BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37053424)

  • 1. Cognate translation priming with Chinese-Japanese bilinguals: No effect of interlingual phonological similarity.
    Liu C; Wanner-Kawahara J; Yoshihara M; Lupker SJ; Nakayama M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Nov; 49(11):1823-1843. PubMed ID: 37053424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual word recognition of Chinese-Japanese bilinguals: limited role of phonology.
    Jiao Z; Du L; Wang Y; Li Y
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1318798. PubMed ID: 38239469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Masked Translation Priming Effects for Chinese-English-Japanese Triple Cognates in Lexical Decision Tasks.
    Li L; Yang H; Jia G; Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2024 Jun; 53(4):51. PubMed ID: 38913110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Translation priming with different scripts: masked priming with cognates and noncognates in Hebrew-English bilinguals.
    Gollan TH; Forster KI; Frost R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Sep; 23(5):1122-39. PubMed ID: 9293625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-script phonological activation in Chinese-English bilinguals: The effect of SOA from masked priming.
    Xu G; Lin J; Dong Y
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Dec; 75(4):374-386. PubMed ID: 34096746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognate status and cross-script translation priming.
    Voga M; Grainger J
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):938-52. PubMed ID: 17910178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is there phonologically based priming in the same-different task? Evidence from Japanese-English bilinguals.
    Lupker SJ; Nakayama M; Perea M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1281-99. PubMed ID: 26076173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Masked Translation Priming With Concreteness of Cross-Script Cognates in Visual Word Recognition by Chinese Learners of English: An ERP Study.
    Chen S; Fu T; Zhao M; Zhang Y; Peng Y; Yang L; Gu X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():796700. PubMed ID: 35069388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic phonological access among bilinguals with cross-script languages.
    Zhang N; Ren J; Wang M; Jiang N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jul; 77(7):1399-1417. PubMed ID: 37608459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards a distributed connectionist account of cognates and interlingual homographs: evidence from semantic relatedness tasks.
    Poort ED; Rodd JM
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e6725. PubMed ID: 31143528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is there lexical competition in the recognition of L2 words for different-script bilinguals? An examination using masked priming with Japanese-English bilinguals.
    Nakayama M; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1168-1185. PubMed ID: 29683717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-language phonological activation: evidence from masked onset priming and ERPs.
    Jouravlev O; Lupker SJ; Jared D
    Brain Lang; 2014 Jul; 134():11-22. PubMed ID: 24814580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phonologically-based priming in the same-different task with L1 readers.
    Lupker SJ; Nakayama M; Yoshihara M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1317-1324. PubMed ID: 29389191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The activation of phonological representations by bilinguals while reading silently: evidence from interlingual homophones.
    Haigh CA; Jared D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):623-44. PubMed ID: 17576144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognates facilitate switches and then confusion: Contrasting effects of cascade versus feedback on language selection.
    Li C; Gollan TH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jun; 44(6):974-991. PubMed ID: 29283605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-linguistic similarity and task demands in Japanese-English bilingual processing.
    Allen DB; Conklin K
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e72631. PubMed ID: 24015266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological correlates of masked orthographic and phonological priming in Chinese-English bilinguals.
    Zhang EH; Li J; Zhang XD; Li D; Cao HW
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):16648. PubMed ID: 36198859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phonological priming effects with same-script primes and targets in the masked priming same-different task.
    Yang H; Yoshihara M; Nakayama M; Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jan; 49(1):148-162. PubMed ID: 32839892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting the influence of phonological similarity on cognate processing: Evidence from Cantonese-Japanese bilinguals.
    Wong BWL; Hemelstrand S; Inoue T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Apr; ():17470218241242631. PubMed ID: 38490817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The cognate facilitation effect in bilingual lexical decision is influenced by stimulus list composition.
    Poort ED; Rodd JM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():52-63. PubMed ID: 28869840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.