BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37052059)

  • 21. Comparison of esCCO and transthoracic echocardiography for non-invasive measurement of cardiac output intensive care.
    Bataille B; Bertuit M; Mora M; Mazerolles M; Cocquet P; Masson B; Moussot PE; Ginot J; Silva S; Larché J
    Br J Anaesth; 2012 Dec; 109(6):879-86. PubMed ID: 22907340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lack of agreement between pulmonary arterial thermodilution cardiac output and the pressure recording analytical method in postoperative cardiac surgery patients.
    Paarmann H; Groesdonk HV; Sedemund-Adib B; Hanke T; Heinze H; Heringlake M; Schön J
    Br J Anaesth; 2011 Apr; 106(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 21205624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cardiac index assessment by the pressure recording analytic method in unstable patients with atrial fibrillation.
    Maj G; Monaco F; Landoni G; Barile L; Nicolotti D; Pieri M; Melisurgo G; Pappalardo F; Zangrillo A
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Jun; 25(3):476-80. PubMed ID: 21147000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of cardiac output in children: a comparison between the pressure recording analytical method and Doppler echocardiography.
    Calamandrei M; Mirabile L; Muschetta S; Gensini GF; De Simone L; Romano SM
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2008 May; 9(3):310-2. PubMed ID: 18446106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cardiac index assessment by the pressure recording analytic method in critically ill unstable patients after cardiac surgery.
    Barile L; Landoni G; Pieri M; Ruggeri L; Maj G; Nigro Neto C; Pasin L; Cabrini L; Zangrillo A
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1108-13. PubMed ID: 23992652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reliability of three-dimensional color flow Doppler and two-dimensional pulse wave Doppler transthoracic echocardiography for estimating cardiac output after cardiac surgery.
    Hao GW; Liu Y; Ma GG; Hou JY; Zhu DM; Liu L; Zhang Y; Liu H; Zhuang YM; Luo Z; Tu GW; Yang XM; Chen HY
    Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2019 Apr; 17(1):5. PubMed ID: 30944001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Authentication of Radial Versus Femoral Arterial Pressure Waveform-Derived Cardiac Output With Transesophageal Echocardiography-Derived Cardiac Output Measurements in Patients Undergoing On-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery.
    Maddali MM; Waje ND; Sathiya PM
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2017 Aug; 31(4):1183-1189. PubMed ID: 28465122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantification of left ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac output using a novel semi-automated echocardiographic method: a prospective observational study in coronary artery bypass patients.
    Komanek T; Rabis M; Omer S; Peters J; Frey UH
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2023 Feb; 23(1):65. PubMed ID: 36855077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states.
    Scolletta S; Romano SM; Biagioli B; Capannini G; Giomarelli P
    Br J Anaesth; 2005 Aug; 95(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 15894561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The accuracy of electrical cardiometry for the noninvasive determination of cardiac output before and after lung surgeries compared to transthoracic echocardiography.
    Elgebaly AS; Anwar AG; Fathy SM; Sallam A; Elbarbary Y
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2020; 23(3):288-292. PubMed ID: 32687084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. CARDIAC OUTPUT IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS CAN BE ESTIMATED EASILY AND ACCURATELY USING THE MINUTE DISTANCE OBTAINED BY PULSED-WAVE DOPPLER.
    Villavicencio C; Daniel X; Cartanyá M; Leache J; Ferré C; Roure M; Bodí M; Vives M; Rodriguez A
    Shock; 2023 Oct; 60(4):553-559. PubMed ID: 37698504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measuring cardiac output in children undergoing cardiac catheterization: comparison between the Fick method and PRAM (pressure recording analytical method).
    Alonso-Iñigo JM; Escribá FJ; Carrasco JI; Fas MJ; Argente P; Galvis JM; Llopis JE
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 Nov; 26(11):1097-1105. PubMed ID: 27565740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cardiac output estimation using multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform: a method comparison study in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery using intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution as the reference method.
    Saugel B; Heeschen J; Hapfelmeier A; Romagnoli S; Greiwe G
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Aug; 34(4):649-654. PubMed ID: 31456072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy, Precision, and Trending Ability of Uncalibrated Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis of Cardiac Output in Patients With Impaired Left Ventricular Function: A Prospective, Observational Study.
    Montenij LJ; Sonneveld JP; Nierich AP; Buhre WF; De Waal EE
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2016 Jan; 30(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 26520028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of the ability of two continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output: estimated continuous cardiac output measured by modified pulse wave transit time and an arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.
    Terada T; Oiwa A; Maemura Y; Robert S; Kessoku S; Ochiai R
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 26370094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison between pressure-recording analytical method (PRAM) and femoral arterial thermodilution method (FATD) cardiac output monitoring in an infant animal model of cardiac arrest.
    Urbano J; López J; González R; Fernández SN; Solana MJ; Toledo B; Carrillo Á; López-Herce J
    Intensive Care Med Exp; 2016 Dec; 4(1):13. PubMed ID: 27256288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of cardiac function in infants with transposition of the great arteries after surgery: comparison of two methods.
    Yang F; Iacobelli R; Wang JM; Iorio FS
    World J Pediatr; 2018 Aug; 14(4):373-377. PubMed ID: 30062649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Calibrated versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis in monitoring cardiac output with transpulmonary thermodilution in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: an observational study.
    Slagt C; Helmi M; Malagon I; Groeneveld AB
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jan; 32(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 25387298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radial Artery Tonometry to Monitor Blood Pressure and Hemodynamics in Ambulatory Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients in Comparison With Doppler Ultrasound and Transthoracic Echocardiography: A Pilot Study.
    Zayat R; Drosos V; Schnoering H; Lee JY; Bleilevens C; Musetti G; Jansen-Park SH; Kang H; Menon AK; Schmitz-Rode T; Autschbach R; Hatam N; Moza A
    Artif Organs; 2019 Mar; 43(3):242-253. PubMed ID: 30040134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Monitoring haemodynamic response to fluid-challenge in ICU: comparison of pressure recording analytical method and oesophageal Doppler: A prospective observational study.
    Barthélémy R; Neuschwander A; Dramé F; Redouté M; Ditchi D; Stern J; Mebazaa A; Pirracchio R; Chousterman BG
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2019 Feb; 36(2):135-143. PubMed ID: 30624291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.