These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37055304)
41. Effects of solvent type and UV post-cure time on 3D-printed restorative polymers. Finck NS; Fraga MAA; Correr AB; Dalmaschio CJ; Rodrigues CS; Moraes RR Dent Mater; 2024 Mar; 40(3):451-457. PubMed ID: 38129193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of the color stability and surface roughness of 3-unit provisional fixed partial dentures fabricated by milling, conventional and different 3D printing fabrication techniques. Ellakany P; Fouda SM; AlGhamdi MA; Aly NM J Dent; 2023 Apr; 131():104458. PubMed ID: 36806621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Monomer release from surgical guide resins manufactured with different 3D printing devices. Kessler A; Reichl FX; Folwaczny M; Högg C Dent Mater; 2020 Nov; 36(11):1486-1492. PubMed ID: 32972769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. An Interdisciplinary Study Regarding the Characteristics of Dental Resins Used for Temporary Bridges. Mârțu I; Murariu A; Baciu ER; Savin CN; Foia I; Tatarciuc M; Diaconu-Popa D Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Jun; 58(6):. PubMed ID: 35744074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Translucency parameter and color masking ability of CAD-CAM denture base materials against metal substrates. Wang YJ; Chu TG; Lin WS J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(S1):61-67. PubMed ID: 35929188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Cytotoxicity and inflammatory response of different types of provisional restorative materials. Campaner M; Takamiya AS; Bitencourt SB; Mazza LC; de Oliveira SHP; Shibayama R; Barão VAR; Sukotjo C; Pesqueira AA Arch Oral Biol; 2020 Mar; 111():104643. PubMed ID: 31918345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Surface roughness and shear bond strength to composite resin of additively manufactured interim restorative material with different printing orientations. Nasiry Khanlar L; Revilla-León M; Barmak AB; Ikeda M; Alsandi Q; Tagami J; Zandinejad A J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):788-795. PubMed ID: 34602276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Cytotoxicity of temporary cements on bovine dental pulp-derived cells (bDPCs) using realtime cell analysis. Malkoç MA; Demİr N; Şengün A; Bozkurt ŞB; Hakki SS J Adv Prosthodont; 2015 Feb; 7(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 25722833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Influence of the material for preformed moulds on the polymerization temperature of resin materials for temporary FPDs. Pott PC; Schmitz-Wätjen H; Stiesch M; Eisenburger M J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 9(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 28874997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Biological Effects of PMMA and Composite Resins on Human Gingival Fibroblasts: An In Vitro Comparative Study. Della Rocca Y; Traini EM; Trubiani O; Traini T; Mazzone A; Marconi GD; Pizzicannella J; Diomede F Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Apr; 25(9):. PubMed ID: 38732100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Flexural Strength of 3D-Printing Resin Materials for Provisional Fixed Dental Prostheses. Park SM; Park JM; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY Materials (Basel); 2020 Sep; 13(18):. PubMed ID: 32911702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Effects of the Washing Time and Washing Solution on the Biocompatibility and Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Dental Resin Materials. Hwangbo NK; Nam NE; Choi JH; Kim JE Polymers (Basel); 2021 Dec; 13(24):. PubMed ID: 34960960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The impact of provisional intraradicular retainers cementation with temporary methacrylate-based resin in the bond strength of glass fiber posts to root dentin. Rosa E Silva VL; Silva FASD; Alves Dos Santos GN; Assis HC; Souza-Gabriel AE; Silva-Sousa YTC; Lopes-Olhê FC; Sousa-Neto MD; Mazzi-Chaves JF J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Nov; 135():105486. PubMed ID: 36182677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Fracture load of CAD/CAM-fabricated and 3D-printed composite crowns as a function of material thickness. Zimmermann M; Ender A; Egli G; Özcan M; Mehl A Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jun; 23(6):2777-2784. PubMed ID: 30368664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Cytotoxicity of root perforation repair materials. Makkawy HA; Koka S; Lavin MT; Ewoldsen NO J Endod; 1998 Jul; 24(7):477-9. PubMed ID: 9693574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Evaluation of wear behaviour of various occlusal splint materials and manufacturing processes. Grymak A; Waddell JN; Aarts JM; Ma S; Choi JJE J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():105053. PubMed ID: 34998068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic stainless-steel brackets on temporary crowns fabricated by three different methods: An in vitro study. Fotovat F; Shishehian A; Alijani S; Alafchi B; Parchami P Int Orthod; 2022 Jun; 20(2):100641. PubMed ID: 35624022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Biomechanical properties of a 3D printing polymer for provisional restorations and artificial teeth. Britto VT; Cantelli V; Collares FM; Bertol CD; Della Bona Á Dent Mater; 2022 Dec; 38(12):1956-1962. PubMed ID: 36424204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed, CAD/CAM, and Conventional Denture Base Materials. Prpić V; Schauperl Z; Ćatić A; Dulčić N; Čimić S J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):524-528. PubMed ID: 32270904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]