These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37051543)

  • 21. What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI Instruments Among Patients With Spinal Conditions?
    Hung M; Saltzman CL; Kendall R; Bounsanga J; Voss MW; Lawrence B; Spiker R; Brodke D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 476(10):2027-2036. PubMed ID: 30179950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test Version 2.0 in a Nonshoulder Hand and Upper Extremity Population.
    Kazmers NH; Qiu Y; Yoo M; Stephens AR; Zeidan M; Zhang Y
    J Hand Surg Am; 2021 Oct; 46(10):927.e1-927.e10. PubMed ID: 33812773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development and validation of the system of quality of life instruments for cancer patients: breast cancer (QLICP-BR).
    Wan C; Yang Z; Tang X; Zou T; Chen D; Zhang D; Meng Q
    Support Care Cancer; 2009 Apr; 17(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 18626667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
    Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How is the minimal clinically important difference established in health-related quality of life instruments? Review of anchors and methods.
    Mouelhi Y; Jouve E; Castelli C; Gentile S
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 May; 18(1):136. PubMed ID: 32398083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Usefulness of minimum clinically important difference for assessing patients with subaxial degenerative cervical spine disease: statistical versus substantial clinical benefit.
    Auffinger B; Lam S; Shen J; Thaci B; Roitberg BZ
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2013 Dec; 155(12):2345-54; discussion 2355. PubMed ID: 24136679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An international prospective study establishing minimal clinically important differences in the EORTC QLQ-BM22 and QLQ-C30 in cancer patients with bone metastases.
    Zeng L; Chow E; Zhang L; Tseng LM; Hou MF; Fairchild A; Vassiliou V; Jesus-Garcia R; Alm El-Din MA; Kumar A; Forges F; Chie WC; Bedard G; Bottomley A
    Support Care Cancer; 2012 Dec; 20(12):3307-13. PubMed ID: 22562607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patient self-appraisal of change and minimal clinically important difference on the European organization for the research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 before and during cancer therapy.
    Hong F; Bosco JL; Bush N; Berry DL
    BMC Cancer; 2013 Mar; 13():165. PubMed ID: 23537330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measuring surgical outcomes in subaxial degenerative cervical spine disease patients: minimum clinically important difference as a tool for determining meaningful clinical improvement.
    Auffinger B; Lam S; Shen J; Roitberg BZ
    Neurosurgery; 2014 Feb; 74(2):206-13; discussion 213-4. PubMed ID: 24220005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?
    Clement ND; Bardgett M; Weir D; Holland J; Gerrand C; Deehan DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 476(10):2005-2014. PubMed ID: 30179956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Minimal Clinically Important Differences for American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score in Hallux Valgus Surgery.
    Chan HY; Chen JY; Zainul-Abidin S; Ying H; Koo K; Rikhraj IS
    Foot Ankle Int; 2017 May; 38(5):551-557. PubMed ID: 28193121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Wisconsin gait scale - The minimal clinically important difference.
    Guzik A; Drużbicki M; Wolan-Nieroda A; Przysada G; Kwolek A
    Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():453-457. PubMed ID: 30599331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Minimal clinically important difference for the Mandarin version of the Tinnitus Questionnaire determined via anchor-based and distribution-based methods.
    Gu H; Diao C; Tang J; Yang B; Ji J; Zhou M; Meng Z
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2022 Nov; 20(1):157. PubMed ID: 36451205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Establishing minimum clinically important difference for patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; MacGregor KR; Oyetayo OO; Zheng E; Singh K
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Feb; 165(2):325-334. PubMed ID: 36602614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Development of the system of quality of life instruments for patients with breast cancer (QLICP-BR)].
    Yang Z; Tang XL; Wan CH; Zou TN; Chen DD; Zhang DM; Meng Q
    Ai Zheng; 2007 Oct; 26(10):1122-6. PubMed ID: 17927885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Establishing minimal clinically important difference for the UCLA and ASES scores after rotator cuff repair.
    Malavolta EA; Yamamoto GJ; Bussius DT; Assunção JH; Andrade-Silva FB; Gracitelli MEC; Ferreira Neto AA
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Apr; 108(2):102894. PubMed ID: 33746073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimal clinically meaningful differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 scales in brain cancer patients.
    Maringwa J; Quinten C; King M; Ringash J; Osoba D; Coens C; Martinelli F; Reeve BB; Gotay C; Greimel E; Flechtner H; Cleeland CS; Schmucker-Von Koch J; Weis J; Van Den Bent MJ; Stupp R; Taphoorn MJ; Bottomley A;
    Ann Oncol; 2011 Sep; 22(9):2107-2112. PubMed ID: 21324954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Patients With Vestibular Schwannoma: Are all Quality-of-Life Scores Significant?
    Kerezoudis P; Yost KJ; Tombers NM; Celda MP; Carlson ML; Link MJ
    Neurosurgery; 2019 Dec; 85(6):779-785. PubMed ID: 30395303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.