BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37057610)

  • 1. Historical controls in clinical trials: a note on linking Pocock's model with the robust mixture priors.
    Callegaro A; Galwey N; Abellan JJ
    Biostatistics; 2023 Apr; 24(2):443-448. PubMed ID: 37057610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robust meta-analytic-predictive priors in clinical trials with historical control information.
    Schmidli H; Gsteiger S; Roychoudhury S; O'Hagan A; Spiegelhalter D; Neuenschwander B
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):1023-32. PubMed ID: 25355546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian semiparametric meta-analytic-predictive prior for historical control borrowing in clinical trials.
    Hupf B; Bunn V; Lin J; Dong C
    Stat Med; 2021 Jun; 40(14):3385-3399. PubMed ID: 33851441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incorporating individual historical controls and aggregate treatment effect estimates into a Bayesian survival trial: a simulation study.
    Brard C; Hampson LV; Gaspar N; Le Deley MC; Le Teuff G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):85. PubMed ID: 31018832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SAM: Self-adapting mixture prior to dynamically borrow information from historical data in clinical trials.
    Yang P; Zhao Y; Nie L; Vallejo J; Yuan Y
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):2857-2868. PubMed ID: 37721513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Elastic priors to dynamically borrow information from historical data in clinical trials.
    Jiang L; Nie L; Yuan Y
    Biometrics; 2023 Mar; 79(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 34437714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Addressing prior-data conflict with empirical meta-analytic-predictive priors in clinical studies with historical information.
    Li JX; Chen WC; Scott JA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(6):1056-1066. PubMed ID: 27541990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian sample size determination using commensurate priors to leverage preexperimental data.
    Zheng H; Jaki T; Wason JMS
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):669-683. PubMed ID: 35253201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power priors based on multiple historical studies for binary outcomes.
    Gravestock I; Held L
    Biom J; 2019 Sep; 61(5):1201-1218. PubMed ID: 30325059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Critical appraisal of Bayesian dynamic borrowing from an imperfectly commensurate historical control.
    Harun N; Liu C; Kim MO
    Pharm Stat; 2020 Sep; 19(5):613-625. PubMed ID: 32185886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian clinical trial design using historical data that inform the treatment effect.
    Psioda MA; Ibrahim JG
    Biostatistics; 2019 Jul; 20(3):400-415. PubMed ID: 29547966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel power prior approach for borrowing historical control data in clinical trials.
    Shi Y; Li W; Liu GF
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Mar; 32(3):493-508. PubMed ID: 36601652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian selective response-adaptive design using the historical control.
    Kim MO; Harun N; Liu C; Khoury JC; Broderick JP
    Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(26):3709-3722. PubMed ID: 29900577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel equivalence probability weighted power prior for using historical control data in an adaptive clinical trial design: A comparison to standard methods.
    Bennett M; White S; Best N; Mander A
    Pharm Stat; 2021 May; 20(3):462-484. PubMed ID: 33474798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incorporating historical two-arm data in clinical trials with binary outcome: A practical approach.
    Feißt M; Krisam J; Kieser M
    Pharm Stat; 2020 Sep; 19(5):662-678. PubMed ID: 32227680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Propensity score-integrated Bayesian prior approaches for augmented control designs: a simulation study.
    Wang X; Suttner L; Jemielita T; Li X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2022 Jan; 32(1):170-190. PubMed ID: 34939894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of a historical control group in a noninferiority trial assessing a new antibacterial treatment: A case study and discussion of practical implementation aspects.
    Dejardin D; Delmar P; Warne C; Patel K; van Rosmalen J; Lesaffre E
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Mar; 17(2):169-181. PubMed ID: 29282862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utilization of Adult Data in Designing Pediatric Pharmacokinetic Studies: How Much Are Historical Adult Data Worth?
    Hsu CH; Steven Xu X; Wang J; Zhang L; Liu C; Wang Y
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2019 Jul; 59(7):989-996. PubMed ID: 30748023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using horseshoe prior for incorporating multiple historical control data in randomized controlled trials.
    Ohigashi T; Maruo K; Sozu T; Gosho M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Jul; 31(7):1392-1404. PubMed ID: 35379046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Borrowing historical information to improve phase I clinical trials using meta-analytic-predictive priors.
    Chen X; Zhang J; Jiang Q; Yan F
    J Biopharm Stat; 2022 Jan; 32(1):34-52. PubMed ID: 35594366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.