347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37047928)
21. Psychological Distance Toward Air Pollution and Purchase Intention for New Energy Vehicles: An Investigation in China.
Liu W; Zeng L; Wang Q
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():569115. PubMed ID: 33868068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Research on consumers' purchase intention of cultural and creative products-Metaphor design based on traditional cultural symbols.
Liu L; Zhao H
PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0301678. PubMed ID: 38739577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Contrariwise obesity through organic food consumption in Malaysia: a signaling theory perspective.
Abdullah Z; Putri KYS; Raza SH; Istiyanto SB
BMC Public Health; 2022 Jan; 22(1):99. PubMed ID: 35031029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Explaining consumers' intentions towards purchasing green food in Qingdao, China: The amendment and extension of the theory of planned behavior.
Qi X; Ploeger A
Appetite; 2019 Feb; 133():414-422. PubMed ID: 30537527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is Green Spread? The Spillover Effect of Community Green Interaction on Related Green Purchase Behavior.
Wang J; Yang X; Xi Y; He Z
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 35682156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Unboxing the dilemma associated with online shopping and purchase behavior for remanufactured products: A smart strategy for waste management.
Zhang Y; Hassan NM; Sheikh AA
J Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 351():119790. PubMed ID: 38091731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Recycling habits and environmental responses to fast-fashion consumption: Enhancing the theory of planned behavior to predict Generation Y consumers' purchase decisions.
Cesarina Mason M; Pauluzzo R; Muhammad Umar R
Waste Manag; 2022 Feb; 139():146-157. PubMed ID: 34971902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Would consumers pay for environmental innovation? The moderating role of corporate environmental violations.
Long S; Liao Z
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jun; 28(23):29075-29084. PubMed ID: 33550549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Consumers' consciousness of health-friendly products and services and its association with sociodemographic characteristics and health status: a cross-sectional survey of the South Korean population.
Yun YH; Sim JA; Kim Y; Lee S; Kim KN
BMJ Open; 2020 Jun; 10(6):e035591. PubMed ID: 32565463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Green purchase behavior towards green housing: an investigation of Bangladeshi consumers.
Zahan I; Chuanmin S; Fayyaz M; Hafeez M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Nov; 27(31):38745-38757. PubMed ID: 32632682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Consumers' Decision-Making Process on Social Commerce Platforms: Online Trust, Perceived Risk, and Purchase Intentions.
Lăzăroiu G; Neguriţă O; Grecu I; Grecu G; Mitran PC
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():890. PubMed ID: 32499740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Intention to Purchase Eco-Friendly Handcrafted Fashion Products for Gifting and Personal Use: A Comparison of National and Foreign Consumers.
Saepudin D; Shojaei AS; Barbosa B; Pedrosa I
Behav Sci (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 36829400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Public Awareness of Consumer Products Containing Radioactive Materials: Empirical Evidence from Malaysia.
Sulaiman Z; Ahmad Sugiran HS; Hasbullah NN; Mas'od A; Hashim S; Bradley DA
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35206513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Organic Foods Purchase Behavior among Generation Y of Bangladesh: The Moderation Effect of Trust and Price Consciousness.
Zheng GW; Akter N; Siddik AB; Masukujjaman M
Foods; 2021 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 34681328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Research on the Irrational Behavior of Consumers' Safe Consumption and Its Influencing Factors.
Wang J; Shen M; Gao Z
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Dec; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 30563258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Exploring the mechanism of consumer purchase intention in a traditional culture based on the theory of planned behavior.
Zong Z; Liu X; Gao H
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1110191. PubMed ID: 36860780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Study on the Influencing Factors and Willingness to Pay of Consumers Purchasing Ecological Agricultural Products.
Hao H; Yin S; Yu H; Liu Z; Liu Z
J Environ Public Health; 2022; 2022():8469996. PubMed ID: 36133166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of green marketing mix, green customer value, and attitude on green purchase intention: evidence from the USA.
Ahmed RR; Streimikiene D; Qadir H; Streimikis J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(5):11473-11495. PubMed ID: 36094715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Environmental-friendly Eco-labeling Matters: Evidences From an ERPs Study.
Jin J; Dou X; Meng L; Yu H
Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():417. PubMed ID: 30369874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Modelling the significance of celebrity endorsement and consumer interest on attitude, purchase intention, and willingness to pay a premium price for green skincare products.
Al Mamun A; Naznen F; Yang Q; Ali MH; Hashim NMHN
Heliyon; 2023 Jun; 9(6):e16765. PubMed ID: 37292299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
