jun; 16(6):2142-9. PubMed ID: 9626214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The diagnostic ability of
Lee JW; Kim EY; Kim DJ; Lee JH; Kang WJ; Lee JD; Yun M
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4515-4523. PubMed ID: 26943133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual time point imaging for F18-FDG-PET/CT does not improve the accuracy of nodal staging in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Rogasch JM; Steffen IG; Riedel S; Apostolova I; Wertzel H; Achenbach HJ; Steinkrüger FL; Kalinski T; Schultz M; Schreiber J; Amthauer H; Furth C
Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2808-18. PubMed ID: 26560731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. FDG-PET parameters predicting mediastinal malignancy in lung cancer.
Serra Fortuny M; Gallego M; Berna L; Montón C; Vigil L; Masdeu MJ; Fernández-Villar A; Botana MI; Cordovilla R; García-Luján R; Cases E; Monsó E
BMC Pulm Med; 2016 Dec; 16(1):177. PubMed ID: 27931198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A machine learning tool to improve prediction of mediastinal lymph node metastases in non-small cell lung cancer using routinely obtainable [
Rogasch JMM; Michaels L; Baumgärtner GL; Frost N; Rückert JC; Neudecker J; Ochsenreither S; Gerhold M; Schmidt B; Schneider P; Amthauer H; Furth C; Penzkofer T
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Jun; 50(7):2140-2151. PubMed ID: 36820890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of maximum standardized uptake value with occult mediastinal lymph node metastases in cN0 non-small cell lung cancer.
Lin JT; Yang XN; Zhong WZ; Liao RQ; Dong S; Nie Q; Weng SX; Fang XJ; Zheng JY; Wu YL
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Nov; 50(5):914-919. PubMed ID: 27113090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FLT PET/CT imaging in the characterization of mediastinal lymph nodes.
Rayamajhi SJ; Mittal BR; Maturu VN; Agarwal R; Bal A; Dey P; Shukla J; Gupta D
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Apr; 30(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 26661845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
