299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37052929)
1. Effectiveness of an Over-the-Counter Self-fitting Hearing Aid Compared With an Audiologist-Fitted Hearing Aid: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
De Sousa KC; Manchaiah V; Moore DR; Graham MA; Swanepoel W
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Jun; 149(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 37052929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Effects of Service-Delivery Model and Purchase Price on Hearing-Aid Outcomes in Older Adults: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
Humes LE; Rogers SE; Quigley TM; Main AK; Kinney DL; Herring C
Am J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 26(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 28252160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Remote or in-clinic? The effect of service delivery mode on hearing aid output: study protocol for a double-blinded, randomised trial in adults with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
Lett C; Welch D; Dobson R
Trials; 2024 Apr; 25(1):256. PubMed ID: 38610038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.
Sabin AT; Van Tasell DJ; Rabinowitz B; Dhar S
Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216519900589. PubMed ID: 32003285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Follow-Up Clinical Trial Evaluating the Consumer-Decides Service Delivery Model.
Humes LE; Kinney DL; Main AK; Rogers SE
Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):69-84. PubMed ID: 30938563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effects of Extended Input Dynamic Range on Laboratory and Field-Trial Evaluations in Adult Hearing Aid Users.
Plyler PN; Easterday M; Behrens T
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):634-648. PubMed ID: 30403956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low-Level Speech Recognition of Children with Hearing Aids.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Miller S; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Dunn A; Battles J; Neumann S; Manning J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Apr; 33(4):196-205. PubMed ID: 34758503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit.
Abrams HB; Chisolm TH; McManus M; McArdle R
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):768-78. PubMed ID: 23169194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Physician Consultation on Satisfaction With Hearing Aid Use: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Zhao K; Hambley M; Venema T; Marynewich S; McNeely B; Nunez DA
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Jul; 148(7):630-635. PubMed ID: 35588353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implantable Devices for Single-Sided Deafness and Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss: A Health Technology Assessment.
Ontario Health (Quality)
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2020; 20(1):1-165. PubMed ID: 32194878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearing aid fitting outcome: clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA).
Brännström KJ; Wennerström I
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):512-21. PubMed ID: 21034698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.
Barker F; Mackenzie E; Elliott L; Jones S; de Lusignan S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 2016(8):CD010342. PubMed ID: 27537242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mild-Gain Hearing Aids as a Treatment for Adults with Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties.
Roup CM; Post E; Lewis J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):477-494. PubMed ID: 29863462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.
Barker F; Mackenzie E; Elliott L; Jones S; de Lusignan S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; (7):CD010342. PubMed ID: 25019297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the benefit provided by well-fit linear hearing aids and instruments with automatic reductions of low-frequency gain.
Humes LE; Christensen LA; Bess FH; Hedley-Williams A
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 40(3):666-85. PubMed ID: 9210122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Expectations, prefitting counseling, and hearing aid outcome.
Saunders GH; Lewis MS; Forsline A
J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 May; 20(5):320-34. PubMed ID: 19585963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics of hearing aid fittings in infants and young children.
McCreery RW; Bentler RA; Roush PA
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):701-10. PubMed ID: 23575463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of Hearing Aid Use by Individuals with Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss (USNHL).
Bishop CE; Hamadain E; Galster JA; Johnson MF; Spankovich C; Windmill I
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):941-949. PubMed ID: 29130442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
Reber MB; Kompis M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
