133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37057038)
1. Computer Assisted Objective Assessment of Micro-Neurosurgical Skills From Intraoperative Videos.
Deepika P; Deepesh KVV; Vadali PS; Rao M; Vazhayil V; Uppar AM
IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol; 2023; 4():11-20. PubMed ID: 37057038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated Vision-Based Microsurgical Skill Analysis in Neurosurgery Using Deep Learning: Development and Preclinical Validation.
Davids J; Makariou SG; Ashrafian H; Darzi A; Marcus HJ; Giannarou S
World Neurosurg; 2021 May; 149():e669-e686. PubMed ID: 33588081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microsurgical Tool Detection and Characterization in Intra-operative Neurosurgical Videos.
Ramesh A; Beniwal M; Uppar AM; V V; Rao M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():2676-2681. PubMed ID: 34891803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility Study of the Low-Cost Motion Tracking System for Assessing Endoscope Holding Skills.
Zhenzhu L; Lu L; Zhenzhi L; Xuzhi L; Yizhi L; Gangxian F; Henglu W; Jinke D; Qingbo W; Pengfei L; Meng L; Jianmin L; Zefu L
World Neurosurg; 2020 Aug; 140():312-319. PubMed ID: 32376376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proficiency performance benchmarks for removal of simulated brain tumors using a virtual reality simulator NeuroTouch.
AlZhrani G; Alotaibi F; Azarnoush H; Winkler-Schwartz A; Sabbagh A; Bajunaid K; Lajoie SP; Del Maestro RF
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(4):685-96. PubMed ID: 25687956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using artificial intelligence to quantify dynamic retraction of brain tissue and the manipulation of instruments in neurosurgery.
Martin T; El Hage G; Shedid D; Bojanowski MW
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2023 Aug; 18(8):1469-1478. PubMed ID: 36598652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated Microsurgical Tool Segmentation and Characterization in Intra-Operative Neurosurgical Videos.
Deepika P; Udupa K; Beniwal M; Uppar AM; V V; Rao M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():2110-2114. PubMed ID: 36086279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Construct validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator.
Pellen MG; Horgan LF; Barton JR; Attwood SE
Surg Endosc; 2009 Jan; 23(1):130-9. PubMed ID: 18648875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automation of surgical skill assessment using a three-stage machine learning algorithm.
Lavanchy JL; Zindel J; Kirtac K; Twick I; Hosgor E; Candinas D; Beldi G
Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):5197. PubMed ID: 33664317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neurosurgical Skills Assessment: Measuring Technical Proficiency in Neurosurgery Residents Through Intraoperative Video Evaluations.
Sarkiss CA; Philemond S; Lee J; Sobotka S; Holloway TD; Moore MM; Costa AB; Gordon EL; Bederson JB
World Neurosurg; 2016 May; 89():1-8. PubMed ID: 26724633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Task-Level vs. Segment-Level Quantitative Metrics for Surgical Skill Assessment.
Vedula SS; Malpani A; Ahmidi N; Khudanpur S; Hager G; Chen CC
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(3):482-9. PubMed ID: 26896147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A software-based tool for video motion tracking in the surgical skills assessment landscape.
Ganni S; Botden SMBI; Chmarra M; Goossens RHM; Jakimowicz JJ
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2994-2999. PubMed ID: 29340824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical instrument detection and tracking technologies: Automating dataset labeling for surgical skill assessment.
Nema S; Vachhani L
Front Robot AI; 2022; 9():1030846. PubMed ID: 36405072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic training using a quantitative assessment and instructional system.
Yamaguchi T; Nakamura R
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Sep; 13(9):1453-1461. PubMed ID: 29705826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of Minimally Invasive Suturing Skills: Is Instrument Tracking an Accurate Prediction?
Verhoeven DJ; Hillemans V; Leijte E; Verhoeven BH; Botden SMBI
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2023 Feb; 33(2):137-145. PubMed ID: 35900263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated objective surgical skill assessment in the operating room from unstructured tool motion in septoplasty.
Ahmidi N; Poddar P; Jones JD; Vedula SS; Ishii L; Hager GD; Ishii M
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Jun; 10(6):981-91. PubMed ID: 25895080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An objective and automated method for assessing surgical skill in endoscopic sinus surgery using eye-tracking and tool-motion data.
Ahmidi N; Ishii M; Fichtinger G; Gallia GL; Hager GD
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2012 Nov; 2(6):507-15. PubMed ID: 22696449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical task and skill classification from eye tracking and tool motion in minimally invasive surgery.
Ahmidi N; Hager GD; Ishii L; Fichtinger G; Gallia GL; Ishii M
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2010; 13(Pt 3):295-302. PubMed ID: 20879412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neurosurgical performance between experts and trainees: Evidence from drilling task.
Chainey J; O'Kelly CJ; Kim MJ; Zheng B
Int J Med Robot; 2021 Oct; 17(5):e2313. PubMed ID: 34288358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]