These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37050529)

  • 1. A Study on ML-Based Software Defect Detection for Security Traceability in Smart Healthcare Applications.
    Mcmurray S; Sodhro AH
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(7):. PubMed ID: 37050529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Software Defect Prediction for Healthcare Big Data: An Empirical Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques.
    Khan B; Naseem R; Shah MA; Wakil K; Khan A; Uddin MI; Mahmoud M
    J Healthc Eng; 2021; 2021():8899263. PubMed ID: 33815733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast cancer prediction with transcriptome profiling using feature selection and machine learning methods.
    Taghizadeh E; Heydarheydari S; Saberi A; JafarpoorNesheli S; Rezaeijo SM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Oct; 23(1):410. PubMed ID: 36183055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.
    Wu Z; Zhu M; Kang Y; Leung EL; Lei T; Shen C; Jiang D; Wang Z; Cao D; Hou T
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33313673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust biomarker screening from gene expression data by stable machine learning-recursive feature elimination methods.
    Li L; Ching WK; Liu ZP
    Comput Biol Chem; 2022 Oct; 100():107747. PubMed ID: 35932551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Machine Learning Hybrid Model for the Prediction of Chronic Kidney Disease.
    Khalid H; Khan A; Zahid Khan M; Mehmood G; Shuaib Qureshi M
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2023; 2023():9266889. PubMed ID: 36959840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of machine learning approaches for radioisotope identification using NaI(TI) gamma-ray spectrum.
    Qi S; Zhao W; Chen Y; Chen W; Li J; Zhao H; Xiao W; Ai X; Zhang K; Wang S
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2022 Aug; 186():110212. PubMed ID: 35569263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Classification Success Rates of Different Machine Learning Algorithms in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.
    Ozcan I; Aydin H; Cetinkaya A
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Oct; 23(10):3287-3297. PubMed ID: 36308351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine learning-based models for the prediction of breast cancer recurrence risk.
    Zuo D; Yang L; Jin Y; Qi H; Liu Y; Ren L
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Nov; 23(1):276. PubMed ID: 38031071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of a developed triple-classification machine learning model for carcinogenic prediction of hazardous organic chemicals to the US, EU, and WHO based on Chinese database.
    Hao N; Sun P; Zhao W; Li X
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2023 Apr; 255():114806. PubMed ID: 36948010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Traffic Flow-Based Intrusion Detection.
    Rodríguez M; Alesanco Á; Mehavilla L; García J
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(23):. PubMed ID: 36502028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seminal quality prediction using data mining methods.
    Sahoo AJ; Kumar Y
    Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(4):531-45. PubMed ID: 24898862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting Chronic Kidney Disease Using Hybrid Machine Learning Based on Apache Spark.
    Abdel-Fattah MA; Othman NA; Goher N
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():9898831. PubMed ID: 35251161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Which are best for successful aging prediction? Bagging, boosting, or simple machine learning algorithms?
    Mirzaeian R; Nopour R; Asghari Varzaneh Z; Shafiee M; Shanbehzadeh M; Kazemi-Arpanahi H
    Biomed Eng Online; 2023 Aug; 22(1):85. PubMed ID: 37644599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimizing neural networks for medical data sets: A case study on neonatal apnea prediction.
    Shirwaikar RD; Acharya U D; Makkithaya K; M S; Srivastava S; Lewis U LES
    Artif Intell Med; 2019 Jul; 98():59-76. PubMed ID: 31521253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficient Model for Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis: A Comparative Study of Several Machine Learning Algorithms.
    Garavand A; Salehnasab C; Behmanesh A; Aslani N; Zadeh AH; Ghaderzadeh M
    J Healthc Eng; 2022; 2022():5359540. PubMed ID: 36304749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Union With Recursive Feature Elimination: A Feature Selection Framework to Improve the Classification Performance of Multicategory Causes of Death in Colorectal Cancer.
    Deng F; Zhao L; Yu N; Lin Y; Zhang L
    Lab Invest; 2024 Mar; 104(3):100320. PubMed ID: 38158124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical Methods and Social Factors Are Associated With Long-Term Survival in Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma: Construction and Validation of a Prognostic Model Based on Machine Learning Algorithms.
    Mao Y; Huang Y; Xu L; Liang J; Lin W; Huang H; Li L; Wen J; Chen G
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():816427. PubMed ID: 35800057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ZeVigilante: Detecting Zero-Day Malware Using Machine Learning and Sandboxing Analysis Techniques.
    Alhaidari F; Shaib NA; Alsafi M; Alharbi H; Alawami M; Aljindan R; Rahman AU; Zagrouba R
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():1615528. PubMed ID: 35586085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Study of Classification Algorithms for Various DNA Microarray Data.
    Kim J; Yoon Y; Park HJ; Kim YH
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 35328048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.