These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37052646)

  • 21. [Do we need to perform systematic supracervical hysterectomy during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy?].
    Saliba E; Nisolle M; Tchente C; De Landsheere L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019; 47(7-8):549-554. PubMed ID: 31003018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prolapse and mesh reoperations following sacrocolpopexy: comparing supracervical hysterectomy, total hysterectomy, and no hysterectomy.
    Kikuchi JY; Yanek LR; Handa VL; Chen CCG; Jacobs S; Blomquist J; Patterson D
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):135-145. PubMed ID: 35689689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Risk of postoperative mesh exposure following sacrocolpopexy with supracervical versus total concomitant laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Glass Clark S; Bretschneider CE; Bradley MS; Rhodes S; Shoag J; Sheyn D
    Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Jan; 35(1):207-213. PubMed ID: 38060029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing the Impact of Vaginal Hysterectomy with Vaginal Mesh Attachment on Outcomes and Complications during Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Woodburn KL; Bradley SE; Ward SA; Schirm KA; Clarke B; Gutman RE; Sokol AI
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 30(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 36223863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.
    Chan JCY; Yu CH; Go WW
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):271-278. PubMed ID: 36394632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Outcomes of sacrocolpopexy/sacrohysteropexy with mesh placement targeted to affected compartment.
    Rusavy Z; Najib B; Abdelkhalek Y; Grinstein E; Gluck O; Deval B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 May; 272():188-192. PubMed ID: 35364554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Advanced Cystocele is a Risk Factor for Surgical Failure after Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.
    Padoa A; Shiber Y; Fligelman T; Tomashev R; Tsviban A; Smorgick N
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):409-415. PubMed ID: 34763064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hysterectomy Versus Uterine Preservation at the Time of Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery.
    Wang R; Tunitsky-Bitton E; Ramaseshan AS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Apr; 44(4):359-364. PubMed ID: 34742945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Complications and objective outcomes of uterine preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse versus procedures removing the Uterus, a systematic review.
    Azadi A; Marchand G; Masoud AT; Sainz K; Govindan M; Ware K; King A; Ruther S; Brazil G; Calteux N; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Ostergard DR
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Dec; 267():90-98. PubMed ID: 34736035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacral colpopexy plus supracervical hysterectomy in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
    Campagna G; Vacca L; Panico G; Rumolo V; Caramazza D; Lombisani A; Rossitto C; Gadonneix P; Scambia G; Ercoli A
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):359-368. PubMed ID: 34132865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a cohort study (POP-UP study).
    Gagyor D; Kalis V; Smazinka M; Rusavy Z; Pilka R; Ismail KM
    BMC Womens Health; 2021 Feb; 21(1):72. PubMed ID: 33596878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Complications and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Sato H; Abe H; Ikeda A; Miyagawa T; Sato K
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Jan; 41(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 32148120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: A comprehensive literature review on current practice.
    Gluck O; Blaganje M; Veit-Rubin N; Phillips C; Deprest J; O'reilly B; But I; Moore R; Jeffery S; Haddad JM; Deval B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Feb; 245():94-101. PubMed ID: 31891897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Outcomes of a Staged Midurethral Sling Strategy for Stress Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Giugale LE; Carter-Brooks CM; Ross JH; Shepherd JP; Zyczynski HM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 134(4):736-744. PubMed ID: 31503149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Obesity and its long-term impact on sacrocolpopexy key outcomes (OBELISK).
    Smazinka M; Kalis V; Havir M; Havelkova L; Ismail KM; Rusavy Z
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Aug; 31(8):1655-1662. PubMed ID: 31396638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Laparoscopic posterior colporrhaphy using a unidirectional barbed suture for risk hedging laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Ichikawa M; Akira S; Takeshita T
    Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2017; 6(2):96-97. PubMed ID: 30254888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative mid-term anatomical and functional outcomes following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in women under and over 65: results from a prospective study.
    Vidal F; Léonard F; André B; Guerby P; Jourdain O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 297(6):1465-1472. PubMed ID: 29546565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lifetime risk of surgery for stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse.
    Wilkins MF; Wu JM
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Apr; 69(2):171-177. PubMed ID: 28001022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical outcomes in women undergoing laparoscopic hysteropexy: A systematic review.
    Nair R; Nikolopoulos KI; Claydon LS
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jan; 208():71-80. PubMed ID: 27894032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.