These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3705127)

  • 1. [Control of film processing and dark room lighting].
    von Volkmann T
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1986; 27():54-66. PubMed ID: 3705127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Assuring image quality in roentgen diagnostic services--information on DIN 6868. Part 2. Film processing: evaluating the uniformity of visual optic density].
    Becker-Gaab C; Borcke E; Bunde E; Hagemann G; Kütterer G; Lang GR; Schöfer H; Stender HS; Stieve FE; von Volkmann T
    Rontgenpraxis; 1987 Feb; 40(2):43-50. PubMed ID: 3576371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maintenance of automatic dental film processors.
    Thunthy KH
    LDA J; 1996; 55(4):12-3. PubMed ID: 9569822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality assurance: 2. The image receptor, the darkroom and processing.
    Horner K
    Dent Update; 1992 Apr; 19(3):120, 122-4, 126. PubMed ID: 1291369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Control of the stability of conditions in photochemical processing of radiographic films. Ministry of Health and Medical Industry of the Russian Federation].
    Chikirdin EG; Zakharova VI
    Med Tekh; 1996; (5):10-2. PubMed ID: 8992176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of the darkroom in radiograph quality control.
    Wolfgang L
    N Y State Dent J; 1998; 64(6):26-9. PubMed ID: 9707980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Analysis of the reasons for the rejection of radiographic films in radiodiagnosis].
    Belletti S; Gallini R; Giugni U
    Radiol Med; 1984; 70(1-2):46-9. PubMed ID: 6484238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Features of the maintenance of automated developing machines].
    Koveshnikov AI
    Med Tekh; 1999; (2):28-33. PubMed ID: 10335507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How good (or bad) is film processing?
    Gray JE
    Radiology; 1992 Oct; 185(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 1523295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The use of a test phantom in step-shaped forms (test steps) for the clarification of different problem situations in x-ray diagnosis. 1. The use of test steps for the estimation of image quality after modified darkroom technics].
    Parisot M
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1990 Mar; 103(3):92-4. PubMed ID: 2317188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Assessment of the quality of radiographic medical films and chemicals for photochemical treatment].
    Larionov VN; Leont'ev VG; Kalashnikova LN
    Med Tekh; 2001; (6):31-4. PubMed ID: 11837193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Study shows inconsistency in film processing quality.
    Pirtle OL
    Radiol Technol; 1993; 64(3):154-9. PubMed ID: 8426900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. X-ray technician error may be wasting film.
    Wagner M
    Mod Healthc; 1992 Jul; 22(30):76. PubMed ID: 10119593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Results of a study on roentgen film processing in automatic film-developing systems].
    Weberling R
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Apr; 38(4):109-12. PubMed ID: 4001773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Film viewing conditions in mammography.
    Giesberg DJ
    Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(5):429-31. PubMed ID: 9170188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [PC-assisted network for quality control in film development].
    Buchberger W; Giacomuzzi SM; Springer P
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(6):341-3. PubMed ID: 9081409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammography (and radiology?) is still plagued with poor quality in photographic processing and darkroom fog.
    Gray JE
    Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):318-9. PubMed ID: 8153299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Good is changing to the best].
    Vlasov PV; Riudiger Iu
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1994; (3):61-2. PubMed ID: 7985374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Introductory remarks of the Editor to the comments on the paper "The visual method for constancy testing of film processing" by H. Eder].
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Sep; 1(5):226-31. PubMed ID: 1751557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The influence of the spectrum and the type of exposure on the contrast of double-sided coated x-ray film].
    Blendl C; Bollen R; Freytag KH
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Nov; 2(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 1457475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.