294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37055741)
1. Cervical cancer survival prediction by machine learning algorithms: a systematic review.
Rahimi M; Akbari A; Asadi F; Emami H
BMC Cancer; 2023 Apr; 23(1):341. PubMed ID: 37055741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes.
Woldaregay AZ; Årsand E; Walderhaug S; Albers D; Mamykina L; Botsis T; Hartvigsen G
Artif Intell Med; 2019 Jul; 98():109-134. PubMed ID: 31383477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of machine learning to predict bladder cancer survival outcomes: a systematic literature review.
Liu YS; Thaliffdeen R; Han S; Park C
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2023; 23(7):761-771. PubMed ID: 37306511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction models applying machine learning to oral cavity cancer outcomes: A systematic review.
Adeoye J; Tan JY; Choi SW; Thomson P
Int J Med Inform; 2021 Oct; 154():104557. PubMed ID: 34455119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The predictive effect of different machine learning algorithms for pressure injuries in hospitalized patients: A network meta-analyses.
Qu C; Luo W; Zeng Z; Lin X; Gong X; Wang X; Zhang Y; Li Y
Heliyon; 2022 Nov; 8(11):e11361. PubMed ID: 36387440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Model for Predicting Cervical Cancer Using Machine Learning Algorithms.
Al Mudawi N; Alazeb A
Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 35684753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction and Detection of Cervical Malignancy Using Machine Learning Models.
Devi S; Gaikwad SR; R H
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2023 Apr; 24(4):1419-1433. PubMed ID: 37116167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A 5-year survival status prognosis of nonmetastatic cervical cancer patients through machine learning algorithms.
Yu W; Lu Y; Shou H; Xu H; Shi L; Geng X; Song T
Cancer Med; 2023 Mar; 12(6):6867-6876. PubMed ID: 36479910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting breast cancer 5-year survival using machine learning: A systematic review.
Li J; Zhou Z; Dong J; Fu Y; Li Y; Luan Z; Peng X
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250370. PubMed ID: 33861809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A review of image analysis and machine learning techniques for automated cervical cancer screening from pap-smear images.
William W; Ware A; Basaza-Ejiri AH; Obungoloch J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 164():15-22. PubMed ID: 30195423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Potential applications and performance of machine learning techniques and algorithms in clinical practice: A systematic review.
Nwanosike EM; Conway BR; Merchant HA; Hasan SS
Int J Med Inform; 2022 Mar; 159():104679. PubMed ID: 34990939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of machine learning in predicting hospital readmissions: a scoping review of the literature.
Huang Y; Talwar A; Chatterjee S; Aparasu RR
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):96. PubMed ID: 33952192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?
Anderson AB; Grazal CF; Balazs GC; Potter BK; Dickens JF; Forsberg JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):0-1618. PubMed ID: 32282466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An intelligent warning model for early prediction of cardiac arrest in sepsis patients.
Layeghian Javan S; Sepehri MM; Layeghian Javan M; Khatibi T
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Sep; 178():47-58. PubMed ID: 31416562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of machine learning algorithms in suicide risk prediction: a systematic review-meta analysis of clinical studies.
Ehtemam H; Sadeghi Esfahlani S; Sanaei A; Ghaemi MM; Hajesmaeel-Gohari S; Rahimisadegh R; Bahaadinbeigy K; Ghasemian F; Shirvani H
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2024 May; 24(1):138. PubMed ID: 38802823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scoping Review of Machine Learning Approaches.
Chopannejad S; Sadoughi F; Bagherzadeh R; Shekarchi S
Appl Clin Inform; 2022 May; 13(3):720-740. PubMed ID: 35617971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Machine learning vs. conventional statistical models for predicting heart failure readmission and mortality.
Shin S; Austin PC; Ross HJ; Abdel-Qadir H; Freitas C; Tomlinson G; Chicco D; Mahendiran M; Lawler PR; Billia F; Gramolini A; Epelman S; Wang B; Lee DS
ESC Heart Fail; 2021 Feb; 8(1):106-115. PubMed ID: 33205591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of several machine learning algorithms for the prediction of afatinib treatment outcome in advanced-stage EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer.
Kim T; Lee SJ; Jang TW
Thorac Cancer; 2022 Dec; 13(23):3353-3361. PubMed ID: 36278315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers.
Deist TM; Dankers FJWM; Valdes G; Wijsman R; Hsu IC; Oberije C; Lustberg T; van Soest J; Hoebers F; Jochems A; El Naqa I; Wee L; Morin O; Raleigh DR; Bots W; Kaanders JH; Belderbos J; Kwint M; Solberg T; Monshouwer R; Bussink J; Dekker A; Lambin P
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3449-3459. PubMed ID: 29763967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
